Fox News
By William La Jeunesse
June 23, 2015
Tens
of thousands of illegal immigrant women and children streamed across
the U.S. border last year seeking asylum and protected status, claiming a
"credible fear" of
going home to the violence in Central America. President Obama
addressed the crisis through increased border enforcement, more
detention beds, more immigration judges and pressure on political
leaders in their home countries.
But
a year later, new data obtained exclusively by Fox News shows the
policy isn't stopping the influx. Not only are illegal immigrant women
and children continuing to
cross the border in large numbers, but the majority charged with crimes
aren't even showing up for court.
"That
strategy is obviously a complete failure because such a high percentage
of these people who were not detained have simply melted into the
larger illegal population
and have no fear of immigration enforcement," said Jessica Vaughan,
director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies.
Statistics
released by the Department of Justice Executive Office of Immigration
Review show 84 percent of those adults with children who were allowed to
remain free pending
trial absconded, and fewer than 4 percent deported themselves
voluntarily.
The
data set, requested by Fox News, underscores the dilemma facing
immigration officials. While the ACLU and more than 100 lawmakers on
Capitol Hill want to close federal
detention centers, which they consider inhumane and unacceptable on
legal and moral grounds, releasing the women and children to relatives
and charities virtually guarantees they will fall off the federal
government's radar.
"Now
that we see that 85 percent of the people who were not detained before
their immigration hearings do not show up for these hearings, that
illustrates the need for
detention," Vaughan said.
But
others disagree. After the ACLU sued, a federal judge granted a
preliminary injunction immediately halting the administration's policy
of locking up asylum-seeking
mothers and children. It cited a Department of Homeland Security survey
of women and children in family detention. More than 70 percent claimed
a credible fear of staying in their home country. The judge rejected
the administration's argument that detention
was necessary to prevent a mass influx of new immigrants.
"Many
of these women and children are being terrorized in their own countries
and that's the reason they are leaving," said Belen Robles, a trustee
at El Paso Community
College in Texas, speaking at the annual conference of the National
Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials. "Once they get
here, they need to be treated as human beings and not incarcerated or
put in shelters."
The
data set from the Department of Justice looks at all women and children
detained from Central America beginning July 18, 2014, when Obama
declared the immigrants to
be an enforcement priority and ordered the courts to treat them on a
priority basis.
Since
then, ICE detained 83,385 adults and children, and immigration courts
completed 24,842 cases. Of those, more than 64 percent, or 16,136,
didn't show up for court,
and fewer than 4 percent, or 908, agreed to leave voluntarily.
Among
adults with children not detained, 25,000 have had their initial
appearance; 13,000 are still in the system, and 12,000 have had their
cases completed. Of the cases
completed, 10,000 failed to appear.
But
compare the number of removals for women and children who were detained
against those who were not. Among those families who were allowed to
remain free after their
initial appearance in court, 84 percent never showed up again for their
case. They remain free, scattered in cities across America. By
contrast, almost all of those detained did show up before a judge.
"These
figures are very strong evidence that the Border Patrol was right all
along, that these people were coming because they knew they would be
allowed to stay, that
they were not planning to make some kind of plea for humanitarian
status such as asylum," said Vaughan.
Nevertheless,
immigrant advocates are trying to close down federal government
detention centers and some 130 House Democrats and 33 senators called on
Immigration and
Customs Enforcement to stop family detention altogether. Additionally, a
federal judge in California ruled that detaining immigrant children
violates an existing settlement stipulating that migrant children must
be released to foster care, relatives or --
if they must be held -- in the least restrictive environment possible.
"They
deserve asylum. They are human beings and they deserve to be treated
that way," said Victor Lopez, the mayor of Orange Cove, Calif., a small
town in the Central
Valley. "They should be free, and if they want to be citizens of this
country, they will appear in court."
Yet,
despite "credible fear" claims of violence back home, immigration
judges reject that argument 92 percent of the time for adults with
children. Illegal immigrants
have a better chance of staying in the U.S. by running away than
showing up in court.
Here's why:
-- 103 cities, towns and counties in 33 states have sanctuary policies that protect illegal immigrants from deportation.
--
Most cities and states refuse to honor "immigration detainers" --
meaning they will no longer hold criminal aliens for deportation for 48
hours for pick-up by federal
authorities.
-- Total deportations to date (117,181) are the lowest in four years and 25 percent fewer than at the same time last year.
--
Of those who are deported, 98 percent are either convicted of a felony
or multiple misdemeanors, or re-entered the U.S. illegally multiple
times.
--
Worksite enforcement is virtually non-existent. So far this fiscal
year, ICE conducted just 181 workplace audits and brought charges
against just 27 employers, down
from 3,127 audits in 2013 and 179 arrests. Employer fines are also down
by more than 50 percent.
-- Only eight states require employers to use E-Verify, the federal database used to determine legal status.
--
10 states issue driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, and last week,
for the first time, the administration required employers accept these
licenses for employment
verification, in violation of the Real ID Act.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment