National Journal
By Emily DeRuy
September 21, 2015
When a man gets deported, the focus is often on what he might have done wrong and not on who he leaves behind.
But a new Migration Policy
Institute report focuses on how the deportation of a parent affects the well-being of a child.
The report, done in conjunction with the Urban Institute,
estimates that between 2009 and 2013, a half-million parents of
roughly the same number of children who are citizens may have been
deported. The vast majority were fathers, and most of their
children stayed in the country, even when they ended up in the care of
distant relatives and friends.
Behavioral
problems can arise at school as a result of depression and anger.
Living situations and economic security can become tenuous.
Access to benefits
such as food stamps and healthcare can be jeopardized. But too
often, advocates say, these consequences of parental
deportation on a child’s well-being are overlooked.
“That’s
the collateral damage that gets lost in this [immigration]
discussion,” said Heather Koball, a senior fellow at the Urban
Institute and one of the
lead investigators on the report.
While
Immigration and Customs Enforcement has refined its
enforcement priorities in recent years to target unauthorized
immigrants who are seen as national
security risks, or who have been convicted of felonies or
significant misdemeanors, as Marc Rosenblum, deputy director of
MPI’s U.S. Immigration Policy Program, said, there is no good way
to deport parents “without severely damaging immigrant
communities.”
“
Things are so uncertain for families in terms of the future of
immigration policy … The political climate and rhetoric aren’t exactly
getting any friendlier. ”
The
fathers who are deported are often primary breadwinners, leaving
mothers and children without financial support behind. The
mental toll and isolation
on both parents and children who remain in the U.S. can be
devastating, which is often compounded by a reluctance or
inability to access mental-health care that might bring some
relief.
“A lot of the families are embarrassed to come forward,” Koball said.
While
schools, community organizations and churches can offer some
assistance, it’s often temporary and if children are taken in by
someone who is undocumented,
fear of deportation can prevent that person from seeking
assistance. In areas where immigrant communities are less
established, services may not be culturally or linguistically
compatible.
The
report suggests more education and outreach to communities by
adding bilingual workers and coordinating with trusted community
groups. And the government
has taken steps in recent years to crack down on notarios who
offer bogus immigration services and to extend deportation
relief to people who may be victims of domestic violence.
But
the Obama administration’s executive actions aimed at keeping
families together remain tied up in court, and advocates say more
needs to be done to
keep children with their parents. They worry the political climate
is becoming more, not less, hostile in the run-up to the 2016
election.
“Things
are so uncertain for families in terms of the future of
immigration policy,” said Wendy Cervantes, director of the Center
for the Children of Immigrants.
“The political climate and rhetoric aren’t exactly getting any
friendlier.”
She
worries that presidential candidates like Donald Trump are
making negative public comments that could negatively impact the
treatment of children
who remain in the U.S. “The rhetoric we’ve been hearing has been
very disheartening and dangerous,” she said. “It can really impact
outcomes for children.”
While
Elizabeth Thornton, who is detailed to ICE as an advisor, touted the
agency’s efforts in recent years to minimize family disruption,
she said the office
is “very open to hearing about how we could do things better.”
Advocates like Cervantes will surely have plenty of suggestions.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment