Los Angeles Times
By Mary Ann Toman-Miller
July 21, 2015
The
father of the woman shot to death this month on a San Francisco pier,
allegedly by a man deported five times to Mexico, urged lawmakers
Tuesday to overhaul what he
called “disjointed” immigration laws as Obama administration officials
defended their approach to immigration enforcement.
The
woman, Kathryn Steinle, was walking arm-in-arm with her father July 1
on Pier 14 when she was shot in the chest. The suspect in Steinle’s
death, Juan Francisco Lopez
Sanchez, had seven felonies on his record.
While acknowledging the complexity of immigration reform, Steinle’s father, Jim, urged senators to close legal loopholes.
“Legislation
should be discussed, enacted or changed to take these undocumented
immigrant felons off our streets for good,” Steinle told the Senate
Judiciary Committee.
His daughters final words to him were, “Help me, Dad,” he testified.
The
director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Sarah Saldaña,
defended the Obama administration’s strategy on immigration reform,
including working with local
governments on communicating on handing over inmates.
“We’re
working very hard with a host of jurisdictions, counties and cities,”
Saldaña said, adding that she recognized that the issues and needs of
communities in Texas
are different from those in Los Angeles.
Sanchez
had been released from San Francisco County jail in April after drug
charges against him were dropped. At the time, federal immigration
officials had a standing
request that he be kept in custody 48 hours beyond his release date
until they could take him into custody. But San Francisco is what’s
known as a sanctuary city, meaning city employees are barred from
inquiring into or disclosing a person’s immigration status
short of a warrant or court order.
Anti-immigration
activists have seized on Steinle’s death as an example of the need for
more stringent enforcement of immigration laws. Sen. Dianne Feinstein
(D-Calif.)
was adamant during Tuesday’s hearing that Sanchez’s criminal record
shows “the failure of the system.” Feinstein cited Steinle’s death as a
tragedy that “could have been avoided.”
“Law enforcement should have notified the immigration authorities,” she insisted.
Feinstein
urged San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee to join the Department of Homeland
Security’s new initiative, Priority Enforcement Program, that asks local
law enforcement
to notify Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials 48 hours before
the release of a person flagged for possible deportation. The program
replaces the widely reviled Secure Communities under which inmates were
routinely held beyond their release date until
ICE agents could pick them up. Activists have complained that thousands
of people with no violent criminal records were deported.
But
the Priority Enforcement Program has gotten little support from local
officials around the country, who see it as too similar to Secure
Communities.
Lee
has said he believes that the sanctuary policy allows for a better,
less strenuous relationship between immigrant populations and law
enforcement, and that immigrants
in the country illegally can be important informants and witnesses if
they don’t fear deportation.
At
the hearing, senators grappled with how to require sanctuary-city
jurisdictions to adhere to federal law. Saldaña said federal officials
are working with local governments
that operate under sanctuary city policies to reach solutions tailored
to them.
Saldaña
was hopeful that once she understood local problems, she could better
help without having to “hit the jurisdictions over the head with a
federal hammer.”
Sen.
Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) introduced legislation Tuesday targeting
sanctuary jurisdictions. His bill would withhold federal funding and
some grants to states where
local law enforcement fail to cooperate with the federal government in
holding or transferring people in the country illegally. Those
reentering the U.S. after deportation would risk at least five years in
prison.
Sen.
Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) pushed back against some provisions of the
bill, warning that “the notion that we have a minimum five-year sentence
seems to be an invitation
for a lot of prosecutions,” overburdening an already overwhelmed system
for what ICE officials consider a low-level offense.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment