New York Times
By Julia Preston
March 10, 2015
From
his bench in a federal courthouse barely a mile from the Rio Grande,
Judge Andrew S. Hanen looked over a procession of small-time drug
dealers and thieves, each representing
a lapse of border enforcement.
In
a familiar routine for the judge, he handed out sentences at a hearing
last week to convicted criminals who had been deported to Mexico and
then sneaked back into the
United States. For returning illegally, he sent them to prison for a
year or so, and most likely to another deportation. Judge Hanen warned
them that their time behind bars would be even longer if they ever came
back again.
“I want to be sure you understand that,” he said, looking each man in the eye.
Judge
Hanen is now in the middle of a much bigger legal fight, after his Feb.
16 ruling that temporarily halted President Obama’s executive actions
to shield millions
of unauthorized immigrants from deportation. Among officials from the
26 states bringing the lawsuit, the decision was hailed as a triumph of
law over a reckless president. Mr. Obama said he was confident that the
administration would eventually prevail.
Judge
Hanen came to the Federal District Court here almost 13 years ago from a
strait-laced law practice in Houston. His 123-page injunction against
the executive actions
was informed by a starkly negative view of the Obama administration’s
border security efforts. He began to express that perspective after
seeing the traffic through his courtroom in this borderland city, where
migrants illegally cross every day despite a buildup
of fences and agents, while bloody feuds rage among Mexican drug
cartels just across the river.
“The
court finds that the government’s failure to secure the border has
exacerbated illegal immigration into this country,” Judge Hanen said in
the February ruling. The
states’ coffers were “being drained by the constant influx of illegal
immigrants,” he wrote.
Advocates
for immigrants who want to see the president’s initiatives go forward
have portrayed Judge Hanen, 61, as a right-wing crank. But in Texas he
is known as a conservative
but fair-minded jurist with keen analytical intelligence — and a jovial
sense of humor, even when he is in black robes.
“He
is the complete package,” said David Kent, a lawyer in Dallas who was
with Judge Hanen in Baylor University’s law school class of 1978; Judge
Hanen graduated first
in the class. “Absolutely as sharp as could be,” said Mr. Kent, who
also clerked at the Texas Supreme Court with him, “and on the personal
side so funny, so good-hearted.”
The
Obama administration is seeking an emergency stay of Judge Hanen’s
injunction. The judge on Monday declined to rule yet on that request,
and administration officials
said they would probably move their motion to the United States Court
of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in New Orleans this week. Judge Hanen
still has to rule on the larger constitutional questions in the states’
challenge. He declined to be interviewed for
this article.
Judge
Hanen’s decisions gained new importance to Republicans in Congress who
are determined to stop the president’s actions, after they failed last
week to eliminate funding
for the initiatives in the Homeland Security spending bill. Republicans
are now looking to the courts to keep Mr. Obama’s programs from taking
effect.
Before
moving to Brownsville in 2002, Judge Hanen had a comfortable law
practice, serving at one time as president of the bar association in
Houston. But friends said
his upbringing was modest. John Eddie Williams Jr., a high-profile
trial lawyer in Houston and another Baylor classmate, said Mr. Hanen had
been raised in a bare-bones household in Waco by a single mother.
“In law school, he would wear jeans with holes at the knees, and not because it was fashionable,” Mr. Williams said.
He
recalled that the two of them had been in a study group with a
classmate named Priscilla Owen. Mr. Hanen was always looking to lighten
the studious mood with jokes.
Without telling Ms. Owen, he once enrolled her in a Cotton Queen beauty
pageant, Mr. Williams said. She was startled to receive several
mailings asking for information about her physical endowments, before
Mr. Hanen disclosed his prank.
Today
Ms. Owen is a federal appeals judge for the Fifth Circuit, the court
that will hear the administration’s appeals of Judge Hanen’s decisions
in the states’ lawsuit.
Mr.
Williams said he differed with Judge Hanen on immigration, supporting
Mr. Obama “100 percent.” But he said, “I would disagree with anyone who
would say Andy Hanen
has any prejudice. His decisions will always be based on sound legal
grounds.”
Judge
Hanen is one of the few judges ever to be nominated twice to the same
court by two presidents: by the first President George Bush in 1992, a
nomination never voted
on by the Senate, and by President George W. Bush in 2002.
During
his years in Brownsville, Judge Hanen has sent a corrupt judge to
prison and slogged through dozens of lawsuits over the federal
government’s seizure of land to
build border fences, leaving his courtroom to visit the boundary so he
could see the disputed properties for himself.
But
in recent years, Judge Hanen has raised increasingly vivid alarms about
what he sees as a porous border and lax enforcement. In December 2013,
after sentencing a migrant
smuggler, he issued a broadside when he learned that the authorities
had delivered a child, the smuggler’s cargo, to the child’s mother, an
unauthorized immigrant in Virginia. Judge Hanen accused the
administration of “successfully completing the mission of
the criminal conspiracy.”
In
August, he held forth when a gang member from El Salvador whom he had
previously sent to prison turned up in California after deportation and
was granted a form of
asylum. The administration, he said, “has pulled the pin on a hand
grenade and lobbed it into the streets of Los Angeles, with the faint
hope it will not go off.”
Judge
Hanen supplemented that opinion with charts of the leadership of
Mexican drug cartels. “Rewarding gang or cartel members for their own
antisocial activities endangers
everyone in the United States,” he wrote.
Mr.
Obama has suggested that officials in Texas, which is leading the
states’ lawsuit, shopped for a sympathetic judge before filing in the
Southern District of Texas
in Brownsville. In this court, there is no one other than Judge Hanen
in a position to hear the case.
Speaking
at a town-hall-style meeting in Miami last month, Mr. Obama said he was
not surprised by the injunction. “We saw the judge who was rendering
the opinion,” the
president said.
Michael
A. Olivas, a law professor at the University of Houston, said the move
by Texas officials was fair play. But he said Judge Hanen was often out
of line with his
rebukes of Mr. Obama’s policies. “He goes further than he needs to,
with intemperate, nonjudicious and nongermane elaborations,” he said.
In South Texas, some leaders said the judge was just responding to the conditions around him.
“That
gentleman is constantly hearing the prosecution of drug cartel violence
in his courtroom,” said State Representative Eddie Lucio III, a
Mexican-American Democrat
who lives in Brownsville. “When he says we need to have proper border
enforcement, it’s because he sees the worst of it.”
But
Brownsville’s mayor, Tony Martinez, also a Democrat, said Judge Hanen
had overlooked another side of immigration. It was on full display last
month, the mayor said,
just around the corner from the courthouse, as the city held its annual
festival known as Charro Days, celebrating the unity of cultures
straddling the border. Mr. Martinez and Mr. Lucio joined the parade down
the main street, dressed in their Mexican cowboy
finest.
Mr.
Martinez filed papers to the court supporting Mr. Obama’s actions,
saying they would improve enforcement by focusing agents on deporting
criminals, not peaceable workers.
“We may be two countries,” the mayor said, “but on the border we’re one family.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment