Los Angeles Times
By Lisa Mascaro
July 17, 2015
New
research out Friday shows that Republicans will need a larger slice of
Latino voters than previously thought if they hope to win the White
House in 2016, creating
an even tougher hurdle for the eventual nominee.
Thanks
to changing demographics, the conventional math that once said the GOP
would need to win a minimum of 40% of the Latino electorate no longer
holds.
Now,
data suggests that Republicans will need as much as 47% of Latino
voters -- nearly twice the share that Mitt Romney is believed to have
captured in 2012.
Put another way: 47% is the new 40%. And it is a daunting number.
"It's
very, very, very basic: Every single year, you need a little bit more
of the Latino vote," said Matt Barreto, UCLA political science
professor and co-founder of
the polling firm Latino Decisions. "It's just math."
The
research is based on demographic changes and voter preferences emerging
at a time when older, white voters who have powered Republican nominees
are fading. The growing
Latino electorate is expected to surpass 10% of all voters in 2016, and
younger white voters are trending toward Democrats.
The
findings are likely to scramble Republican strategy circles, because
the top Republican candidates are currently performing no better than
Romney among Latinos --
a problem compounded by celebrity candidate Donald Trump's disparaging
comments about Mexican immigrants.
Jeb
Bush, the former Florida governor, does best with Latinos, at 27%,
according to a Univision poll this week, closely trailed by Sen. Marco
Rubio (R-Fla.) at 25%.
The
new thinking unveiled Friday largely mirrors that of Republican
pollster Whit Ayres, who has argued that the party's 2016 nominee will
need more than 40% of the Latino
vote. He has been tapped by Rubio's campaign.
A look at past elections shows the rough road ahead for the GOP amid the demographic shift.
The
last Republican nominee to hit the 40% threshold was George W. Bush in
2004, who was popular with Latino voters. He went on to win the White
House with 58% of the
white vote, at a time when Latinos were 7% of overall voters.
Romney and John McCain trailed in Latino support and lost the presidency.
Republicans
could stem their reliance on Latino voters if the party's nominee
performed better among whites -- as some GOP strategists are hoping to
do.
But
that strategy could force the candidate to favor more conservative
positions on immigration and other issues for little gain, as history
also shows that the party's
attempt to grow its support among white voters has its limits.
The party's high-water mark with white voters came when Ronald Reagan won 66% of the white electorate in the 1984 landslide.
By 2012, Romney won 59% of white voters against President Obama.
If
the GOP nominee won 60% of the white electorate in 2016, the candidate
would need 42% of the Latino vote to win the White House, the research
shows.
But
if the candidate again topped out at 59% of white voters in 2016, he or
she would need 47% of the Latino vote to make up the difference, the
research said.
Barreto,
who conducted the research for America's Voice, a leading immigration
advocacy group, acknowledged he had been using the old thinking until he
ran the numbers.
"We were blind to this," he said at a briefing Friday in Washington. "We shouldn't use the 40% anymore."
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment