The Hill
By Jonathan Easley
May 31, 2015
Republican
governors with White House ambitions are enacting conservative policies
in their states as they seek to appeal to GOP primary voters in 2016.
Wisconsin
Gov. Scott Walker, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie and Louisiana Gov.
Bobby Jindal are moving aggressively to deepen their state’s
conservative imprint on everything
from social issues to education.
Under
Walker’s guidance, Wisconsin is likely to see stricter abortion laws in
the near future; Christie is plotting an education overhaul to rid New
Jersey of Common Core
education standards; and Jindal has signed a controversial executive
order on religious liberty in Louisiana after the issue backfired on
Republicans in Indiana.
The trio of governors already had conservative records to run on, particularly on fiscal issues.
But
they are finding that’s not enough to earn the trust of interest groups
closely watching the primaries. They also are looking to distinguish
themselves in a crowded
Republican field.
“They’re
all looking for a niche, that edge to help them stand out in a field
that nobody seems able to break away from,” said Republican strategist
Ford O’Connell. “Some
of these issues could be winners, depending on how they’re framed, but
they’re also walking a fine line in appealing to the GOP base without
alienating the general public, should they win the nomination.”
The stakes are highest for Walker, who is near the top of the Republican field nationally.
Walker
famously gutted labor union bargaining rights and became a Republican
hero by staring down tens of thousands of protesters or warding off
attempts to recall him.
Social conservatives, however, are skeptical of his stance on abortion.
They’re
not sure he considers restricting abortion a priority based on his past
remarks. They also say he hasn’t been proactive enough in addressing
the issue as governor.
“He’s
in front of a national audience now,” said Marquette University Law
School pollster Charles Franklin. “He’s competing against other pro-life
candidates and facing
national right-to-life groups that don’t know him and don’t have the
same confidence in him.”
In
March, Walker sought to allay those fears with an open letter to the
Wisconsin legislature requesting a bill banning abortion in the state
after 20 weeks.
In
May, he met with dozens of leaders from prominent socially conservative
and Christian organizations in Washington, and vowed to actively
shepherd the law through the
Wisconsin legislature.
The
Wisconsin legislature is now debating the bill, which includes no
exceptions for rape or incest. It’s expected to sale through the
legislature and be signed by Walker.
“He
says he’s always been pro-life and he’s absolutely right,” said
Franklin. “But before, he could afford to downplay the issue because
pro-life groups in the state had
complete confidence that he’d do the right thing when it came down to
it. He didn’t need to lead the fight rhetorically or make an issue of it
in his recall or reelection efforts. That’s changed.”
Christie
similarly entered the year with a strong record of fiscal conservatism,
frequently pointing to his overhaul of the state’s pension system in
deep blue New Jersey.
But he's seen his polling numbers plummet amid the scandal over lane closures on the George Washington Bridge.
Christie
has increasingly turned to major policy proposals as a way forward with
GOP primary voters. He has embraced entitlement reform and staked out a
position on the
right on immigration.
This
week, he announced he’d had a change of heart on Common Core and would
begin eliminating the education standards from New Jersey.
“Up
until two years ago, he was calling Republican opposition to the
standards a knee-jerk reaction,” said Monmouth University pollster
Patrick Murray. “That was when
he had a high approval rating and looked like he might be able to clear
the field of presidential contenders. But with his BridgeGate downfall,
that’s no longer possible, so he’s zeroed in on a wedge issue as a way
to win over a portion of the base.”
Common
Core has become toxic on the right, with virtually every Republican
presidential candidate vowing to kill the standards if elected
president. But Murray says there’s
risk for Christie in flip-flopping.
“It
undercuts his main selling point, that he’s the most authentic
candidate in the field,” he said. “But he’s made a calculation that
he’ll risk losing some of that authenticity
because it’s such an important hot-button issue and he has to be on the
right side of it.”
In Louisiana, Jindal may have the most hawkish fiscal record of the bunch.
His
state is scrambling to fill a budget hole that Democrats blame on
Jindal’s refusal to raise taxes under any circumstances. The Louisiana
budget is so austere that
the state may have to get creative just to pay for its presidential
primaries.
Jindal
has emerged as one of the most prominent critics of radical Islam, and
has turned much of his attention to other issues that are important to
Christian conservatives
nationwide.
This
month, in an act of defiance, Jindal signed an executive order
protecting religious liberty in the Louisiana just hours after a bill
with the same intent died in
the state legislature.
The
executive order is meant to protect residents from “discriminating
against persons or entities with deeply held religious beliefs” against
same-sex marriage, and came
after governors in Indiana and Arkansas backed down from similar laws
under criticism that it would permit discrimination against gays.
“He’s
taken a beating on some issues here at home, but he’s willing to take
that on and risk losing popularity here because the bigger game for him
is in Washington,”
said Bernie Pinsonat, an independent pollster in the state. “He’s
finished with Louisiana after this session. He’ll announce for president
and then we’ll see very little of him.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment