Washington Post (Monkey Cage)
By Amaney Jamal and Mathew Creighton
December 15, 2015
Riding
a wave of anti-immigrant sentiment to the top of the Republican
primary, Donald Trump recently narrowed his broader xenophobic rhetoric
to something better understood
as Islamophobia. He proposed a full ban on Muslim immigrants, refugees
or otherwise — and two-thirds of registered Republicans agree with him.
But do Republicans reject Muslim immigrants while — at the same time —
welcome Christians? A survey experiment we
conducted offers some unique evidence.
In
a 2010 experiment, which is publicly available, we provided ironclad
conditions of anonymity and allowed a representative sample of the U.S.
population to express their
opposition to citizenship for legal Christian and Muslim immigrants to
the United States. Obviously there is no legal barrier to citizenship
for these groups, but we wanted to see what people say when free of
potential pressure to moderate their opinions.
Our
approach, called a list experiment, was so focused on anonymity that we
cannot ever know how any given participant in our study responded.
Instead, with the help of
some simple mathematics, we can extract the proportion of the total
population opposed to citizenship for Christian and Muslim immigrants.
We’ll call this implicit opposition. We also asked another random sample
to express their opposition directly with no
absolute guarantee of permanent anonymity. We’ll call that explicit
opposition.
When
we looked at the differences between people’s explicit and implicit
opinion, distinguishing the self-identified conservative respondents
from the liberals with moderates
in between. We had previously explored attitudes toward Christian and
Muslim immigrants for the general U.S. population, but what we found
when we considered political orientation surprised us.
Explicit
opposition looked a lot like Donald Trump suggests in that
conservatives are more opposed to Muslim than Christian immigrants.
However, with permanent anonymity
guaranteed, a different picture emerged. Conservatives implicitly
opposed Muslim and Christian immigrants to a somewhat similar extent,
certainly well within the margin of error. Why? Because, relative to
moderates and liberals, conservatives significantly
and substantially masked their opposition to citizenship for Christian
immigrants, but not for Muslims.
Liberals
and moderates hide their opposition, as well, but the degree of masking
is largest among conservatives and most striking given recent public
statements by leading
Republican candidates. The reason for this has a lot to do with what is
considered acceptable to say out loud, called social desirability bias.
In
this climate of unprecedented Islamophobia, conservatives feel it’s
okay to denounce an entire religious faith without exception. And
although conservatives offer a
more hospitable response to Christian immigrants only when apprehensive
that they might be overheard, there is little to no evidence that
Christian immigrants are truly seen as distinct or, moreover, relatively
welcome.
For
those that want to keep out anyone not born in America regardless of
their contribution, religion, culture or need, Donald Trump and possibly
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.)
are their candidates. Nobody even comes close to imagining a future
with such a tightly closed border.
However,
for those who think that conservatives in America are picking and
choosing the immigrants that fit their notion of America, we suggest you
take a closer look.
There is clear evidence that the idea of conservatives’ relative
moderate stances toward Christian immigrants masks old-fashioned,
decades-old bigotry from which few beyond the narrow base they have
cultivated would be immune.
No comments:
Post a Comment