AP
August 23, 2015
The
debate over a controversial proposal to end the automatic granting of
citizenship to children of people in the U.S. illegally is a distraction
from what the nation
really needs to do to stem the tide of illegal immigration, several
Republican presidential candidates said Sunday.
On
the television network news talk shows, the GOP hopefuls said enforcing
U.S. immigration laws would resolve the problem of "birthright citizenship" without having to
go through what they see as an impractical effort to end it with a
constitutional amendment.
Every
campaign, candidates "hold up some bright, shiny object_'Oh, let's talk
about birthright citizenship,'" Carly Fiorina said on NBC's "Meet the
Press." ''Let us focus
our political energies on doing what the government is responsible for
doing, secure the border, and fix the legal immigration system."
The
former Hewlett-Packard CEO said the federal government cannot keep
track of foreign visitors who overstay visas and has failed at putting
into place a system for employers
to verify the legal status of prospective workers.
Appearing
on CBS's "Face the Nation," New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who opposes
amending the Constitution over birthright citizenship, echoed Fiorina.
He said the issue
is "an applause line."
"Let's talk about the things that we can fix and fix simply without having to amend the Constitution," said Christie.
Native-born
children of immigrants -- even those living illegally in the U.S. -- have
been automatically considered American citizens since the adoption of
the 14th Amendment
in 1868. Donald Trump further roiled the waters of the Republican
campaign when he called for repealing the amendment.
Wisconsin
Gov. Scott Walker, who has gone back and forth on amending the
Constitution over birthright citizenship, told ABC's "This Week" that
he's against any such repeal.
"Any
discussion that goes beyond securing the border and enforcing the laws
are things that should be a red flag to voters out there, who for years
have heard lip service
from politicians and are understandably angry because those politicians
haven't been committed to following through on those promises."
The
call to secure the border as a first priority is a familiar one in the
GOP field. It has at times become a way to avoid taking a stand on more
contentious immigration
issues, such as whether the millions of people in the country illegally
should be offered a path to citizenship or at least legal status.
Dr.
Ben Carson, speaking on CNN's "State of the Union," dismissed the idea
that the controversial use of the term "anchor baby" -- a child born in
the United States to parents
in the country illegally -- was a racial slur. "It's silly political
correctness," he said.
"Everybody
knows what we are talking about," said Carson, who is black. "We need
to talk about the actual issue, and stop getting pulled off into the
weeds, and saying,
you can use this term, you can't use that term."
Carson
said last week that "if somebody comes here for the purpose of having a
baby, so that they have an anchor baby, we should keep that family
together and send them
back where they come from."
Texas
Sen. Ted Cruz said enforcing existing immigration laws would solve the
problem without having to amend the Constitution, a process he said
would take years to accomplish.
Indeed,
the odds of repealing the amendment's citizenship clause would be
steep, requiring the votes of two-thirds of both houses of Congress and
support from three-fourths
of the nation's state legislatures.
Republicans
in Congress have repeatedly failed since 2011 to pass bills aimed at
ending "birthright citizenship." Some conservatives believe that the
granting of citizenship in such cases could be changed without amending the Constitution.
Former
Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Ohio Gov. John Kasich last week spoke in
favor of leaving the constitutional protection in place.
Bush
supports greater enforcement to stop pregnant women from crossing the
border to have their children in the U.S., but says people born in the
United States should
be U.S. citizens.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment