Buzzfeed News
By Adrian Carrasquillo
August 19, 2015
Hillary
Clinton’s campaign is bolstering its growing Latino outreach apparatus,
tapping polling firm Latino Decisions to gauge attitudes of the
Hispanic community, two
sources tell BuzzFeed News.
The
firm, led by political scientists and professors Matt Barreto and Gary
Segura, has worked with immigration groups and unions like America’s
Voice and SEIU, as well
as National Council of La Raza, Univision and the progressive Center
for American Progress on polls.
The
deal came through after weeks of back and forth negotiations between
Latino Decisions and the campaign. Only Segura and Barreto are joining
the Clinton team and the
campaign contacted other contenders for the Latino polling role to tell
them of its decision. The Clinton campaign did not respond to a request
for comment by publication.
While
the pollsters have been hired by groups on the left, they have not
shied away from being critical of the Democratic Party, particularly
after the disastrous 2014
midterm election and also presented an immigration stance Clinton
eventually embraced at a major Nevada event during the Spring.
Latino
Decisions found that 2014 featured low turnout and enthusiasm for
Hispanic voters, compared to the 2010 midterm, and said it should be a
wake-up call to Democrats
to work hard to connect with Latinos, arguing that doing just that
helped Sen. Harry Reid in Nevada in 2010 and Obama in 2012.
In
a February presentation to the DNC’s Hispanic caucus entitled “Winning
The Latino Vote In A Post-Obama Environment,” Barreto said broad support
of Clinton by Hispanic
voters hinged on whether she would embrace Obama’s 2012 and 2014 executive actions on immigration or reject them.
In
May, Clinton said she supported Obama’s executive actions to shield
millions of undocumented immigrants, which included parents of U.S.
citizens, from deportation and
said she would go further if Congress won’t take up an immigration
overhaul.
Democrats
said the hire further signaled that the campaign will work hard to
understand Latino attitudes, which differ among ethnic groups and across
states, from Florida
to Nevada.
Andres
Ramirez, a 20-year Nevada veteran strategist, said many pollsters have
similar techniques but “there’s a difference when you’re working with a
firm that understands
the political and cultural nuances of a particular constituency group.”
He
cited the call centers organizations use to call prospective voters and
said Latino Decisions knows, for example, that having “a Cuban in Miami
call a Chicano voter
in LA” isn’t a good idea because they might not be as forthcoming
speaking to someone who doesn’t sound like them and because the answers
could be misinterpreted by the caller.
Democrats
noted that this was the first time Latino Decisions was joining a
campaign, giving Clinton props for bringing on a group that has never
work at this level before.
Latino Decisions
Hispanic
conservatives were good-natured in their ribbing of Latino Decisions,
with Republican strategist Luis Alvarado saying “I guess the jig is up”
and Alfonso Aguilar,
a former official in the George W. Bush administration, adding this was
“their coming out” as Democratic pollsters.
But Aguilar, who has met Barreto, said Democrats would be wise to listen to him.
“I
think he’s objective, he’ll open the eyes of Democrats and say ‘If you
think you have a hold on the Latino vote you better think again,’” he
said. “That’s the value
Matt has.”
Like
all pollsters, Latino Decisions has been right and wrong. In 2010, Nate
Silver wrote about how polls had underestimated Latino support for
Harry Reid over Sharron
Angle, after hearing from Barreto.
But
in 2014, the polling firm floated that former Colorado senator Mark
Udall was winning his race against Cory Gardner because the Latino vote
was being miscalculated.
Gardner
won the race, with a later joint Latino Decisions/NCLR/America’s Voice
poll saying Udall didn’t do enough to differentiate himself from his
opponent on immigration.
In
their 2014 book, Latino America, Segura and Barreto argued that
American politics in the 21st century will be shaped in large part “by
how Latinos are incorporated
into the political system.”
The
duo looked at how Latino attitudes differ across generational lines,
whether they’re immigrants or U.S. born, ethnicity, and in how they view
the role of government.
They also analyzed the 2008 Democratic primary between Obama and Clinton.
It’s
often forgotten that Clinton beat Obama 2-to-1 among Hispanic voters in
2008, and Latino Decisions said her standing with them never wavered,
because “three out of
four Latino primary voters liked Hillary Clinton,” giving her a strong
advantage.
In
the book, Hispanic voters are called her “Latino firewall,” and her win
in Texas, where the electorate was 33% Hispanic, helped her extend the
hard fought primary.
Now
with Bernie Sanders showing strength, Nevada and its one-third Latino
electorate could serve a similar purpose, with the campaign bringing on
operatives with experience
in Nevada, like state director Emmy Ruiz, organizing director Jorge
Neri, and Hispanic media director Jorge Silva, who joined this week from
Reid’s office.
In
their book, Barreto and Segura said Clinton’s strong performance could
be credited to her extraordinary name recognition and effective Latino
outreach effort.
Seven years later, the group is joining that effort.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment