About Me

My photo
Beverly Hills, California, United States
Eli Kantor is a labor, employment and immigration law attorney. He has been practicing labor, employment and immigration law for more than 36 years. He has been featured in articles about labor, employment and immigration law in the L.A. Times, Business Week.com and Daily Variety. He is a regular columnist for the Daily Journal. Telephone (310)274-8216; eli@elikantorlaw.com. For more information, visit beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com and and beverlyhillsemploymentlaw.com

Translate

Tuesday, September 22, 2015

What Happens To A Child After A Parent Is Deported?

National Journal
By Emily DeRuy
September 21, 2015

When a man gets de­por­ted, the fo­cus is of­ten on what he might have done wrong and not on who he leaves be­hind.

But a new Mi­gra­tion Policy In­sti­tute re­port fo­cuses on how the de­port­a­tion of a par­ent af­fects the well-be­ing of a child.

The re­port, done in con­junc­tion with the Urb­an In­sti­tute, es­tim­ates that between 2009 and 2013, a half-mil­lion par­ents of roughly the same num­ber of chil­dren who are cit­izens may have been de­por­ted. The vast ma­jor­ity were fath­ers, and most of their chil­dren stayed in the coun­try, even when they ended up in the care of dis­tant re­l­at­ives and friends.

Be­ha­vi­or­al prob­lems can arise at school as a res­ult of de­pres­sion and an­ger. Liv­ing situ­ations and eco­nom­ic se­cur­ity can be­come tenu­ous. Ac­cess to be­ne­fits such as food stamps and health­care can be jeop­ard­ized. But too of­ten, ad­voc­ates say, these con­sequences of par­ent­al de­port­a­tion on a child’s well-be­ing are over­looked.

“That’s the col­lat­er­al dam­age that gets lost in this [im­mig­ra­tion] dis­cus­sion,” said Heath­er Koball, a seni­or fel­low at the Urb­an In­sti­tute and one of the lead in­vest­ig­at­ors on the re­port.

While Im­mig­ra­tion and Cus­toms En­force­ment has re­fined its en­force­ment pri­or­it­ies in re­cent years to tar­get un­au­thor­ized im­mig­rants who are seen as na­tion­al se­cur­ity risks, or who have been con­victed of felon­ies or sig­ni­fic­ant mis­de­mean­ors, as Marc Rosen­blum, deputy dir­ect­or of MPI’s U.S. Im­mig­ra­tion Policy Pro­gram, said, there is no good way to de­port par­ents “without severely dam­aging im­mig­rant com­munit­ies.”

“ Things are so uncertain for families in terms of the future of immigration policy … The political climate and rhetoric aren’t exactly getting any friendlier. ”

The fath­ers who are de­por­ted are of­ten primary bread­win­ners, leav­ing moth­ers and chil­dren without fin­an­cial sup­port be­hind. The men­tal toll and isol­a­tion on both par­ents and chil­dren who re­main in the U.S. can be dev­ast­at­ing, which is of­ten com­poun­ded by a re­luct­ance or in­ab­il­ity to ac­cess men­tal-health care that might bring some re­lief.

“A lot of the fam­il­ies are em­bar­rassed to come for­ward,” Koball said.

While schools, com­munity or­gan­iz­a­tions and churches can of­fer some as­sist­ance, it’s of­ten tem­por­ary and if chil­dren are taken in by someone who is un­doc­u­mented, fear of de­port­a­tion can pre­vent that per­son from seek­ing as­sist­ance. In areas where im­mig­rant com­munit­ies are less es­tab­lished, ser­vices may not be cul­tur­ally or lin­guist­ic­ally com­pat­ible.

The re­port sug­gests more edu­ca­tion and out­reach to com­munit­ies by adding bi­lin­gual work­ers and co­ordin­at­ing with trus­ted com­munity groups. And the gov­ern­ment has taken steps in re­cent years to crack down on not­ari­os who of­fer bogus im­mig­ra­tion ser­vices and to ex­tend de­port­a­tion re­lief to people who may be vic­tims of do­mest­ic vi­ol­ence.

But the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions aimed at keep­ing fam­il­ies to­geth­er re­main tied up in court, and ad­voc­ates say more needs to be done to keep chil­dren with their par­ents. They worry the polit­ic­al cli­mate is be­com­ing more, not less, hos­tile in the run-up to the 2016 elec­tion.

“Things are so un­cer­tain for fam­il­ies in terms of the fu­ture of im­mig­ra­tion policy,” said Wendy Cer­vantes, dir­ect­or of the Cen­ter for the Chil­dren of Im­mig­rants. “The polit­ic­al cli­mate and rhet­or­ic aren’t ex­actly get­ting any friend­li­er.”

She wor­ries that pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates like Don­ald Trump are mak­ing neg­at­ive pub­lic com­ments that could neg­at­ively im­pact the treat­ment of chil­dren who re­main in the U.S. “The rhet­or­ic we’ve been hear­ing has been very dis­heart­en­ing and dan­ger­ous,” she said. “It can really im­pact out­comes for chil­dren.”

While Eliza­beth Thornton, who is de­tailed to ICE as an ad­visor, touted the agency’s ef­forts in re­cent years to min­im­ize fam­ily dis­rup­tion, she said the of­fice is “very open to hear­ing about how we could do things bet­ter.”


Ad­voc­ates like Cer­vantes will surely have plenty of sug­ges­tions.

For more information, go to:  www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com

No comments: