Los Angeles Times
By Sarah Wire
March 22, 2016
Rep. Zoe Lofgren knew what would happen as hundreds of thousands of children
fled to the United States on their own over the last few years.
Because
being present in the U.S. illegally is a civil offense, there is no
right to an attorney during immigration or asylum proceedings. That
means many children stand alone before an immigration
judge when they ask to stay in this country.
Lofgren
said it’s a problem she has fought for years. In the 1970s, she
practiced immigration law and taught at the Santa Clara University
School of Law. She knew that many who came fleeing
violence would be sent back home because they lacked legal
representation and had no one to advocate for them.
Now
the San Jose Democrat and 54 of her House colleagues have put forth a
bill to argue that, at a minimum, children and people with certain
disabilities should have government-appointed
attorneys to help them navigate the asylum process. Eleven California
Democrats have co-sponsored the bill, which has been referred to the
House Judiciary Committee, where Lofgren is the highest-ranking Democrat
on the Subcommittee on Immigration and Border
Security.
"You've
got a 10-year-old who speaks Spanish and they're in a courtroom facing a
trained prosecutor making the asylum case. It's not going to work,"
Lofgren said in an interview in her Capitol
Hill office. "The consequences of being unable to make your case are
severe."
Since
October 2013, more than 132,000 Central American children and teens
without legal status have been caught near the United States border with
Mexico, according to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection. It isn't yet clear whether that trend will continue this
year, or if federal deportation efforts have caused it to slow.
A
child who goes before an immigration judge without an attorney has a 1
in 10 chance of being allowed to stay, while about half of children with
an attorney get U.S. protection, according
to a study by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at
Syracuse University. About half of unaccompanied children get an
attorney, the analysis shows.
Although
being in the country illegally is a civil offense, being caught
crossing the border can lead to federal criminal charges.
Opponents
of the bill argue that American taxpayers shouldn’t pay for an attorney
to represent a person who came to the country illegally. John Feere,
legal policy analyst for the conservative
Center for Immigration Studies, wrote in a March 15 blog post on the
center’s website that if immigration groups want an attorney for people
in the U.S. illegally, being in the country without legal status should
be made a criminal offense, not a civil one.
“It
can be a difficult situation for children, no doubt, and it's
unfortunate that the parents have put them in that situation. And it's
unfortunate that the Obama administration has encouraged
people to risk their lives crossing the border, but that is precisely
what Deferred Action has done,” Feere said. “There's already a way to
make sure all illegal aliens receive an attorney during their
immigration proceedings: criminalize immigration law.”
Lofgren
said concerns about cost shouldn’t trump due process. She argued that
requiring access to attorneys could help avoid delays and streamline the
process, which would save money. Several
nonprofit groups provide free legal representation to migrant children,
as does a Department of Justice program, though many still end up in
court without an advocate.
Many
immigration judges delay and postpone hearings as they look for an
attorney to represent children seeking asylum, Lofgren said.
"Not
having a lawyer gums up the works," she said. "That costs money and
time. You translate those delays and the cost with those delays over
50,000 cases, it's a lot of money."
Once
a child is detained, Department of Homeland Security asylum officers
perform an initial screening to determine whether the child may have a
valid claim for asylum and should go before
an immigration judge.
"These
kids, most of them, over 90%, were found to have valid claims by the
trained asylum officer. But of course if they weren't represented, they
were unable to actually articulate that
when it came to court," Lofgren said.
Whether
the government must provide attorneys for children and people with
special needs is a question pending in the U.S. District Court for the
Western District of Washington. The American
Civil Liberties Union and immigrant rights groups want to require the
government to provide appointed counsel for every child who cannot
afford a lawyer in immigration court proceedings. The Justice Department
is contesting the lawsuit.
In
a recently unsealed deposition, Judge Jack Weil, an assistant chief
immigration judge for the U.S. Department of Justice, made the case that
migrant children as young as 3 years old are
capable of representing themselves in deportation hearings. Weil’s job
includes coordinating training for other immigration judges and court
staff.
"I've
taught immigration law literally to 3-year-olds and 4-year-olds. It
takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of patience," Weil said. "They get
it. It's not the most efficient, but it can
be done."
Lofgren said the statement was absurd.
"If
you are a mother, it's hard to say how it's fair that a small child
should be left on their own in an important proceeding,” she said.
"There's no other area of the law where that happens."
A
group of immigration lawyers made the same point recently in a video
where they asked children questions they would hear in court.
Lofgren understands her bill may not move far.
"I'm
aware that the Republican leadership may not move the bill, but I do
think it's important to raise the issue legislatively," she said.
The
two other former immigration lawyers in the House, Rep. Bob Goodlatte
(R-Va.) and Raul Labrador (R-Idaho), have not signed onto the bill.
The
Senate’s lone former immigration lawyer, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.),
has co-sponsored the Senate version of the bill led by Sen. Harry Reid
(D-Nev.).
The
United States should give immigrant children a fair day in court, Rep.
Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Downey) said in a statement when the bill was
introduced.
“We
have a moral obligation to ensure these children and other vulnerable
populations seeking our nation’s protection receive due process, and are
not merely deported back to the dangers
and the terrors they risked so much to escape,” she said.
Lofgren says she sees her own kids, now grown, in the faces of children who came to the U.S. alone.
"When
they were 5 they could not have gone into court, faced off with a
trained prosecutor and made a coherent case for asylum in a language
they didn't speak," she said.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment