Austin American Statesman (Texas)
By Jazmine Ulloa and James Barragan
September 25, 2015
Everyone born in Texas has a birth record filed with the state and is a U.S. citizen.
But
since January 2014, three months after Ellie was born in a children’s
hospital in rural Edinburg, the state of Texas has denied her mother’s
request for a certified
copy of her birth certificate. State officials have repeatedly refused
to accept Juana’s Mexican consular card or passport as valid
identification, effectively denying the child proof of her identity.
Juana
is living in the country without permission and asked that the
American-Statesman not use her last name or the real name of her
daughter for fear of reprisals.
The
denial of a copy of her child’s birth certificate is a problem Juana
could share with hundreds of immigrant families in the Rio Grande
Valley, more than 25 of whom
are suing the Texas Department of State Health Services in Austin. The
families say that in prohibiting certain forms of identification in the
application for a birth certificate, the agency is depriving Texas-born
children their citizenship rights based on
the immigration status of their parents.
Texas officials say their precautions are needed to prevent fraud and identity theft.
The
case, filed in May, has made headlines in the midst of a growing
national debate over immigration, and late last month, the families
garnered the support of the Mexican
government, which denounced the Texas health department’s rules for
putting young people in a “drastic state of vulnerability.”
Lawyers
and foreign policy experts say the agency’s policy is part of
reactionary measures to cyclical waves of anti-immigrant sentiment that
heat up every few years,
stemming from a frustration with the federal government’s inability to
address immigration reform on a national level.
This
year, that narrative has found a new and brazen voice in the surprise
Republican presidential front-runner, Donald Trump, who has referred to
Mexican immigrants as
criminals and rapists and proposed doing away with birthright citizenship. As other candidates join the discourse and up the rhetoric,
the federal case over birth certificates is unprecedented, political
observers said, and could raise serious implications.
“It
stops being about immigration when we are talking about trying to take
away the citizenship of children being born in the United States,” said
Krystal Gomez, an immigration
lawyer in Austin who formerly headed the American Civil Liberties Union
Texas office in Brownsville. “At that point, it is not even
anti-immigrant. It is anti-Latino.”
Rights vs. Security
Both
sides of the case are expected in a federal courtroom in Austin as
early as October, when U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman will consider
whether to order the state
Health Department to immediately end its practice of denying birth
certificates to parents based on its policies while the case is pending.
Lawyers
with the Texas Civil Rights Project and Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid,
which are representing the parents, filed the emergency request last
month, arguing the agency
is causing their children irreparable harm and creating a group of
second-class citizens. A certified copy of a birth certificate, they
say, is needed to enroll children in school and help them get access to
government services, such as Medicaid.
Named
in the lawsuit along with the Department of State Health Services are
Kirk Cole, its interim commissioner; the Vital Statistics Unit; and the
head of that division,
Geraldine Harris. The state agency sets the policy, but it is local
vital statistics offices that issue the birth certificates.
Texas
officials said the rules secure the identities of Texans. Attorney
General Ken Paxton, whose office is defending the state, has sought to
have the case dismissed.
In his response to the latest request from the plaintiffs, Paxton says
the policy is necessary, “facially neutral and non-discriminatory.”
At
the center of contention is the “matricula consular,” a photo
identification card issued by consulates from Mexico and Central
American countries in the United States
to their foreign citizens living in the country. Chris Van Deusen, a
health department spokesman, said the agency’s policy is to not accept
these consular cards as a verifying documents to secure a copy of a
birth certificate for a child.
“However,
local registrars — and there are more than 400 of them around the state
— I can’t say that they’ve never accepted them or what each local
registrar policy has
been over the years," he said
“It is simply incorrect that we do not verify.”
The
cards first came under scrutiny in the aftermath of the Sept. 11
terrorist attacks, when federal authorities said the Mexican government
had given out multiple matriculas
with different identities to the same person and had no centralized
database to track or crosscheck who had received one.
The
Mexican government says it implemented such a system in 2006, which now
allows consular employees to see what other forms of identification the
applicant has filed
and received, and keeps scanned versions of previous documents on file.
“It
is simply incorrect that we do not verify,” said Carlos González
Gutiérrez, consul general of Mexico in Austin. “It is also incorrect to
say we don’t have a national
database.”
Despite
that, the Texas Department of State Health Services concluded in 2008
that the consular cards were unreliable because consulates don’t
authenticate the documents
presented by applicants.
Two
years later, it reiterated its policy in a handbook for local
registrars, Van Deusen said. Since then, the department has cracked down
on local vital statistics offices
that have accepted those forms of identification as found through its
yearly audits.
Barring U.S. Citizens
Jennifer
Harbury, a Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid lawyer, said she started seeing
the department slam the door on more parents in the summer of 2012 after
the creation of
the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which allowed
eligible immigrants who entered the country unlawfully before the age of
16 to receive renewable two-year work permits.
Enforcement
of the policy kicked up again last summer, immigration lawyers said,
after thousands of children and young people fleeing gang violence and
poverty in Mexico
and Central America began arriving at the Texas-Mexico border.
Harbury
said she reached out to local vital statistics offices and realized the
issues were not isolated and that the only solution was to file a
lawsuit. Four families
were part of the original complaint. Now nearly 30 — hailing from
Brownsville, McAllen, Edinburg and across the Valley — have asked the
lawyers for help.
In
affidavits, the parents chronicle their stories and frustrations with
discrepancies that have sent them in loops of bureaucracy. Many worry
about getting their children
into school and losing food stamps and Social Security benefits. One
mother said her son has not been allowed to return from the Mexican
border city of Reynosa without a birth certificate.
Some
of the parents say they received birth certificates for their
first-born children using the consular cards and were denied years later
with the same identification
after the birth of another child.
“The
Fourteenth Amendment is there to protect all people, especially
minorities and the disfavored, from being punished or treated as
scapegoats.”
Jennifer Harbury, Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid lawyer
An
American-Statesman analysis of the Texas health department records
reveals that even the audits have resulted in varying consequences.
Brownsville, for example, was
audited in 2011 but was not faulted for accepting consular cards until
2014 and again in 2015.
Dallas
County, which was reviewed by the department in 2011 and 2014 without
being faulted, was swept into the debate in June when it announced it
would no longer take
the matricula consular as proof of identity. The decision prompted
Dallas school district officials to reassure parents who could not
receive birth certificates for their children that their sons and
daughters would not be pulled out of school if the missing
documentation could not be immediately produced.
In
Austin and Travis County, where local registrars accept the matricula
cards as long as parents also have other verifying documents, officials
said they had seen “a
huge uptick” in applications from families in other cities where the
cards were not accepted, according to emails among county officials
obtained by the American-Statesman.
But
their policies may soon change. In the emails, officials were told to
prepare for calls from constituents as city and county registrars were
expecting to receive an
edict from the state requiring them to abide by the state restrictions
on the card. As of Wednesday, city and county officials said no such
notice had been delivered.
The
bottom line, the plaintiff’s lawyers say, is that the children were
undoubtedly born in the United States and therefore have constitutional
rights, regardless of the
documents presented by their parents.
“The
Fourteenth Amendment is there to protect all people, especially
minorities and the disfavored, from being punished or treated as
scapegoats,” Harbury said.
Mexican
nationals wait at the Mexican consul general's office in Austin for
their passports and consular cards to be processed Sept. 18. (Ralph
Barrera/American-Statesman)
International attention
The
Mexican government, which in August filed a brief siding with the
plaintiffs, says the state’s policy not only violates U.S. laws but
international rights to identity.
By not taking internationally accepted forms of identification, such as
a passport, experts said, Texas is interfering in the federal
government’s jurisdiction over immigration and hindering relations
between Mexico and the United States.
“One
of the reasons the courts have strictly treated immigration as a
federal policy area — and that federal policy preempts state policy — is
that immigration does have
foreign relations implications,” said Marc Rosenblum of the
Washington-based Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank.
“Texas shouldn’t be doing things that damage that relationship.”
Texas
accepts foreign passports as verifying documents but only if they are
accompanied by current U.S. visas, which Van Deusen, the health
department spokesman, said
it does to verify authenticity. Critics say it creates barriers for
unauthorized immigrants.
González
Gutiérrez, the Austin-based Mexican consul general, said Texas seems to
be the only state not accepting Mexican passports without current visas
in the application
for a birth certificate, and added that Mexican consulates in the state
are tracking the denials.
“One
of the reasons the courts have strictly treated immigration as a
federal policy area — and that federal policy preempts state policy — is
that immigration does have
foreign relations implications.”
Marc Rosenblum, Washington-based Migration Policy Institute
Guatemalan and Honduran foreign ministries in Texas, which have citizens who have joined the suit, are doing the same.
“We
expect a country’s authorities to recognize and honor our passports
just like we recognize and honor their citizens carrying its passports
in our country,” González
Gutiérrez said.
The
Mexican government is also interested in the debate over the
“matricula” cards. Over the past decade, its foreign ministry has
lobbied U.S. governments at the local,
state and federal level to accept the “matricula” cards as valid and
has beefed up the card’s security to address concerns.
But
while Texas and foreign ministries go back and forth about the card’s
security, Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Washington-based
Center for Immigration Studies,
an independent think tank whose research often calls for more
restrictive immigration policies, said the more serious issue is the use
of the cards to legitimize people who are in the country illegally.
“The
matricula card is exclusively for illegal aliens,” Krikorian said. “The
only people who need that card for ID are illegal aliens. Everyone
who’s here legally has
some other form of ID.”
The
Mexican “matricula” card is available to any Mexican citizen in the
United States as proof of their Mexican nationality and foreign
residence. It does not impact or
take into account a person’s immigration status, but often, the card is
the only form of identification available to unauthorized immigrants
who may have lost their personal documents — or were told to dump them
by the people who led them into the country
— during arduous journeys north.
The
acceptance of the card by some government entities in the United States
but not others has led to confusion and a battle over identity
nationwide. In the face of continued
inaction over immigration at the federal level, lawyers and analysts
said, state governments are taking matters into their own hands by
loosening or tightening regulations for immigrants on policies across
the board.
“They become a little less undocumented. It’s like a little bit of amnesty every time they use the card.”
This
year, California enacted a law allowing unauthorized immigrants access
to driver’s licenses. Virginia’s attorney general began granting
in-state tuition to some unauthorized
immigrants in 2014. Texas, which was the first state to allow them
in-state tuition in 2001, narrowly avoided a vote to repeal that
legislation this year and approved a new $800 million budget to tighten
security at its border with Mexico.
Still,
Krikorian said he’s torn about Texas’ birth certificate requirements.
Although he does not believe that children of people who entered the
country illegally should
be automatically granted citizenship as the Fourteenth Amendment
guarantees, that is the law of the land and should not be blocked by a
state policy, he said.
“The more I think of it, the more I come down against the Texas argument, reluctantly,” Krikorian said.
Accepting
the consular cards for the sole purpose of obtaining a copy of a birth
certificate doesn’t legitimize an unauthorized immigrant’s residency,
Krikorian said,
only that of the U.S.-born child. But, he said, allowing the cards for
any other reason — to obtain a driver’s license or open a bank account,
for example — would be problematic.
“Those
really do legitimize a person’s status,” Krikorian said. “They become a
little less undocumented. It’s like a little bit of amnesty every time
they use the card.”
Juana
went three times to the vital statistics office in Edinburg to ask for a
copy of her daughter’s birth certificate. The first time, she presented
her consular card,
the second her Mexican passport and the third, she brought them both,
along with Ellie’s hospital records and documents to verify their home
address.
Each
time, she said, she was turned away. She felt discriminated against and
alone in her battle. Then she sought legal help and felt empowered to
meet other mothers in
her situation.
In
Ellie, who is almost 2, Juana, a single parent and a farmworker, sees
hope for a better life, like the one that she envisioned for herself
when she immigrated to the
United States as a teen almost 20 years ago. But without a birth
certificate, Juana has had difficulty enrolling Ellie in preschool and
fears the child could lose her Medicaid coverage.
The health department is hindering her future, the mother said.
“The
state does not ask me about my legal status when I pay my taxes, nor
does it ask me about my status when I pay my bills,” she said. “I’ve
contributed my part to this
country. I’ve helped put food on people’s tables. I cannot leave my
daughter without a birth certificate.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment