Wall Street Journal
By Janet Hook
October 7, 2014
Republican
Sen. Lindsey Graham, after an early scare, is cruising toward
re-election next month in South Carolina. Yet, he isn’t sure what the
deeper meaning of victory
will be this year.
“There is no mandate other than, ‘We don’t like the other guy,’ ” he said.
Sen.
Graham and his fellow Republicans hold a clear edge as the midterm
campaign heads into its stretch run. The party is almost certain to keep
control of the House,
and may expand its majority. Depending on the outcome in several close
states, the Republican Party could gain between four and seven seats in
the Senate, giving it a good shot at capturing that chamber and, with
it, control of Congress for the first time
in eight years.
But
the GOP’s advantage springs more from intense anti- Obama feelings than
from a wave of voters who believe Republicans will transform
Washington. Indeed, disillusionment
with politics may help explain why Republicans’ edge isn’t wider at a
time when job approval ratings of the Democratic president have slid
into the 40% range.
The
backdrop of this fall’s voting is a mood of voter anger over the status
quo, polls suggest. Just one month before the Nov. 4 election, it isn’t
even clear what exactly
the midterm contests are about. No single issue dominates, except
unhappiness with the established order.
In
Virginia, one black voter was so eager to unseat a House incumbent, he
voted in a GOP primary for the first time. In Wisconsin, an independent
voter is looking to third-party
candidates because he said neither Democrats nor Republicans address
his worries about the economy.
Interviews
and a review of polls reveal an electorate with less faith than ever in
the political system. Two-thirds of registered voters believe the
country is on the
wrong track, while just a quarter say the U.S. is moving in the right
direction—the widest gap before a midterm election in more than 20
years, The Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll found last month.
“In
the past, there was a feeling that government was on their side; now
they feel the government is against them,” said Rep. Nick Rahall (D.,
W.Va.), who is in a tough
re-election fight. “It makes it doubly difficult for me to make my
case.”
The
relentlessly negative, low-interest congressional campaigns are likely
to leave the winners without a clear mandate. That kind of outcome
doesn’t bode well for action
on the many issues the current Congress has left unresolved, including
overhauls of the immigration system and the tax code.
The
Center for the Study of the American Electorate found record-low
turnouts in primary elections, likely foretelling a big drop in turnout
this fall. And the sour mood
of voters makes election outcomes—including which party will control
the Senate—hard to predict.
“This
stuff is totally up in the air,” said Newt Gingrich, the former House
Speaker who led the GOP to its 1994 midterm victory. “You have no idea
what’s going to happen
next.”
In
deep-red Kansas, for example, political pros are stunned by the
spectacle of Republican Sen. Pat Roberts running scared against an
independent candidate. In the Virginia
primary, former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor was ousted, and two
college professors are running to succeed him.
Democrats
have the most to lose as they struggle to defend more seats for control
of the Senate. Polls suggest they are likely to lose ground in South
Dakota, West Virginia,
Montana and, possibly, Iowa as Democratic senators retire. At the same
time, Democratic incumbents are struggling to win re-election in North
Carolina, Colorado, Louisiana, Arkansas and Alaska.
Across
the U.S., some races are so unstable that polls look promising one week
and spell big trouble the next. “Polling in competitive districts is
more erratic than ever,”
said U.S. Rep. Steve Israel (D., N.Y.), chairman of the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee.
The
2014 midterm campaign is likely to fuel falling confidence in
Washington. Candidates are employing record levels of negative
advertising, with a focus on mobilizing
partisans rather than setting broad governing agendas.
North
Carolina political activist Miriam Chu said it has been a struggle to
persuade conservatives to vote for GOP Senate candidate Thom Tillis, who
beat a tea party candidate
in the primary. Ms. Chu has taken to Facebook to encourage
conservatives to vote for Mr. Tillis—rather than risk re-election of
Democratic Sen. Kay Hagan.
“There’s
definitely less energy than there was in 2010,” said Matt Kibbe,
president of the conservative group FreedomWorks. “One factor is the
very risk-averse, almost
issueless campaign that most Republicans are running.”
Neither
party has a bold-strokes agenda. And voters have been mercurial about
what issues matter most to them. In polling over the past year, the
economy and jobs have
typically topped voters’ priorities, but health care, immigration and,
lately, national security have cycled up and down the list.
Voter hostility isn’t new. The lack of an animating political issue makes this year unusual.
In
the 1994 midterm election, voters believed the U.S. was on the wrong
track; they blamed Democrats, who lost control of the House for the
first time in 40 years.
In
the 2006 midterm, voters weary over the war in Iraq returned control to
Democrats. In 2010, the electorate turned against President Barack
Obama over the ailing economy
and the new health-care law. Crowds demonstrated on the Capitol lawn.
Town hall meetings erupted into shouting matches. Tea party chapters
popped up like wild mushrooms.
This
year, frustrated voters aren’t flocking to either party. “The GOP may
be heading to a good November, but its victory will truly be the lesser
of two evils,” said
Fred Yang, a Democratic pollster who conducts The Wall Street
Journal/NBC News Poll with Republican Bill McInturff. The poll has found
voters mired in pessimism, political cynicism and economic anxiety.
“About
three in 10 voters are disillusioned because they are feeling stuck in
some quagmire that is a mix of political gridlock and economic
stagnation,” said Micah Roberts,
a Republican pollster who helped conduct the survey. Among the data
points of disillusionment:
Political
cynicism: More than half said Washington would be unchanged by the
midterm elections, regardless of the result. Majorities in both parties
said their preference
for a Democratic or Republican Congress was motivated more by a desire
to block the other party than to advance their own.
Economic
anxiety: Even as signs of recovery multiply, just 27% of respondents
said they expected the economy to improve in the next year. In an August
poll, three-quarters
said they weren’t confident that their children’s generation would be
better off than their own.
“I
think the people of this country are feeling insecure—about the economy
and about whether their jobs are really going to be there and whether
upward mobility is available
to them,” said Sen. Susan Collins, a Maine Republican who is up for
re-election in a state where an improving economy is still marbled with
insecurity.
Maine’s
unemployment rate was 5.6% in August—the 17th lowest in the U.S. The
state gained 9,400 private sector jobs that month. But over the past
year, Maine has also
been bruised by a series of paper mill closings.
“Those
are communities where the mill is the economic mainstay, and it has a
ripple effect on consumer spending throughout the region,’’ Ms. Collins
said.
Adam
Westphal, a political independent in Wisconsin who works in
construction, said the local economy seemed to be improving but politics
injects uncertainty. GOP Gov.
Scott Walker is in a tight race for re-election, and Mr. Westphal fears
a victory by Democratic Party candidate, Mary Burke.
“There’s a construction boom, yeah, but what if Mary Burke gets elected and wants to raise taxes?” Mr. Westphal said.
Ms. Burke hasn’t advocated tax increases, her campaign spokeswoman said.
For
many economically beleaguered voters, politics presents no answers. “No
one is talking for the little guy and the middle class,” said Michele
Jeffers, a 58-year-old
resident of Avon, Minn., who isn’t able to work for health reasons.
“We
don’t live a lavish life. We have flip phones, and we don’t have any
fancy cars,” said Ms. Jeffers, whose husband works for a grocery. “You
can’t even have Sundays
together. My husband can’t make it to church. He can’t even have
Thanksgiving off.”
Facing
a disengaged electorate, candidates in both parties have launched a
barrage of ads to mobilize their base. That creates fertile ground for
the drama unfolding in
Kansas, where Mr. Roberts, after defeating a tea party opponent in the
primary, is now running hard against Greg Orman, an independent.
Mr.
Roberts is attacking Mr. Orman’s credentials as an independent, trying
to link him to the Democratic Party in general and Mr. Obama in
particular. When the two men
debated, Mr. Roberts kept mentioning Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
—a Democratic power broker whose name inflames GOP stalwarts.
Mr.
Orman’s latest ad speaks directly to disaffected voters: “That’s
exactly what’s wrong with Washington today. They would rather attack
opponents than the problems we
face.’’
Anti-Washington
sentiment also poses risks to Democrats among such voters as Sam Giles,
an African-American in Glen Allen, Va. He voted in a Republican primary
for the
first time so he could help oust Mr. Cantor, the former House Majority
Leader.
Mr.
Giles, a two-time Obama backer, voted for Dave Brat —a professor at
Randolph-Macon College who defeated Mr. Cantor—knowing little about him.
But now, Mr. Giles said,
he is inclined to support Mr. Brat in the general election because he
is so hungry for change.
“I’m glad you are out here,” Mr. Giles told the Republican at a community fair in Glen Allen. “I’m looking for some new ideas.”
Mr.
Brat is favored to beat another Randolph-Macon professor, Democrat Jack
Trammell. They agree on one thing: Voters have had it with Washington.
And the two revel in
their status as political amateurs.
“I’m
one of the two professors running for Congress; I’m the Democrat,” Mr.
Trammell said at the fair. “The joke is that the loser gets tenure.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment