The Hill (Op-Ed)
By Janet Murguia
November 20, 2015
It
is hard to describe the joy millions of American families experienced a
year ago today when President Obama announced two programs that would
provide relief from deportation
for many immigrants in our country who are rooted in community and
family. It was visceral, the kind of joy that grips your soul until
tears well up. It is not often a public policy pronouncement has that
kind of immediate, deeply emotional effect. But that
is what the expansion of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
(DACA) program and the creation of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program did.
After
a decade of ad nauseam debate on immigration in which the latest
chapter was House leadership’s aggressive refusal to vote on Senate
bipartisan legislation, communities
were in desperate need of relief. While some politicians talk about
immigrants as if they are separate from the rest of America, the reality
is that they are our coworkers, our friends, and our families. That
day, millions of U.S.-citizen children, of spouses,
family, and friends alike, felt that the constant anxiety of having a
loved one forever plucked from their lives without notice might finally
go away.
One
has to imagine the depth of that relief to begin to understand the
equally visceral reaction to seeing it blocked. Instead of a year in
which millions of undocumented
immigrants could have done what our country wants—come forward, pay a
fee, get vetted, work legally—we remain mired in a fight in which
opposing the president takes precedence over economic, political, and
moral benefits.
The
Republican governors and attorneys general leading the lawsuit to block
DACA expansion and DAPA may think they are suing the administration,
but in reality they are
suing all of us. By standing in the way of these programs they are
denying us 29,000 new jobs that would be created every year if these
programs were implemented. They are denying us $230 billion that would
be added to the U.S. GDP over the next decade. They
are denying us the security of having people come forward and go
through criminal background checks. And they are denying us the chance
to help millions of kids no longer live in a state of fear.
We
are hopeful that as the Department of Justice appeals this case to the
Supreme Court, reason and precedent will prevail. Because the record is
clear—since the end of
World War II, presidents of both parties have used discretionary powers
on multiple occasions and for an extensively wide range of reasons to
protect various groups from deportation.
But
when the verdict comes, it will not just affect those immigrants and
their American families. It will leave an indelible mark that will haunt
those intent on prolonging
that suffering for the sake of scoring a political point. Nowhere is
this more evident than among Latinos—76 percent of whom are United
States citizens—who understand not only the consequences of inaction on
immigration policy, but the destructive effect of
dog-whistle politics on the fabric of our country. Their view of the
GOP brand is being poisoned by this intransigence and by the escalating
toxicity taking hold of the campaign trail. It is mind-boggling that
after Republican pundits affirmed Mitt Romney’s
adoption of “self-deportation” in 2012 as a costly electoral mistake,
the 2016 frontrunner has resurrected Operation Wetback, a shameful
chapter in our history that resulted in the deportation of hundreds of
thousands of U.S. citizens.
I
believe Latinos’ rejection of this demagoguery, as illustrated by their
overwhelmingly negative views of these candidates, is an early
indication of how Americans of
good conscience will react to politicians who either seek to stir
intolerance or play along. And given the new level of shameful rhetoric
being spewed about refugees at the moment, we can all use a strong
reminder about the need to reject the politics of fear
that bear no resemblance to who we are as a country.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment