Bloomberg
By Zachary Mider
March 15, 2016
The
liberal New York financier George Soros, whose effort to unseat
President George W. Bush in 2004 shattered political spending records,
is returning to big-ticket giving after an 11-year
hiatus.
Soros
has spent or committed more than $13 million to support Hillary Clinton
and other Democrats this election cycle, already more than his total
disclosed spending in the last two presidential
elections combined.
Soros
has expressed alarm over the past few months at the candidacies of
Republicans Donald Trump and Ted Cruz. In a statement last week about a
new group he's funding to increase voting
by Latinos and immigrants in the election, he again mentioned the two
candidates by name.
"The
intense anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim rhetoric that has been fueled by
the Republican primary is deeply offensive," Soros said in the
statement. "There should be consequences for the
outrageous statements and proposals that we've regularly heard from
candidates Trump and Cruz."
Michael
Vachon, a spokesman and political adviser to Soros, said there was no
single cause for the increase in spending. "His support of Clinton is
one reason. The tone of the other candidates
is the other," Vachon said. The Clinton, Cruz and Trump campaigns,
which face crucial primary contests in Ohio and Florida today, didn't
respond to requests for comment.
Soros's
importance to Clinton goes beyond the checks he writes, since other
major Democratic donors sometimes follow his lead. At the same time,
it's likely that in a general election, Trump
would pillory Clinton for her reliance on Soros and other wealthy
hedge-fund managers. The billionaire real-estate developer has spent
months portraying his Republican rivals as the tools of their donors.
Soros,
85, a Hungarian-born speculator who made billions betting on price
swings in currencies and other assets, has long been one of the right
wing's favorite bogeymen and a magnet for conspiracy
theories.
Last
weekend, some Trump supporters and conservative media organizations
blamed Soros for demonstrations in Chicago that caused Trump to cancel a
planned rally, pointing to his past support
for one of the groups that organized protests, MoveOn.org. In fact,
MoveOn hasn't gotten funding from Soros since 2004, according to both
Vachon and MoveOn spokesman Brian Stewart.
Soros's
personal fortune stands at about $24 billion, according to the
Bloomberg Billionaires Index. Soros handed off day-to-day management of
his hedge fund business in the late 1980's to
focus on his charitable pursuits, many of which seek to promote
democracy around the world. The Open Society Foundations say they have
spent some $13 billion over the past three decades.
Soros
spent an unprecedented $27 million trying to defeat Bush's re-election
in 2004, much of it through independent groups known as 527s that could
accept donations of unlimited size. While
the groups Soros funded knocked on doors and tried to boost voter
turnout, a conservative 527 group aired a powerful series of ads
questioning Democrat John Kerry's war record, helping Bush win a second
term. "They were in-your-face distortions of the truth,"
a frustrated Soros told the New York Times Magazine in 2006. "People
don't care about the truth."
Soros
signed on as an early backer of Obama during the 2008 campaign, but
spent only about $5 million on political causes that cycle, according to
a tally by Bloomberg that doesn't include
undisclosed donations to political nonprofits. He spent even less in
2012, even though the Supreme Court's
Citizens United ruling prompted a flood of new seven-figure contributions that year.
At
the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland that January, he
remarked to Reuters that some hard-right candidates would provide a big
contrast with Obama but "there isn't all that much
difference" between the president and Mitt Romney, the eventual
Republican nominee. He also remarked that "a lot of the talent has left"
Obama's administration.
A few months later, Soros told a Clinton confidant that he wished he hadn't backed Obama in the primary four years earlier.
"He
said he's been impressed that he can always call/meet with you on an
issue of policy and he hasn't met with the president ever," Neera Tanden
said in a 2012 e-mail to Clinton, who was
then serving as Obama's Secretary of State. "He regretted his decision
in the primary -- he likes to admit mistakes when he makes them and that
was one of them."
The
e-mail was one of thousands of Clinton's messages that the State
Department later made public, several of which show what a warm
reception Soros got from her office. They show him planning
a meeting with Clinton to request funding for a university he supports;
recommending a few names of potential mediators for a crisis in
Albania; and having a long talk with one of her aides about the
situation in Burma. Over the past few years, Soros' charities
have given between $1.5 million and $6 million to the Clinton
Foundation.
Soros's
biggest contribution this year is a total of $7 million to Priorities
USA, the main super-PAC supporting Clinton. Another $1 million went to
American Bridge, an opposition-research
group. And last week, he announced he was putting $5 million into a new
super-PAC known as Immigrant Voters Win. The group is part of a
coordinated $15 million voter-turnout effort, first reported in the New
York Times, that is targeting Latinos and immigrants
in Colorado, Nevada and Florida.
The
$13 million total puts Soros near the top of the list of this election
cycle's biggest donors, and it doesn't include the $5 million he's
pledged to another effort, led by Democratic
lawyer Marc Elias, to challenge new voter-identification laws and other
restrictions at the state level.
In
an era of super-PACs, Soros's giving doesn't stand out like it used to.
Thomas Steyer, the former San Francisco hedge-fund manager, spent more
than $70 million in 2014, and the casino
mogul Sheldon Adelson gave more than $90 million in 2012.
At
Davos in January, Soros remarked that Trump and Cruz are engaging in
"fear mongering." But he predicted that neither of them would prevail in
the November election. "Here I have to confess
to a little bit of bias, so take that into account," he told Bloomberg
Television. "I think it's going to lead to a landslide for Hillary
Clinton."
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment