New York Times
By Ashley Parker and Amy Chozick
October 7, 2015
When
Donald J. Trump responded in July to criticism from one of his
Republican rivals, Senator Lindsey Graham, by publicly releasing the
South Carolina lawmaker’s cellphone
number, the public and the press could not get enough of the
jaw-dropping stunt.
But
on Monday, when Mr. Trump sent a case of Trump brand bottled water to
Senator Marco Rubio’s campaign office — poking fun at the Florida
senator’s sweaty debate performance
and penchant for chugging water — the prank fell notably flat.
While
the cellphone gag earned 34,000 mentions in print, broadcast and social
media that day, the Rubio water bottle gambit generated just 7,500
mentions — about one-fifth
as many — during the same period, according to Zignal Labs, a San
Francisco-based analytics company that tracks media.
“A
good old Trump stunt just doesn’t generate the media attention that it
used to, even on social media,” said Anthony York, an analyst at Zignal
Labs.
Though
the New York real estate developer still leads the Republican field in
national polls, Mr. Trump’s ability to command voter and news media
attention simply by being
his outlandish, bombastic self is starting to wane. The decline in
attention for Mr. Trump seems particularly pronounced in the
conservative news media that carry influence over many Republican
primary voters.
Though
many of the mainstream outlets favored by the Republican establishment —
most notably the editorial pages of The Wall Street Journal — have
always greeted Mr. Trump’s
candidacy with a critical, if not disdainful eye, that discomfort has
spread to the news media that speak to the populist base of the
Republican Party, whose anger at Washington has helped fuel Mr. Trump’s
rise. Fox News opinion commentators no longer go on
breathlessly about Mr. Trump’s antics, and conservative talk-radio
programs have moved on to fawn over Ben Carson, Carly Fiorina and
Senator Ted Cruz of Texas.
“It’s
kind of a like a season of TV shows: Eventually, people burn out on
them,” said Erick Erickson, a conservative commentator who runs
RedState.com. “We’ve had a season
of Trump and the plot hasn’t changed, there’s no new twist, and people
are starting to move on to other TV shows.”
After
rescinding an invitation to Mr. Trump from an August candidate forum
following the candidate’s attack on Megyn Kelly of Fox News, Mr.
Erickson said he received the
most hate mail and calls of his career. But, he added, after Mr.
Trump’s shaky performance in the Sept. 16 Republican debate, many of
those readers and listeners tell him they are returning to the fold,
spurred in part by the sense that Mr. Trump is not quite
the substantive candidate they had originally thought.
“What
all the pro-Trump people don’t understand is that conservatives for the
past 20 years have been preprogrammed to go beat Hillary Clinton, and
if they perceive him
as an obstacle to doing that, they’re going to move on,” he said.
The
conservative news media has always been somewhat conflicted over Mr.
Trump, whose tax policies and positions on social issues do not entirely
align with theirs. But
for conservative commentators like Ann Coulter, who, like Mr. Trump, is
focused almost entirely on stopping illegal immigration, the issue is
not that Mr. Trump is losing the support of the conservative news media.
It is that he never had unified support in
this influential space in the first place.
“The
anti-Trump G.O.P. media outlets have gone from blind sputtering hatred
to angry contempt and now seem to have settled on impotent rage,” Ms.
Coulter said.
News
media like CNN also still rely on Mr. Trump to drive ratings, though he
is less of a draw than he had been in months after he announced his
candidacy. In an interview
with CNN on Tuesday, Mr. Trump highlighted his position at the top of
the field and showed no signs of toning down his bombast. “I’m not going
anywhere,” Mr. Trump said. “I’m leading every poll. I’m going to win,
and I’m going to make our country great again.”
But
there are signs that many voters and commentators have at least started
to move on. When Mr. Trump came out strong in the primary polls, the
conservative radio personality
Glenn Beck, who also owns The Blaze, a TV and digital news outlet,
reached out to Mr. Trump’s office to arrange for him to come on the
program. But Mr. Beck’s interest in Mr. Trump appears to have cooled. He
has had Mr. Carson, Mrs. Fiorina and Mr. Cruz on
his nationally syndicated radio program, but said he no longer had any
interest in “the circus” of hosting Mr. Trump.
“I
think he’s a schoolyard bully who does not reflect any of the values
and principles that I see from Americans on both sides,” Mr. Beck said,
expressing frustration
that the anger Mr. Trump has tapped into is often associated with the
Tea Party. “He’s not a Tea Party guy,” he said.
Mr.
Trump has tried to use being shunned in the news media to his
advantage. But he may have hurt his chances of reaching his voter base
when he instigated an on-again,
off-again public feud with Fox News — the highest-rated cable TV
channel in the country, which holds enormous sway over Republican
primary voters — and its chairman and chief executive, Roger E. Ailes.
Mr.
Beck, whose program aired on Fox News until 2011, said he questioned
Mr. Trump’s endgame. “If I were a betting man, I’d put money on Roger
Ailes every time,” Mr. Beck
said.
The
increasingly negative coverage of Mr. Trump by some conservative news
media accompanies a less drastic decline in interest occurring across
the mainstream news media
and even among some voters.
An
analysis by Kalev H. Leetaru, a fellow at George Washington University
who studies media and society, found that although Mr. Trump still
dominated Republican candidate
mentions on network television — nearly 54 percent of all mentions —
the blanket coverage started to slowly decline at the end of August and
into September. His share of airtime dropped below 40 percent multiple
times as candidates like former Gov. Jeb Bush
of Florida, Mr. Carson, Mrs. Fiorina and Mr. Rubio have garnered more
attention.
“It’s
always the new thing that wins, and at a certain point you reach
saturation, and with Trump we’re kind of at a saturation point,” Mr.
Leetaru said.
Two.42.Solutions,
a nonpartisan media analytics company, also found that voter
conversations about Mr. Trump took on a more negative tone after the
second debate, during
which he sharply criticized several rivals.
“The
tide is turning in terms of sentiment, at least for Mr. Trump,” said
Mohammad Hamid, a founder and chief technology officer of the company.
“Our data shows the bubble
will burst. It’s just a matter of when.”
And
Zignal Labs found that as Mr. Trump’s share of news media attention
declined, Mr. Carson and Mrs. Fiorina had increased shares.
“It’s
an interesting question of who is losing who,” said Josh Ginsberg, the
chief executive of Zignal Labs. “Are voters reacting off of conservative
media, or is conservative
media reacting off of voters?”
But, Mr. Ginsberg added, losing the conservative news media could have long-term ramifications for a Trump candidacy.
“Primary
voters in states like Iowa or South Carolina or New Hampshire are going
to get their cues from these outlets,” he said, “so Trump has really
big issues he needs
to look at here.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment