Wall Street Journal
By Miguel Bustillo and Tamara Audi
November 9, 2015
A
federal appeals court Monday upheld a lower court’s ruling blocking the
Obama administration’s plans to defer deportations for more than four
million undocumented immigrants.
The
2-1 decision by a three-judge panel of the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals upholds an injunction by a Texas federal judge that has blocked
President Barack Obama’s
2014 immigration initiative, after leaders from 26 states challenged
its legality.
The
appeals-court ruling was widely anticipated, after a three-judge panel
of the same court rejected the Obama administration arguments to quickly
lift the injunction
in May. But it paves the way for a potential appeal of the matter to
the U.S. Supreme Court—and all but ensures that the immigration
initiative will remained mired in a legal dispute through most, if not
all, of Mr. Obama’s term in office.
Leaders
from Texas and 25 other largely Republican states have argued that Mr.
Obama’s executive immigration action represented an unconstitutional
overreach of presidential
power because it took place without approval from Congress.
The
Justice Department has countered that the president was within his
authority, and leaders in more than a dozen mostly Democratic states, as
well as dozens of cities
including Los Angeles and New York, have filed briefs supporting the
administration.
But
U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen, based in Brownsville, Texas,
temporarily blocked the immigration plan in February, pending a full
trial on the matter, and it has
been effectively stalled since.
The
ruling blocked a new program called Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents, or DAPA, which would apply to
an estimated four million
people who have been in the country since 2010 and have a child who is a
U.S. citizen or permanent resident.
It
also halted an expansion of an existing 2012 program called Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, which allows relief from
deportation for people brought
to the U.S. as children.
On
Monday, following oral arguments before the court in July, the Fifth
U.S. Circuit Court affirmed Judge Hanen’s injunction, finding that the
states had legal standing
to challenge the matter, an issue that has been disputed in the case,
and that the states had a “substantial likelihood of success” based on
the merits of their case.
Texas
Attorney General Ken Paxton praised the ruling Monday, saying it
demonstrated the strength of the states’ arguments that Mr. Obama’s
actions were unlawful.
“Today,
the Fifth Circuit asserted that the separation of powers remains the
law of the land, and the president must follow the rule of law, just
like everybody else,”
Mr. Paxton said. “Throughout this process, the Obama administration has
aggressively disregarded the constitutional limits on executive power.”
A
spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice said it “is committed to
taking steps that will resolve the immigration litigation as quickly as
possible in order to allow
DHS to bring greater accountability to our immigration system by
prioritizing the removal of the worst offenders, not people who have
long ties to the United States and who are raising American children.”
The spokesman added the Justice Department “is reviewing the opinion to determine how best to proceed to accomplish that goal.”
The
government is working against the clock and will have to act quickly to
have a chance at getting the case heard in the current term, which runs
until the end of June
2016. The court, which schedules arguments in appeals from October to
April each term, needs to receive the appeal and get briefs from both
sides before deciding whether to accept the case. Any delay would likely
push the case into the next term and past the
presidential election.
Immigration
advocates said they were disappointed but not surprised by the ruling,
and pressed the Obama administration to swiftly appeal to the Supreme
Court.
“We
ask Obama to appeal to the Supreme Court immediately!” tweeted
Marielena Hincapie, the executive director of the National Immigration
Law Center, an immigration rights
group. She added that a potential silver lining is that the Supreme
Court could now rule by June of 2016.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment