Huffington Post
By Roque Planas
August 4, 2015
Many
Latino groups and immigrant rights activists found little to like in a
six-point immigration proposal released by former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush
(R) on Monday, ahead
of the Republican presidential candidates' forum in New Hampshire.
Though
Bush prefaces his proposal with a nod toward enacting a rigorous
process to allow undocumented immigrants to achieve “legal status,” all
of the six points refer
to either ramping up border security or interior enforcement of
immigration law.
The
bullet points offer a ringing endorsement of the conservative agenda on
immigration. The proposal calls for multiplying the Border Patrol’s
forward operating bases,
expanding the use of surveillance technology on the border and
deporting more people who overstay visas.
His
plan also calls for cracking down on sanctuary cities like New York and
San Francisco, which have more lenient policies toward undocumented
immigrants, by withholding
federal law enforcement funds unless they enact more hard-line
policies. Conservatives have decried such policies in the wake of the
death of Kathryn Steinle allegedly at the hands of an undocumented
immigrant in San Francisco.
Bush
has played up his ties to the Latino community in his home state of
Florida, which boasts a large Hispanic population. He highlights his
marriage to Mexican-born
Columba on his campaign website, speaks fluent Spanish and has
discussed one of his son’s encounters with racism.
Many Latino groups aren't fond of the immigration proposal released by GOP presidential candidate Jeb Bush.
But
Matt Barreto, the co-founder and managing partner of the pollster
Latino Decisions, said Bush’s immigration plan would likely fall flat
with most Latino voters, who
overwhelming support immigration reform with a pathway to citizenship.
“Jeb
Bush's latest immigration plan seems to focus entirely on so-called
border security with very little detail on how and when he would address
undocumented immigrants
already living in the U.S.,” Barreto said in an email to HuffPost.
“This will be a major source of tension with Latino voters. In our
previous polling, only 13 percent of Latino voters agreed with Bush that
legal status should be contingent on border security.
Instead, 81 percent of Latino voters said legal status for immigrants
should start right away, alongside any border security measures.”
Some
progressives, such as Executive Director of Presente Action Arturo
Carmona, deride what they see as a lopsided proposal that caters
primarily to hard-liners.
“The
only thing he’s offering is border militarization and interior
enforcement,” Carmona said. “Donald Trump says that Latinos and Mexicans
are rapists and murderers,
but his solution is to build a border wall. Bush is essentially
espousing the same policies based on border enforcement -- he’s just
doing it with different language.”
The
deputy vice president of the National Council of La Raza, Clarissa
Martinez, likened the problem of immigration reform to a stool with
three legs: enforcement, the
legal immigration system and addressing undocumented people already
living here.
“Right
now, Bush’s proposal pretty much only deals with one leg of the stool,”
Martinez told HuffPost. “We were hoping to see more. This proposal is
incomplete and we’re
hoping to see the other parts of it.”
The
emphasis on border security also clashes with the consistent decline in
illegal crossings over the U.S.-Mexico border and the doubling of
Border Patrol agents over
President Barack Obama’s terms in office, Martinez added, noting that
Bush’s outlook in that regard reflected that of much of the U.S.
Congress. Apprehensions for illegally crossing the border stood at
487,000 last year -- less than a third of the 1.7 million
apprehensions in 2000.
Immigrant
detainees walk through the Immigration and Customs Enforcement
detention facility on Feb. 28, 2013, in Florence, Arizona. Many Latino
groups and immigrant rights
organizations criticized Jeb Bush's immigration proposal for failing to
address in detail the status of undocumented people living in the
country.
Others,
however, view Bush’s proposal as strategic. Alfonso Aguilar, the
executive director of the Latino Partnership at the American Principles
Project and the chief
of the U.S. Office of Citizenship during the George W. Bush
administration, said the only way immigration reform will pass is if
advocates address conservative demands to ramp up border security.
“What
a lot of immigration advocates don’t appreciate is that in order to
pass immigration reform, you have to work with conservative Republicans
in Congress,” Aguilar
told HuffPost. “Bush understands that he’s in a Republican primary.
He’s articulating a plan at this time in the political process that
addresses the concerns of the conservative base ... This is how you
build consensus.”
For
Juan Hernández -- a co-founder of the Hispanic Republicans of Texas,
who said his comments reflect his personal views rather than the
organization’s -- the most important
part of Bush’s immigration proposal is that it comes from someone who
understands the issue on a personal level and is willing to compromise.
“In
that discussion of immigration, we’re talking about our friends and
family members,” Hernández told HuffPost. “And a harsh attitude is not
one we’re willing to consider.
Bush comes with his heart first and then talks about how we can
realistically -- in the 21st century, after Sept. 11, with the Congress
that we have -- pass a law.”
To
many undocumented immigrants, Bush’s proposal strikes an even more
personal note. Juan Escalante, a 26-year-old immigrant rights activist
who lives in Tallahassee,
Florida, and is undocumented, said when he evaluates candidates' views
on immigration, he tries to imagine how his mother would respond.
“If
my mother saw this, her first question would be, ‘When can I get in
line? How can I apply to relief?’” Escalante told The Huffington Post.
“If I showed this to her,
she’s not going to have an answer to that. That’s just the honest truth
… At the end of the day, it’s essentially an immigration enforcement
plan.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment