NPR
Adrian Florido
August 22, 2015
Republican
presidential candidate Donald Trump repeatedly referred to "criminal
aliens" and "illegal aliens" in the immigration plan he released on
Sunday. "Alien," and
especially "illegal alien," have become such staples in the vocabulary
of conservative pundits and politicians that many immigrant rights
advocates now reject those terms as derogatory and dehumanizing.
But it wasn't always like that.
Take
this excerpt from a letter that a group of Mexican-American law
students wrote to the editor of the Los Angeles Times in 1970. They sent
it after the paper ran an
editorial with a headline that included the term "wetback."
"We
are still faced with insensitive and racist terms, such as wetback, to
refer to Mexican nationals who have entered the country illegally," the
students wrote, "and
we are now educating the public to use terms like illegal aliens or
illegal entrants."
The
language of immigration was shifting, as it had several times before
the students wrote that letter, and as it has several times since.
According to an analysis by
University of California Berkeley sociologist Edwin Ackerman, within a
few years of that letter, "illegal alien" had indeed become the
preferred term for major newspapers. It largely replaced "wetback,"
which dominated during the 50s and 60s, and which itself
had displaced "undesirables," a popular Depression-era term.
One
of the big findings of Ackerman's scholarship on this issue is that
these shifts don't just happen. The terms that dominate public
immigration debates result from
the deliberate choices of key political players. These choices
sometimes have unintended consequences.
The
shift in perception about "illegal alien" is one example. By the late
60s, Ackerman says, the number of people entering the U.S. illegally
from Mexico was on the rise.
At the same time, the civil rights movement was pressing to make racist
terms like "wetback" unacceptable in public discourse. "That's partly
why the language of illegality begins to pick up steam," Ackerman says.
"Because it has this supposed neutrality to
it."
The
perception of "illegal alien" as neutral is reflected in the broad
array of groups that adopted the term. The Immigration and
Naturalization Service used it in the
70s when it sought a bigger budget for border enforcement. So did labor
union officials who testified before Congress about the importance of
protecting U.S.-born workers.
But
groups sympathetic to immigrants also embraced "illegal alien," like
those Chicano law students from UCLA who wrote to the L.A. Times. Ronald
Reagan used the term
when, in a 1984 debate with Walter Mondale, he declared his support for
amnesty for millions of immigrants who were in the country illegally.
It
allows you to speak of a certain group of people, and everybody knows
what particular group of people that is, without having to recourse to
any sort of racist language.
Sociologist Edwin Ackerman, on the use of terms like "alien"
All
of these groups adopted the term to purse their particular interests.
But in the process, Ackerman says, they had begun to frame the
immigration debate in terms of
"legality" and "illegality." Some, like the Chicano students, did it
unintentionally, Ackerman says. Others, like the anti-immigration groups
that formed in the 70s and 80s, did it on purpose, often using the term
pejoratively.
By
the 90s, "illegal alien" was widely considered demeaning. And because
it was most often used to refer to immigrants from Mexico, Ackerman says
it had become code for
bigotry. "It allows you to speak of a certain group of people, and
everybody knows what particular group of people that is, without having
to recourse to any sort of racist language," he says. Immigrant
advocates started using terms like "illegal immigrant,"
and eventually, "undocumented immigrant."
That
shift is still underway, and appears to be gaining steam. Most major
news organizations (including NPR) now discourage or ban the use of
"illegal alien" in their
newsrooms. Earlier this month, California governor Jerry Brown signed a
bill that deletes the word "alien" from the state's labor code.
The
bill was sponsored by Democratic state senator Tony Mendoza, who said
he hopes other states, and eventually the federal government, will
follow his lead in making
"alien" a term of the past.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment