Wall Street Journal
By Eliot Brown
March 26, 2016
A
controversial federal immigration program offering green cards to some
foreign investors had record demand in 2015, as concern that a key
provision of the law might expire fueled a surge
of aspiring immigrants.
The
program, known as EB-5, received applications from 17,691 investors in
2015, up from 11,744 in 2014 and 6,554 in 2013, according to figures
released last week by U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services.
In
all, there were 21,988 investor applications pending at year-end, and
given that the program allows just 10,000 visas a year, that means a
backlog of at least five years for most investors.
Typically each investor secures two to three visas, including family
members.
That
backlog could make it harder to find future investors, said Nicholas
Mastroianni II, chief executive of the U.S. Immigration Fund, a company
that pools together investors in real estate
that use the program for financing.
While
applications have consistently grown in recent years, demand was
particularly strong at the end of 2015 because a key portion of the EB-5
program was expiring, he said, and the inflow
has slowed some since the law was extended in December for another 10
months.
“It
was a flood to the market,” he said, adding that there is also a
dropoff in demand because of the slowing economy in China, which
accounts for more than 80% of EB-5 visas issued.
The
EB-5 program offers green cards to aspiring immigrants who invest at
least $500,000 into certain businesses that have been determined to
create at least 10 jobs per investor.
First
created in 1990, EB-5 was barely used until the aftermath of the 2008
recession, when real-estate developers realized it offered a cheap and
accessible form of financing when banks
were reluctant to lend. The program has since become mainstream within
the real-estate development world, particularly among high-end
developers in New York, who recruit heavily in China.
Users
include Hudson Yards—the nation’s largest private development, in
Manhattan, which is using more than $1 billion of EB-5 funds—and
numerous high-end condominium towers.
But
these projects have come under fire because they are using a provision
of the program meant to aid rural areas and urban neighborhoods with
high unemployment—a stark contrast given that
many sit on some of the most valuable real estate in the country. This
practice is legal because the law allows developers to draw special
districts that link their projects with poor neighborhoods that hit the
unemployment threshold.
Lawmakers
tried to stop this practice and make numerous other alterations to the
program late last year, including changes meant to reduce the
possibility of fraud.
But
developers and their allies in Congress resisted attempts to change the
rural and high-unemployment provision, and the law was renewed with no
changes through September.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment