New York Times
By Jonathan Martin
June 2, 2015
The
Nevada Legislature adjourned Monday night without voting on a measure
that would change the state’s presidential nominating process to a
primary from a caucus, a blow
to Jeb Bush, who was hoping for the switch to a more inclusive way of
voting.
There
was support among some Nevada Republicans for making the change, but
the party’s leaders in the Assembly did not think there were enough
votes for passage and never
called the roll.
That
was in part because Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic
leader, intervened to help torpedo the change to a primary. Mr. Reid
called Harvey Munford, the lone
Democratic member of the Assembly who had supported the switch in
committee, and persuaded him to drop his support.
Nevada
has only recently become one of the states that is granted coveted
status near the beginning of the presidential nominating calendar, and
right now is slated to
be the fourth state to cast votes.
“When
Nevada was moved up in the process as an early state it was contingent
on Nevada as a caucus state, not a primary,” wrote Kristen Orthman, a
spokeswoman for Mr.
Reid, in an email. “With this bill we (Nevada Democrats) felt it
jeopardized that status because it created uncertainty.”
Ms.
Orthman confirmed Mr. Reid’s lobbying of Mr. Munford, which was first
reported by Jon Ralston, a longtime Nevada political analyst.
Mr.
Reid’s involvement has raised the suspicions of Republicans that the
Nevada Democrat, who is known for his backstage maneuvering in his
state’s politics, was trying
to undermine Mr. Bush and perhaps Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, both
of whom are looking to Nevada as a place to score an early victory.
“Primaries
allow for greater voter participation in the electoral process,” said
Sean Spicer, a senior official at the Republican National Committee.
Commenting
on Mr. Reid, who is not running for re-election next year, Mr. Spicer
added, “It’s sad that Harry Reid’s last stand was a push to keep more
Nevada citizens
from participating.”.
But
it was not only Democrats who ensured the state would continue to use a
caucus: Some conservative Republican assembly members also balked at
the switch.
Gov.
Brian Sandoval of Nevada, a Republican, could call the Legislature back
into a special session to change the law, but few think that is likely.
Asked what the chances
were for such a possibility, Mr. Ralston said, “None.”
Mr.
Bush’s aides were not directly involved in trying to make the switch,
but were relying on allies in the state and the Republican National
Committee to ensure Nevada
moved to a primary. The former Florida governor, who has already made
two campaign trips to Nevada, was hoping for a primary because there
would be a far larger pool of voters participating beyond the sort of
conservatives who often dominate caucuses.
Fewer than 33,000 of the state’s approximately 400,000 registered Republicans voted in the state’s 2012 presidential caucuses.
Now
it remains unclear how aggressively Mr. Bush will compete in a state
with a significant Hispanic population. His advisers saw Nevada as one
of his best opportunities
to notch a needed victory in the first weeks of the nominating contest.
The
Nevada Republican Party is controlled by a conservative faction and
some consultants in the state are concerned about whether the caucus
will be fairly and competently
executed.
A spokesman for Mr. Bush declined to comment.
Alex
Conant, a spokesman for Mr. Rubio, said they remain committed to
“strongly compete in every contest, including the Nevada caucuses.”
Nevada’s
decision to remain a caucus state is good news for at least one
Republican presidential hopeful, though: Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky.
“Nevada
stays a caucus!” John Yob, Mr. Paul’s political director, posted on
Twitter on Monday night. “NV will be an important state spring boarding
into Super Tuesday.
#standwithrand”
Mr.
Paul enjoys a strong following in the libertarian-oriented wing of the
Republican Party in Nevada. Mr. Paul’s father, former Representative Ron
Paul, won 19 percent
of the caucus vote there in 2012.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment