Washington Times
By Stephen Dinan
October 23, 2014
Immigrant
rights advocates unveiled a campaign billboard in North Carolina on
Thursday attacking Democratic Sen. Kay R. Hagan for being too strict on
illegal immigrants,
raising questions of how Hispanic voters will approach this year’s
elections.
Though
Ms. Hagan voted last year for the Senate bill that would have legalized
most illegal immigrants, the North Carolina Dream Team, a group of
“dreamers,” young adult
immigrants who were brought to the country illegally, said the rest of
her record makes her unworthy of Hispanic votes.
“A
vote to keep up appearances is one thing, but those of us that have
been advocating for several years now, we know better,” said Viridiana
Martinez, an organizer. “Sen.
Hagan is an anti-immigrant senator. She is as ‘anti-‘ as they come.”
Ms.
Hagan refuted the attack and called on “all my friends in the community
to understand the difference” between herself and Republican opponent
Thom Tillis.
Although
Ms. Hagan denies being too strict on immigration, other Democrats in
Southern states are embracing tough approaches and running ads accusing
their Republican
opponents of being too soft on illegal immigration — suggesting just
how muddied immigration politics has become.
A
year ago, polling suggested that the public was shifting toward more
leniency, placing legalization as a higher priority than border
security. Republicans were scrambling
to catch up to Democrats, most of whom embraced legalization and
enjoyed electoral gains among Hispanic voters for that support.
But
a surge of illegal immigrant children this year, combined with
President Obama’s promises of unilateral action granting tentative legal
status to more illegal immigrants,
have clouded the politics — particularly for Hispanics who see
immigration as a threshold issue to earn their votes.
The
Hispanic vote is getting less attention than it does in presidential
election years because there aren’t many Senate races in play in states
with large Hispanic populations.
One
state that is getting attention is Colorado, where activists said they
have registered more than 30,000 Hispanic voters this year alone.
In Georgia, the Hispanic population has surged to a point where more than 200,000 of them might be voting.
The
Alliance for Citizenship, which advocates Hispanic voting, said neither
party has made an investment “in genuinely engaging Latino voters,” but
it predicted that Hispanics
will show up at polls to punish those who prevented a legalization bill
from passing in Congress — which means the GOP.
“This movement understands that this election is about demonstrating its growing political power,” the alliance said.
Daniel
Garza, executive director of the Libre Initiative, said he expects some
Republican candidates to do well among Hispanics next month — a
vindication for those who
have engaged with the community.
“He
or she who controls the conversation will be rewarded with the vote,
and that’s what conservatives have not done well in the past,” said Mr.
Garza, whose organization
is trying to inject a voice for free markets into the political
conversation among Hispanics. “I think what we’re seeing in this
election cycle is there is a new conversation.”
Even with less attention on Hispanics this election year, Mr. Garza said, there are plenty of reasons to watch how they vote.
If
Greg Abbott, a Republican, can garner 50 percent of the Hispanic vote
in his quest for Texas’ governorship, it will doom Democrats’ vow of
making the state competitive
in the near future, Mr. Garza said. The latest polling shows Mr. Abbott
nearly tied among Hispanics.
Hispanic
Republican candidates are poised to add to their numbers in the House,
Mr. Garza said, and Republicans are looking to flip control of
statehouse chambers in New
Mexico and Colorado — states with large Hispanic populations.
The
National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials
estimates that 7.8 million Hispanics will vote in this year’s elections,
up 1.2 million from the midterm
elections in 2010.
North
Carolina is one place where Hispanics are viewed as increasingly
important to statewide elections, which is why Ms. Hagan’s immigration
record is under scrutiny.
Ms.
Martinez, the organizer for the team that posted the billboard attacks,
said she wouldn’t necessarily tell voters to back Mr. Tillis, but she
wants them to know Ms.
Hagan’s background, which includes supporting a state law that blocks
illegal immigrants from getting driver’s licenses and includes a vote
this year against continuing Mr. Obama’s nondeportation policy for
dreamers.
“Hagan
has a record of being anti-immigrant. Tillis doesn’t have anything,”
she said. “Now I’m not saying that Tillis, we fully trust Tillis — by no
means. I think any
person that’s elected needs to be held accountable.”
Ms.
Martinez said she knows many voters from mixed-status families — with
at least one member in the country without authorization — who probably
will sit out the Senate
election.
At
a campaign stop Thursday, Ms. Hagan said her record is better than Mr.
Tillis‘. She pointed to her vote last year in favor of the Senate
immigration bill, written by
the bipartisan Gang of Eight, which would have granted eventual
citizenship rights to most illegal immigrants, boosted legal immigration
and spent tens of millions of dollars hiring more Border Patrol agents
and building more fencing.
“I have supported a common-sense bipartisan immigration bill. I think that’s what we need,” Ms. Hagan told reporters.
She accused Mr. Tillis of talking only about border security, which she said doesn’t solve the problem.
While
Ms. Hagan defended her vote, some Democratic candidates have adopted
more combative approaches. In Louisiana, Sen. Mary L. Landrieu is
touting her support for more
border fencing. In Kentucky, Democrat Alison Lundergan Grimes attacked
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell for voting for the 1986 amnesty,
which legalized 3 million immigrants.
Ms. Grimes says in her ad that she has “never supported amnesty or benefits for illegal immigrants, and I never will.”
Mr. Garza said Hispanic voters will judge Ms. Grimes and Ms. Landrieu as political opportunists.
“What
we’re seeing is that Latinos are back in the crossroads and beginning
to distance themselves from the Democratic brand because their policies
don’t work and they’re
not credible,” he said.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment