New York Magazine (Opinion)
By Jonathan Chait
September 22, 2015
Marco
Rubio was the great hope of the Republican elite who, in the wake of
Mitt Romney's defeat, cast about for a new standard-bearer who might
repair the party’s disastrous
image with nonwhite voters. The part of the plan where Rubio wins the
nomination is going pretty well, as fellow party stalwarts fail to catch
on, Rubio performs effectively in debates, and Donald Trump occupies
the space that a more plausible challenger,
like Ted Cruz, might have taken. What’s going less well is the part
where Rubio maintains his political appeal to swing voters.
First
Rubio was forced to repudiate his own comprehensive immigration-reform
plan. Then he proposed a huge tax cut for the rich, followed by an even
huger tax cut for
the rich. He’s defended the Republican plan to shut down the federal
government over Planned Parenthood. Now he is promising to oppose a path
to citizenship any time over the next decade, even if he manages to
secure the border first:
"I
don't think it's a decision you have to make on the front end. The
first two things you have to do is stop illegal immigration, then second
you have to modernize our
legal immigration system, and then third you can have a debate about
how to even legalize people to begin with," Rubio said. "And then
ultimately in 10 or 12 years you could have a broader debate about how
has this worked out and should we allow some of them
to apply for green cards and eventually citizenship."
Ten
to 12 years means Rubio is ruling out a path to citizenship even if he
wins a second term in office. He’s still young, handsome, and the son of
Cuban immigrants, but
Rubio has locked himself into some pretty right-wing positions if he
wins. And the Iowa caucus is still more than four months away!
Update:
Alex Conant, Rubio's communications director, emails, "Your piece about
immigration misunderstands his position. The position stated yesterday
is no different
than the one that Marco outlined in his book, American Dreams. We can't
even begin to debate what to do with those here illegally until we
first secure borders and modernize legal immigration system. After that
is achieved, we can have a broader debate about
what to do with those here illegally. Marco has repeatedly stated --
and did so again last night -- that he is open to green cards after 10
years and he has outlined a specific idea on how to do that."
I
don't understand what about this contradicts the characterization
above. The key thing about Rubio's statement to Hannity (which is
emphasized by Sahil Kapur, the reporter
whose story I have linked above) is that he promises to postpone the
debate over a path to citizenship for 10-12 years.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment