Washington Post
By Jerry Markon
October 10, 2014
As
Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson grapples with the Secret
Service scandal and evolving terrorist threats, he is also facing
widespread and growing job dissatisfaction
within his own department, according to unpublicized employee survey
results.
The
government’s 2014 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey portrays a
Department of Homeland Security still facing debilitating morale
problems that have plagued it for years
but worsened during the Obama administration — and which have grown
more serious since Johnson took over in December.
While
the survey shows that the vast majority of DHS employees are
hard-working and dedicated to their mission to protect the homeland,
many say the department discourages
innovation, treats employees in an arbitrary fashion and fails to
recruit skilled personnel.
The
results render a harsh initial verdict on Johnson, who took office
nearly a year ago and has vowed to improve morale: DHS employees’ views
of their leaders, already
abysmally low in 2013, plunged even more this year.
At
the DHS Science and Technology Directorate, for example, only 21
percent of employees in this year’s survey held positive views of their
leadership’s ability to “generate
high levels of motivation and commitment in the workforce,’’ according
to results for that division.
The
survey numbers were provided to The Washington Post by a person
requesting anonymity, to avoid antagonizing DHS officials. The division
is DHS’s research and development
arm.
Reginald
Brothers, DHS’s undersecretary for science and technology, said in an
internal e-mail to employees on Wednesday that the results show
“sustained dissatisfaction
among S&T employees regarding the organization as a place to
work.’’
The
Office of Personnel Management, which conducts the annual employee
survey, has not released the government-wide numbers or those of
individual departments. An OPM
spokeswoman said Thursday that they would be made public within several
weeks.
DHS
last week posted its department-wide 2014 survey results in a
difficult-to-find part of its Web site, but it has not publicized the
data. The survey has long been
a measure of federal job satisfaction and a guide for government
leaders, and it forms the basis of the widely read annual Best Places to
Work in the Federal Government report.
Internally,
Johnson and DHS Deputy Secretary Alejandro N. Mayorkas have
acknowledged morale problems and embraced the challenge of fixing them,
outlining a series of efforts
that include an employee steering committee dedicated to fairness in
hiring and promotions, enhanced employee training programs and the
reestablishment of a dormant DHS program to honor outstanding department
employees.
“You
deserve a workplace that recognizes your efforts, supports your great
work, and fulfills your highest aspirations,’’ Johnson and Mayorkas
wrote Friday in a department-wide
e-mail, which was provided by DHS officials. “It is clear from feedback
since the creation of this Department that many of you do not feel that
you have such a workplace. The results from the Federal Employee
Viewpoint Survey taken earlier this year continue
to communicate this point strongly…. The results are not good.’’
Johnson and Mayorkas said the survey results will further inform their work and “catalyze” their efforts.
“As
your leaders, we understand that the responsibility to deliver starts
with us,” the seniore officials wrote. “We embrace that
responsibility.’’
The
poor results come as Johnson, the fourth person to lead the sprawling
domestic safety agency, has taken on an increasingly prominent role as
an Obama administration
spokesman on matters ranging from the problem of unaccompanied minors
crossing the southwestern border to the problems at the Secret Service.
It was Johnson who announced the resignation last week of Secret Service
Director Julia Pierson.
President
George W. Bush created DHS after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks,
bringing together more than a dozen agencies and upwards of 230,000
employees who handle
a range of duties, from border protection and airport security to
emergency response and protecting the commander in chief.
Since
its inception, the department has been plagued by poor morale and a
work environment widely seen as dysfunctional, which has contributed to
an exodus of top-level
officials in recent years, many of whom have been lured by private
security companies.
Over
the past four years, employees have left DHS at a rate nearly twice as
fast as for the federal government overall, according to a review of a
federal database.
Johnson
has focused on these problems from the start, calling vacancies and
morale his top priorities before his December confirmation. He has made
major progress on reducing
a top-level DHS vacancy rate that had reached 40 percent.
But
the entrenched morale problems have proven far trickier, the new survey
results show. Though the survey is only an initial test of Johnson’s
leadership, it does measure
the first six months of his tenure. OPM announced April 29 that it was
mailing the surveys to a sampling of federal employees over the
following two weeks and that they had until early June to complete the
detailed questionnaires.
More
than 40,000 DHS employees responded. The department had already ranked
dead-last among large agencies last year in the Partnership for Public
Service’s best places
to work survey — drawn from the OPM data — and this year’s results were
even worse. Only 41.6 percent of DHS employees said they were satisfied
with the department, down from 44.4 percent a year earlier.
Much
of their frustration was directed at senior leadership. In 2013, only
29.9 percent of employees department-wide had a positive view of their
leaders’ ability to “generate
high levels of motivation and commitment in the workforce.’’ That
number plunged to 24.9 percent this year.
Asked
if their leaders “maintain high standards of honesty and integrity,’’
just 39.1 percent of employees responded positively. Last year, that
number was 44.5 percent.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment