The Hill
By Kristina Wong
December 14, 2015
Homeland
Security Secretary Jeh Johnson decided against ending a secret U.S.
policy that prohibits immigration officials from reviewing social media
posts of foreigners
applying for U.S. visas, according to a report by ABC News.
Johnson
decided to keep the prohibition in place in early 2014 because he
feared a civil liberties backlash and “bad public relations,” according
to ABC.
“During
that time period immigration officials were not allowed to use or
review social media as part of the screening process,” John Cohen, a
former acting undersecretary
at the Department of Homeland Security for intelligence and analysis,
told ABC News.
One current and one former senior counterterrorism official confirmed Cohen’s account to ABC.
A
DHS spokesman told ABC News that in the fall of 2014 after Cohen left,
the department began three pilot programs to include social media in
vetting, but officials say
it's still not a widespread policy and a review is underway.
The
scrutiny of the policy comes after U.S. officials learned that Tashfeen
Malik, one of the shooters in San Bernardino, Calif., posted a message
on Facebook declaring
allegiance to the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria before carrying out
an attack that killed 14 people.
Sen.
Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) demanded Sunday that the U.S. immediately
start a program to review social media sites of those admitted on visas.
"Had they checked out Tashfeen Malik ... maybe those people in San Bernardino would be alive," he said, according to ABC News.
Cohen
said he and other U.S. officials had pressed for a policy change in
2014 but top officials with the DHS's Office of Civil Liberties and the
Office of Privacy opposed
it.
"The
primary concern was that it would be viewed negatively if it was
disclosed publicly and there were concerns that it would be
embarrassing," Cohen said in an interview
with "Good Morning America."
"There
is no excuse for not using every resource at our disposal to fully vet
individuals before they come to the United States," he added.
Another
former senior counterterrorism official vouched for Cohen's retelling:
"They felt looking at public postings [of foreign U.S. visa applicants]
was an invasion
of their privacy."
Cohen
said there were concerns over the U.S. government's standing with civil
rights groups and European allies after National Security Agency
contractor Edward Snowden
disclosed surveillance policies.
"It
was primarily a question of optics," Cohen said. "There were concerns
from a privacy and civil liberties perspective that while this was not
illegal, that it would
be viewed negatively if it was disclosed publicly."
DHS
spokeswoman Marsha Catron said the Department is "actively considering
additional ways to incorporate the use of social media review in its
various vetting programs,"
while keeping an eye on privacy concerns.
"The
Department will continue to ensure that any use of social media in its
vetting program is consistent with current law and appropriately takes
into account civil rights
and civil liberties and privacy protections," Catron said.
The
State Department, which helps to screen visa applicants along with the
Department of Homeland Security, occasionally reviews applicants’ social
media accounts, spokesman
John Kirby told reporters on Monday.
“It
is routine for our consular officers to be able to examine social media
presence when they feel it can round out and put a little bit more
flesh on the bone of the
information and the context that they’re trying to gain about people
when applying for visas,” Kirby said.
However,
he warned that privacy settings and the use of pseudonyms — which may
or may have been in place on Malik’s account — can make that process
difficult.
President
Obama last week announced that his administration was reviewing
screening measures of the K-1 fiancée visa program that Malik used to
enter the U.S.
Social
media is “a piece of this process that I think you can safely assume
we’ll be looking out going forward,” Kirby said on Monday, hinting at
the possibility of making
the social media screenings mandatory.
“I don’t want to rule out the fact that there may be changes coming down the pike here, with respect to social media.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment