AP
July 27, 2015
A
federal judge has ruled that immigrant children arriving on the U.S.
border with their mothers should not be detained in secure detention
facilities. But experts say
it isn't entirely clear when they might get out.
The
ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Dolly M. Gee has raised a series of
questions about what will happen to hundreds of Central American
children and mothers kept
in family detention facilities in Texas and Pennsylvania that were
created after a surge in the number of immigrants reaching the border
last year.
WHAT IS FAMILY DETENTION?
The
U.S. Department of Homeland Security has poured millions of dollars
into two privately-operated detention centers for women and children in
Karnes City and Dilley,
both located south of San Antonio, Texas. Those centers recently held
more than 2,000 people combined. A third, smaller facility is in Berks
County, Pennsylvania.
The
government said the centers would help deter others from coming to the
U.S.-Mexico border. About 38,000 children came to the U.S.-Mexico border
with a relative during
the 2014 fiscal year.
WHAT DOES THE RULING SAY?
The
ruling says the government has failed to honor a 1997 settlement
agreement that governs how and when immigrant children can be detained.
It also says the government
should release immigrant children from secure family detention
facilities and preferably to a parent, even if the parent is also in
detention.
In
cases where children are held, the judge said the government should
ensure the conditions are safe and sanitary and include access to food
and water, toilets and sinks
and medical and other services.
WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO DETAINED CHILDREN AND MOTHERS?
It isn't entirely clear what will happen to the children and mothers who are currently detained.
Under
the ruling, immigration experts said they believe most of the children
would qualify to be released after a brief stint in custody, many of
them along with their
mothers.
Alex
Nowrasteh, immigration policy analyst at the Cato Institute, said few
of the women and children arriving from Central America are a security
threat and many have
family in the United States. He said he believes the government will
use alternatives to detention, such as ankle bracelets or reporting
requirements, to ensure the families attend immigration court hearings.
In
recent weeks, government officials announced plans to release more
families sooner. On Monday, lawyers at a Texas facility said women were
being coerced into accepting
ankle-monitoring bracelets even though they had already been granted
bond.
WILL THE RULING FUEL MORE IMMIGRATION?
Immigration experts said they don't think the ruling will drive more immigrants to come to the border.
While
government lawyers argued that family detention helped deter
immigration, the judge said officials didn't provide enough evidence to
back up those claims.
Stephen
Yale-Loehr, a professor at Cornell University Law School, said
officials could still keep children in custody, but they would have to
invest significant money
to improve detention conditions to do so. He also said he didn't think
the ruling would factor into families' decisions to come here.
"They're
getting shot at. They just want to get out of the country and go to
some place that will be safer," Yale-Loehr said. "I don't think there
will be a significant
rise or decrease (in immigration) from Judge Gee's order."
WHEN WILL THERE BE A FINAL ANSWER ON THE FATE OF THESE FACILITIES?
The
government has until Aug. 3 to tell the court why officials can't
comply with the ruling within 90 days, and plaintiffs' lawyers have a
week after that to respond.
The government can also decide to appeal the ruling. To prevent it from taking effect, officials would need to seek a stay.
Government lawyers are still reviewing the decision, said Nicole Navas, a Department of Justice spokeswoman.
Peter
Schey, who represents the plaintiffs, said he believes 95 percent of
children and their mothers who are detained will qualify for release,
but he doesn't expect
anyone to get out for at least a few more weeks.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment