New York Times
By Julia Preston
November 15, 2014
Changes
to the immigration enforcement system that President Obama is expected
to announce as early as this week could offer legal documents to as many
as five million immigrants in the country
illegally, nearly double the number who received protection from
deportation under amnesty legislation in 1986.
Unlike
that law, which gave permanent-resident green cards to 2.7 million
immigrants, Mr. Obama’s executive actions will not provide any formal,
lasting immigration status, much less a pathway
to citizenship.
The
actions will, however, have a large and, White House officials hope,
swift impact on the daily lives of many immigrant families, removing
fears that relatives could be separated from one
another by deportations. Many immigrants will also receive work
permits, which will give them Social Security numbers and allow them to
work legally under their own names and travel within the United States,
although not abroad. In some states, they will be
able to get driver’s licenses and professional certificates.
While
the practical effect of the measures could therefore be broad, legally
they will be limited, providing only temporary reprieves from
deportation. Congress could change the laws that
Mr. Obama will rely on for his actions, and a future president could
cancel the program, leaving immigrants out in the open and even more
exposed to removal.
Mr.
Obama said he had decided to take the measures after an immigration
overhaul passed by the Senate died this year in the
Republican-controlled House. His plans to act unilaterally have
infuriated Republicans newly empowered in the midterm elections, who
say they earned a chance at the polls to write their own immigration
legislation in the Congress they will control next year.
The
House speaker, John A. Boehner of Ohio, said that Republicans would
“fight the president tooth and nail,” and that they were weighing
whether to try to cripple Mr. Obama’s plans with legal
challenges or halt them by canceling their funding.
But
the White House is planning a quick start, according to officials
familiar with the plans. It is breaking eligible immigrants into
staggered groups, some of which will begin applying for
deportation deferrals within a few months. If that happens, Republicans
will have to decide whether to shut down programs that are already
bringing immigrants out from underground and giving their families
relief from the constant threat of separation.
According
to administration officials familiar with the plans, the president will
give deportation deferrals and work permits to people in the country
illegally whose children are American
citizens or legal permanent residents, if the parents have lived here
for at least five years. As many as 3.3 million immigrants could be
eligible.
Officials
are hoping that by centering the reprieve program on American citizens
and legal residents, they will blunt some Republican opposition.
Americans cannot be deported from their own
country, and deportations of their parents have left many children
stranded here, often with serious consequences for their social
progress.
The
White House is also considering expanding a program Mr. Obama started
in 2012, called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, which
has given similar reprieves to nearly 600,000
young immigrants who came here as children. More than 700,000
additional young people could become eligible. Officials may also
include the parents of immigrants with DACA deferrals in the new
programs.
White
House officials have declined to comment about the plans. They say no
final decisions have been made on the scope of the programs or whether
they will be announced this week or in December.
Mr.
Obama’s actions will not make it easier for migrants to cross the
southwestern border, like the thousands of youths without their parents
who floated on rafts across the Rio Grande into
South Texas over the summer. Foreigners caught at the border would
still be on the priority list for deportation, administration officials
said, and a primary goal of Mr. Obama’s actions will be to shift
resources and agents to border security that had been
focused on removing immigrants from the interior.
Administration
lawyers said they were preparing their case that enacting such measures
would be within Mr. Obama’s constitutional authority. They cited the
president’s wide latitude in enforcing
the nation’s immigration laws.
Congress
has provided only enough funding for the administration to carry out
about 400,000 deportations each year. Mr. Obama, to the dismay of
immigrant-rights advocates, has met that goal,
removing more than two million immigrants while in office. But with
11.3 million people in the United States illegally, the lawyers’
argument goes, enforcement agents will never be able to deport them all.
The president, officials say, has to devise policies
that allow enforcement agents to go after convicted criminals and
others who pose serious threats to public safety and national security.
“The
system that Congress has created and funded relies heavily on
discretion,” said Hiroshi Motomura, a law professor at the University of
California, Los Angeles, who studies executive powers
in immigration. “The president needs to have enforcement priorities,
and he needs to apply them in a way that is uniform, predictable and
nondiscriminatory.”
Until
now, Mr. Obama had kept deportation numbers high as part of a strategy
to win Republican support for a bill overhauling the immigration system,
leading angry immigrant-rights advocates
to call him “the deporter in chief.” But his approach did not win over
House Republicans, and the federal authorities have struggled to rein in
the pace of enforcement. Now, the president is turning around and
offering wholesale relief to immigrants who officials
say pose no known security or criminal threat.
Republicans
argue that the deportation deferrals Mr. Obama is likely to issue were
intended to be used rarely, for people with compelling needs. By
offering them to millions, they say, he
is blocking immigration agents from enforcing the law.
“This
executive order would be a violation of the president’s oath of office
and a blatant abuse of power,” said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas,
an outspoken opponent of Mr. Obama’s policies.
“The president has sworn an oath of office to uphold the laws, but now
he is planning to rewrite them on his own.”
The
White House is gambling on a surge of support from immigrants and
Latinos that would make Republicans think carefully about how far to go
to halt the programs. Latino groups are mobilized,
pressing the president to include as many as seven million immigrants.
“The
time for big, bold, unapologetic administrative relief is now,” said
José Calderón, president of the Hispanic Federation, a nonprofit
advocacy group.
Despite
the rebuke he received in the elections, Mr. Obama has responded
defiantly to Republicans warning him not to act on his own.
“My
executive actions not only do not prevent them from passing a law that
supersedes those actions,” he said at a news conference on Nov. 5, “but
they should be a spur for them to actually
try to get something done.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment