New York Times
By Michael Shear and Julia Preston
October 14, 2015
The
prime-time assertion of executive power was audacious and far-reaching.
Nearly a year ago, President Obama vowed that his administration would
provide up to four million
undocumented immigrants the ability to live and work in the United
States without fear of immediate deportation.
It almost certainly will not happen for the vast majority of them.
The
conservative legal campaign against the centerpiece of Mr. Obama’s
immigration overhaul has largely succeeded in running out the clock,
blocking the president’s executive
actions from taking effect while judges consider their legality. Now,
even if Mr. Obama ultimately prevails in the legal battle — which would
occur next summer at the earliest — there will probably be time for at
most a few hundred thousand of those immigrants
to qualify for protection before the end of the president’s term.
Worse
for the administration, in the next few weeks, the states fighting to
stop Mr. Obama may score their biggest victory yet — achieving a
long-enough delay in the lower
courts to prevent the Supreme Court from even considering and ruling on
the case until after next year’s presidential election. That timing
would leave any final decision about immigration to Mr. Obama’s
successor.
The
immediate holdup is the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit, in New Orleans, where a three-judge panel has been deliberating
the president’s actions
for more than three months — far longer than the court’s goal to decide
“within 60 days after argument” in most cases. White House officials
are bracing for a loss in the appeals court, in part because two of the
three judges have already ruled against the
administration in an earlier decision.
But
Mr. Obama needs a ruling soon from that panel so his lawyers can try to
persuade the Supreme Court to take the case. If the decision does not
come quickly, his hopes
for a late-hour appeal to the Supreme Court this year will disappear.
Already,
disappointed immigration activists are preparing a fallback strategy to
try to turn the fate of Mr. Obama’s promise into a political issue on
the 2016 campaign
trail. Their goal is to motivate immigrants who are citizens to vote by
focusing on what the activists say is the once-in-a-lifetime chance
that has slipped away for millions who are undocumented.
Starting Wednesday, about a dozen protesters will fast for nine days in the park across from the Fifth Circuit courthouse.
“The
lack of action is taking on the tenor of political behavior that is
unconscionable for a federal court,” said Kica Matos, the director of
immigrant rights and racial
justice for the Center for Community Change, an organizer of the
protest. “We want to let the court know that we are watching. It is not
acceptable to us that they are going to run out the clock to achieve
political goals.”
The
extended legal delays have upended the president’s hope for a final
legacy-making success on immigration. After years of a fruitless battle
with House Republicans
to pass a comprehensive overhaul of the nation’s immigration laws, Mr.
Obama last year concluded that he should, and could, act on his own. He
announced his plans in a speech to the nation on Nov. 20.
But
the president’s advisers urged him to move quickly to establish the
program, known as Deferred Action for Parents of Americans. If millions
signed up by the time Mr.
Obama left office, they said, the next president would find it
difficult to reverse, even if a Republican wins the White House.
Aides
mapped out a plan to build a new bureaucracy to process millions of
applications from undocumented immigrants. Officials quickly signed a
$7.8 million lease for
a Washington-area building and began interviews to hire 1,000 new
employees. Those efforts were scuttled when a Texas judge ordered a halt
to the program.
Officials
say they are prepared to begin that process again quickly once they
receive a final go-ahead from the courts. In 2012, it took about 60 days
to set up a similar
but smaller program for undocumented immigrants who were brought to the United States as children. White House aides say they could restart the
latest program in that time.
But the crawl of the legal system is working against them.
Almost
immediately after Mr. Obama announced his executive actions, Texas and
25 other states filed a lawsuit seeking to stop him. In February, Judge
Andrew S. Hanen of
Federal District Court in Brownsville, Tex., ordered a preliminary
injunction on the programs while he considered the constitutional and
other issues in the suit. The government appealed, but the Fifth Circuit
panel hearing that appeal has yet to decide.
The circuit court must decide soon to give the administration the time for a final appeal to the Supreme Court.
“What
is the point of no return?” said Josh Blackman, a law professor at the
South Texas College of Law who filed an appeals court brief opposing the
president’s executive
actions. “As long as we get a decision by the end of October or
beginning of November, the case could be heard by the Supreme Court this
term.”
John
P. Elwood, a lawyer at Vinson & Elkins who follows Supreme Court
procedures closely, said the Obama administration might have a few more
weeks than that — until late
November — to be heard in the current term once the Fifth Circuit
rules.
But
lawyers for the State of Texas, whose lawsuit is seeking to stop Mr.
Obama, will then have the right to seek an extension beyond the usual 30
days to file briefs,
another delay that could get in the way of prompt Supreme Court
consideration.
“The
petition seems like it would have to be filed by Nov. 27 or 30, if
Texas is being cooperative,” for the case to be hear in the current
term, Mr. Elwood said.
If
the Supreme Court considers the case this term, activists are counting
on the justices to overturn the lower courts and let Mr. Obama’s
immigration program move forward.
But
the earliest a positive Supreme Court decision is likely to come is in
June 2016, leaving only a few months before the presidential elections.
Add the amount of time
it would take for officials to renew the lease, hire the new employees
and print the documents, and that time shrinks even further.
By
then, the presidential campaign will be at a fever pitch. Officials
would be asking immigrants in the United States illegally to come
forward and apply at the same
time that the Republican candidate for president would probably be
campaigning on a promise to end Mr. Obama’s program.
“That
fear will definitely be there, and there will be people who will wait,”
said Marielena Hincapié, the executive director of the National
Immigration Law Center. But
she added that “a positive Supreme Court decision will be an infusion
of hope and energy for people to come out and vote.”
White
House officials and advocates are pressing forward on parts of the
president’s executive actions that were not blocked by the courts,
including new enforcement priorities
for immigration authorities that have reduced the number of
deportations.
Officials
are also trying to publicize a recent procedural change that could help
hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants who are married to
American citizens
or legal residents to apply for green cards.
“We
have been mobilizing all over the country, we have done hundreds of
meetings and workshops, and our big message to the entire community was
get ready, whenever it
happens,” Ms. Matos said. “When we get closer to the election, the
Republicans may start to realize that they need our votes.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment