The Hill:
By Ben Kamisar
March 4, 2015
The
Obama administration granted about 100,000 expanded work permits to
undocumented immigrants under the president’s controversial executive
actions before a federal
court blocked the administration from implementing the new policies,
new court documents show.
The
Justice Department said that the administration immediately began
processing renewals of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
program, created by Obama in 2012,
under new guidelines that extended work permit grants from two years to
three. Those people had originally applied under the old rules, but
renewals processed after Nov. 24 were granted the extension.
The
administration had said it would not be accepting applications under
the new guidelines until Feb. 18 or processing them before March 4. And
when a federal judge ruled
Feb. 16 to temporarily halt the implementation of those actions, many
assumed that the administration had not yet acted on any of those policy
changes.
The
Justice Department’s advisory document, filed with the court Tuesday,
admits that “may have led to confusion about when USCIS had begun
providing three-year terms
of deferred action to individuals already eligible for deferred action
under 2012.”
Rep.
Pete Sessions (R-Texas), the House Rules chairman, criticized Obama for
being “disingenuous” throughout the creation and implementation of his
executive actions.
“His
hasty actions show that he not only disregards the legislative process
but he has no respect for our judicial system either,” he said in an
emailed statement.
“The
president knew that his use of executive fiat to grant blanket amnesty
was illegal so it does not surprise me that he fast-tracked his lawless
plan in an attempt
to get ahead of a judicial ruling that was inevitable.”
But
Homeland Security officials pushed back and said that the agency’s
announced its intent with a November memo authored by DHS Secretary Jeh
Johnson. That memo directs
the department to extend work permits for renewals to three years by
Nov. 24.
“There
was no attempt to hide it in any way in any of the pleadings that were
filed on our side, and the secretary’s memo is crystal clear,” an
official told The Hill.
“We
realized in retrospect when we looked at this one thing that there may
have been some confusion, so we wanted to make sure that we brought it
to the court’s attention."
The
Homeland Security official portrayed the change as a procedural move to
help cut down on workload and one that hadn’t been challenged by
opponents of the president’s
immigration actions.
“If you look at the briefing that was filed by the 26 states, that was an issue that didn’t even come up," the official said.
“No one argued about that issue.”
The
administration is currently appealing to overturn the federal court’s
decision and allow Homeland Security to move forward with the
president’s immigration actions.
It’s also arguing that the court doesn’t have a right to fully halt the
programs, only to halt its effects within the court’s jurisdiction.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment