Los Angeles Times
By Molly Hennessy-Fiske
August 31, 2015
Jorge Ramirez fled Honduras with his family in June, paying a smuggler to take them across the Rio Grande to seek asylum.
To Ramirez, 32, a propane salesman, the U.S. offered hope.
“I thought they would help us,” he said of immigration officials. “I never thought they would treat us the way they did.”
Ramirez
and his older children — ages 12 and 10 — crossed first, were caught by
Border Patrol and locked up at a family detention center in
Pennsylvania; his wife, Judy,
and 3-year-old twins crossed a week later and were detained in Texas.
What
happened next illustrates what some immigrant rights groups say is the
disparate treatment of men and women detained in family detention
centers.
Immigrants
and their attorneys argue the Obama administration is jailing mothers
at the centers as a deterrent to others tempted to cross the U.S.-Mexico
border illegally.
The
Ramirezes were unable to communicate until July 5, when Ramirez was
released on $10,000 bond with his two eldest children to stay with a
relative in Hartford, Conn.
His wife and twins were still being held without bail in late August.
“They
are using the mothers and the children … to make people afraid,”
Ramirez said of immigration officials. “The family needs to be united.
My children miss their mother.”
After
the southern border was overwhelmed with more than 62,000 unaccompanied
children and about as many families crossing illegally last fiscal
year, the Obama administration
expanded the number of family detention centers from one 95-bed center
in Leesport, Pa., where Ramirez was held, to three that will open by
year’s end, bringing the number of beds to 3,700.
As
of late last month, 764 adults and children were held in family
detention, including eight fathers with children and one father with his
wife and child.
“Traditionally,
adult males constitute less than 3% of all detained families. This
figure has remained static in recent years,” said Gillian Christensen,
an ICE spokeswoman.
Border
Patrol does not release family-apprehension figures broken down by the
number of children caught with mothers compared with fathers.
“The
majority have been mothers that we know of,” said Michelle Brané,
director of the Women’s Refugee Commission’s Migrant Rights and Justice
program in Washington, D.C.
Immigrants
and their attorneys argue that the administration is illegally jailing
mothers at the centers as a deterrent. In February, U.S. District Judge
James E. Boasberg
in Washington, D.C., agreed, saying jailing the mothers as a deterrent
to future migrants was “likely unlawful” and ordered the government to
stop.
The
disproportionate detaining of immigrant mothers was highlighted again
in July in a federal California case in which immigrants’ attorneys
challenged whether the administration
had met conditions for detaining children established by a 1997 legal
settlement.
The
attorneys argued that the department “clings to a unique year-old
policy that is not only illegal in the sense that it violates the
settlement, but is almost certainly
unconstitutional in that it violently discriminates against mothers but
not identically situated fathers.”
Ramirez’s
attorney, Carol Anne Donohoe, has represented a half-dozen fathers and
wants their families released and reunited or, failing that, held
together.
If
a child is caught with a parent, several things can happen. They may be
detained together at the sole facility that houses fathers: Berks
County Residential Center
in Leesport. They may be divided between their parents at different
detention centers. Or they may be held with their mother in family
detention while their father is sent to a men’s detention facility,
sometimes across the country.
Donohoe
said advocates have seen fathers separated from wives and children by
immigration officials, the women and children held in family detention
or the children classified
as unaccompanied minors and placed with relatives or other sponsors.
“Every
effort is made to keep a family together; however, sometimes the
parents do not travel together and are apprehended separately. If a
spouse is identified at another
detention facility, [officials] will make arrangements to transfer the
spouse to Berks, if space is available,” ICE officials said in a
statement.
ICE
officials said the agency strives to house families with children of
similar sexes and ages together. When family detention centers don’t
have such bed space for fathers
who arrive with children, they may be released, sometimes with bonds
and ankle monitors, other times on their own recognizance.
Immigrant advocates say separating families can cause problems for children.
One
of Donohoe’s clients, Amadeo Garcia, a Guatemalan immigrant detained
with his 17-year-old son at Berks, was accused earlier this year of
inappropriately touching a
female detainee in a telephone room. He was questioned by police and
deported, Donohoe said. The son was re-classified as an unaccompanied
minor and placed with relatives in Alabama.
“Where
do they get the authority to do that?” Donohoe said. “There was no
investigation. A police officer came and questioned him without me,
knowing that he had an attorney.
No charges. And the woman who accused him was released the next day on
bond.”
ICE
officials said they could not comment about the specifics of Garcia’s
case because of privacy concerns, but added, “any credible accusations
against a resident are
dealt with swiftly and appropriately.” They added that “criminal
investigations are outside of the purview of an immigration attorney’s
representation.”
Another
father detained at Berks with his wife and two children, ages 3 and 1,
was released with the nursing baby to live with a relative in South
Carolina while the mother
remained locked up, Donohoe said.
Separating families also can cause problems for their immigration cases, she said.
In
Ramirez’s case, Donohoe did not know his wife and children were
Garifuna, an ethnic minority in Honduras, and had been harassed. That’s
grounds for an asylum claim,
but Donohoe learned of their background only by chance during a phone
call with an asylum officer in Texas.
“There’s no rhyme or reason to the system,” Donohoe said.
Ramirez’s
wife passed her asylum screening early last month but was not
immediately released. Detention was wearing on the 3-year-old twins, one
of whom was severely constipated.
Finally,
Judy Ramirez, 31, was issued an ankle monitor and released with her
daughters Aug. 20. They caught a Greyhound bus the next morning from San
Antonio to Hartford
and arrived in Connecticut two days later.
Jorge Ramirez said dividing families in detention will not stop them from crossing the border illegally.
“We’re fleeing violence in our countries. Let us live with our children,” he said.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment