New York Times:
By Kirk Semple
August 14, 2014
Yovany’s
first opportunity to face the United States justice system came late on
Thursday morning, more than a month after his journey from Guatemala
ended in an American
detention center near the Southwest border.
Alone,
the 16-year-old entered an immigration courtroom on Broadway in Lower
Manhattan and braced for mercilessness. Instead, he met Judge F. James
Loprest Jr.
“Do
you have a lawyer?” the judge asked, his tone soft, his cadence gentle.
He patiently explained that the nation’s immigration laws were
complicated and encouraged the
boy to get a lawyer to explore possible relief from deportation.
“I’m supposed to act as a referee,” Judge Loprest continued. “But I’m happy to give you the time that you need.”
Yovany
was among 55 children who have come before the judge this week as part
of a new accelerated court process, a cornerstone of the Obama
administration’s strategy
to deal with the surge of unaccompanied minors from Central America.
Under
the new procedures, the Justice Department is moving children who
recently arrived to the head of the line to see immigration judges,
possibly leading to deportation
within months rather than years, the usual time frame amid the
tremendous backlogs in the immigration court system. Quicker
deportations, some officials have said, might send a strong message to
the countries where the children are coming from and help to
deter others from migrating illegally.
But
immigrants’ advocates and service providers have been concerned that
the accelerated process — known more formally as “priority dockets” and
informally as “surge dockets”
or “rocket dockets” — would somehow compromise due process.
They
worried that the Obama administration’s urgency to deport the new
arrivals would make it much more difficult for children to find
affordable, competent legal help.
They feared that in the rush, some children might not receive notices
of court hearings, leading to judgments in absentia and guaranteed
deportations.
While
some of those fears have been realized around the country, the
experience in New York this week, service providers said, has been
remarkably smooth.
On
Wednesday, the first day of the priority dockets, 29 of 32 children
appeared for initial hearings — and one of those who failed to appear
had never been notified, legal
service providers said. On Thursday, 26 of 27 showed up.
Judge Loprest set continuances for nearly all of the children in October and November.
“It’s
working seamlessly,” said Jojo Annobil, chief of the immigration law
unit at the Legal Aid Society, who was helping to coordinate a small
brigade of representatives
from an array of different service providers and law firms.
Before
the surge of unaccompanied minors became a crisis for the Obama
administration, the immigration courts in New York, among the nation’s
busiest, held four special
juvenile dockets every month for children facing deportation. In
coordination with court officials, a coalition of groups — including the
American Immigration Lawyers Association, Catholic Charities Community
Services, Legal Aid, Safe Passage Project and the
Door — provided screening and free legal representation to the
children.
In
July, Justice Department officials announced their plan to reshuffle
priorities and to put unaccompanied minors, as well as families with
children, first in line to
see immigration judges.
Immigrants’
advocates in New York learned only at the end of July that the Justice
Department had scheduled the new juvenile dockets starting this week.
The groups, already
overstretched, rushed to develop a plan of action.
The
special dockets unfolded this week on the 12th floor of 26 Federal
Plaza, a hulking federal office building near City Hall. The children,
most accompanied by relatives,
began to gather in the hallway outside Courtroom 31 by 8 a.m., an hour
before the hearings were to begin.
Representatives
from the nonprofit groups greeted them. “I know this can be confusing,”
Lenni Benson, director of Safe Passage, said on Wednesday.
On
both days, Elvis Garcia Callejas, a representative from Catholic
Charities, used a white board to present the families with a primer, in
Spanish, on how the court works
and on possible avenues of relief they might pursue to avoid a
deportation order.
Most
of the defendants appeared to be teenagers, although there were
children as young as 4. Two young sisters wore matching striped dresses.
“The judge is not going to rule today,” Mr. Garcia Callejas clarified.
Then,
those children without lawyers were invited into a large hearing room
down the hall to be interviewed by volunteer attorneys. The children
with lawyers were crowded
with their families onto the few wooden benches in the gallery of
Courtroom 31 and awaited their hearings.
Minutes
later, Judge Loprest bounded in. “Good morning, everybody,” he
exclaimed, shedding his black judicial robe to reveal a blue tie and his
shirt sleeves rolled up.
“How’s everybody today?” Casually introducing himself as “James
Loprest,” he said, “I want to thank you for being here.”
He
was friendly and avuncular. He invited questions from the defendants.
“I don’t want anything to be a mystery to anybody,” he said.
Justice
Department officials said they had a mandate to ensure that children
went before an immigration judge within 21 days of being placed in
deportation proceedings.
They plan to hold the special dockets as often as necessary to reach
that goal.
But
Mr. Annobil said the service providers that have customarily worked on
juvenile dockets have agreed on a schedule to ensure that there will be
sufficient help to staff
the screenings through the end of the month.
The next challenge, he said, is to figure out how to provide legal representation for every child who needs it.
Judge
Loprest gave Yovany, who now lives with a cousin in Babylon, Long
Island, more than three months to find a lawyer. “Can I ask you to come
back on Nov. 19?” the judge
inquired. The boy nodded.
In
the hallway, Yovany smiled, visibly relieved. He held a list of
nonprofit organizations that might be able to provide him with legal
help.
The morning’s experience, he said, had not been what he had expected.
“It’s not like everyone says it is — they say the court is very strict,” he said. “It’s much calmer.”
Another
Guatemalan defendant, Melissa, 17, also seemed buoyant after her
hearing. She left her home in Guatemala in June but was detained at the
Texas border two weeks
later, eventually being released to her father, Edwin, last month. Her
brother, who had also been detained, arrived a week later.
“The
judge was a very understandable guy,” said Edwin, a construction worker
who lives with his children in Nyack, N.Y. “He gave us another chance.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment