The Hill (Op-Ed)
By Brianne Gorod
October 21, 2015
It’s
been nearly a year since President Obama announced his major executive
action on immigration, which would permit certain parents of U.S. citizens and other lawful residents to request deferred deportation. It’s been almost five
months since the program was supposed to go into effect. There are an
estimated 5.5 million people who would be affected by the program. Yet
there’s been no resolution for these families.
The president’s program remains stalled while questions about its
legality work their way through the courts.
And
while there shouldn’t be any question about the legality of the
president’s actions, it seems clear that it’s going to have to be the
Supreme Court that ultimately
says so. But the Supreme Court can’t act until the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issues its decision in the case. It’s
long past time for that court to have ruled.
Back
in May, the Fifth Circuit, by a 2-1 vote, refused to put on hold a
district judge’s decision temporarily halting the implementation of the
President’s actions, which
is often what happens when a lower court makes such a big decision. As
a result, the president’s executive actions have yet to go into
effect.
That
Fifth Circuit ruling back in May wasn’t formally a decision on the
merits, that is, a decision on whether the district court’s opinion
concluding the program was
likely unlawful was right, but the majority opinion discussed the
merits of the case enough to suggest that it agreed with the district
court. So the writing seemed to be on the wall when the Fifth Circuit
announced that the two judges who voted against the
administration in May would be hearing the appeal on the merits in
July. And that July oral argument only seemed to confirm what most
observers had already suspected: the Fifth Circuit will likely be
issuing another 2-1 decision against the administration.
Yet
more than three months later the country, not to mention all of the
families that would be affected by the president’s executive action, are
still waiting for that
decision. The delay is almost as inexplicable as it is problematic.
It’s
inexplicable because the court surely could have issued an opinion by
now. The Fifth Circuit has said it “attempts to reach a decision within
60 days after” oral
argument, and in 2014, it met that goal, with the median time between
oral argument and opinion in civil cases just 1.8 months. To be sure,
even if this case is more complicated than many the Fifth Circuit hears,
there can be no doubt that two of the judges
on the panel were very familiar with the issues in the case well before
oral argument. After all, they wrote the opinion that discussed them
back in May. And the Fifth Circuit has already recognized that the case
is an important one that should be resolved
as expeditiously as possible; that’s why it expedited the parties’
briefing in the case.
It’s
problematic because the Supreme Court cannot take up this case until
the Fifth Circuit rules. And if the Fifth Circuit doesn’t issue its
opinion soon, the Supreme
Court might not be able to hear the case this Term. That means it’s
possible there would not be a decision from the Court until June of
2017, after the next President has been elected. By that point, the
entire case could be moot if the next president decides
to pursue a different course of executive action.
And
throughout that entire period, a district court decision will have been
left in place, even though it is fundamentally wrong.
When President
Obama announced this
executive action, he was simply doing what presidents of both parties
do all the time in all kinds of contexts; he was providing guidance on
how the laws that Congress has already passed should be applied in light
of the nation’s enforcement priorities and
available resources. Exercising this kind of discretion is especially
critical in the immigration context, given that there are roughly 11.3
million undocumented immigrants in this country, and Congress has only
provided enough money to remove about 400,000
per year.
The
administration’s action was unquestionably lawful, but the families
that should be benefitting from the president’s action are still waiting
for answers from the nation’s
legal system. It’s time for the Fifth Circuit to rule. These families
may not get the answers they want from that court, but they should get
it from the nation’s highest court.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment