Wall Street Journal
By Beth Reinhard
August 10, 2014
New
television ads by Republican Senate candidates in Arkansas and New
Hampshire blame the recent surge of illegal immigration on Democratic
support for "amnesty."
And
in Maine, Republican Gov. Paul LePage is bashing his Democratic
challenger for supporting government welfare for illegal immigrants.
The
current immigration crisis is reaching parts of the campaign trail
closer to the Canadian border than Mexico's. Republicans cite the
arrival of tens of thousands of
unaccompanied Central American children in recent months to argue that
Democrats are supporting bad immigration policy. A recent Wall Street
Journal/NBC News poll found 64% disapprove of the U.S. response to the
border crossings.
Democrats,
fighting back, say the GOP is playing politics with a humanitarian
crisis and seeking to drive up voter turnout in November. Maine's Mr.
LePage "has chosen
to focus on an extremely divisive issue in an election year to rally
his conservative base," said Lizzy Reinholt, a spokeswoman for the
governor's Democratic challenger, U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud.
Until
recently, immigration had surfaced as an issue only in Republican
primaries, and mostly in border states, said Elizabeth Wilner of Kantar
Media's Campaign Media
Analysis Group, which provides research on political ads.
Two
weeks ago, New Hampshire Senate candidate Scott Brown became the first
GOP candidate to raise the issue in general-election ads, Ms. Wilner
said.
Another
GOP Senate candidate, Terri Lynn Land of Michigan, joined in last week,
airing grainy images of border crossings and accusing her Democratic
rival of "playing
Washington politics." And Arkansas Senate candidate Tom Cotton started
running a TV spot attacking Democratic Sen. Mark Pryor over immigration.
"Chaos and crime. Washington made the mess," declares the ad from Mr.
Cotton.
Democrats
say the ads are misleading, pointing out the Senate legislation they
backed last year included $40 billion for border security. "Pryor voted
no amnesty. 20,000
agents. A 700-mile fence," says the counterattack ad aired by the
senator Thursday.
But
the bill also would have allowed undocumented workers to earn
citizenship, and recent polls suggest the border crisis is boosting
public support for tougher immigration
policies.
In
the recent Wall Street Journal poll, 51% said the children should be
returned immediately to their home country because allowing them to stay
will encourage more illegal
immigration and burden public resources. Forty-three percent said the
U.S. should let the children—who could be in danger if they return—to
stay.
In
a recent CNN/ORC International poll, some 51% said the government
should focus on securing the border, while 45% said it was more
important to allow illegal immigrants
with jobs to become legal residents. That marked a shift from February,
when 54% said illegal immigrants with jobs should be eligible for legal
status, while 41% called for greater border security.
The
GOP-led House voted two weeks ago to end President Barack Obama's
program offering work permits to some immigrants brought illegally to
the U.S. as children. A number
of Republicans argue that program, along with the broad immigration
overhaul that passed the Senate last year, encouraged the border influx.
But
the Senate passed that legislation with GOP support, and the New
Hampshire Democratic Party has seized on Mr. Brown's new ad to point out
that the state's Republican
senator, Kelly Ayotte, voted for the bipartisan bill along with
Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen.
"This
negative ad reeks of desperation," said Julie McClain, spokeswoman for
the New Hampshire Democratic Party. Two recent polls show Mr. Brown
trailing Ms. Shaheen by
eight to 10 points.
In
Maine, Mr. LePage has criticized the Obama administration for not
notifying him about its placement of eight children in his state who
illegally crossed the border.
"It is wrong for the federal government to force a higher burden on the
people of Maine to pay for those who come to our country illegally," he
said.
He
also has attacked Mr. Michaud for opposing his plan to ban illegal
immigrants from receiving social services and other assistance from
state government. Mr. Michaud
said the proposal would unfairly affect victims of sex trafficking and
refugees seeking asylum, and that municipalities don't have the
resources to determine the legal status of every resident seeking
assistance.
An independent candidate, Eliot Cutler, placed second in the 2010 race for governor and is running again this year.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment