Fox Latino (Op-Ed)
By Ali Noorani
June 2, 2015
News
reports would have you believe the courts are an insurmountable
obstacle for President Obama’s executive action on immigration.
First of all, not so fast. Second, and even better, the real action on immigration lies with states and with local leaders.
As
for executive action, last week the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
ruled 2-1 to deny a motion by the Obama administration that would have
allowed expanded deferred action, a central part of the executive action Obama announced in
November, to take effect while an underlying legal challenge moves
through the courts.
It
wasn’t good news for the administration, but we are far from a last
word. In early July the Fifth Circuit will rule on the actual merits of
the case. Most think the
case will end up in front of the Supreme Court sometime in the next 12
months.
But real leadership on immigration is emerging in unlikely places: Nebraska, Iowa, South Carolina and Alabama.
In
each of these states, conservative voices are speaking in favor of a
more compassionate conversation about immigration and for action from
Congress.
On
Thursday, the Nebraska legislature overrode the governor’s veto to pass
a law that allows Dreamers to seek driver’s licenses, which they now
can do in all 50 states.
Conservative business and faith leaders in Nebraska led the way and
cheered the result. The vote was a resounding 34-10.
This
in a state that is 86 percent white and only 9 percent people of
Hispanic origin. The Nebraska Republican Party controls five out of six
statewide offices, both of
the state's U.S. Senate seats and two of the state's three U.S. House
seats. The legislature is officially nonpartisan, but legislators'
political affiliations reveal a Republican supermajority.
Meanwhile,
early last week, the Rev. Robbie McAlister of Riverbend Church in
Lexington, S.C., penned an op-ed in that state’s largest newspaper.
Pastor McAlister urged
the candidates for president in 2016 to engage in a different
conversation about immigrants and immigration.
Other
evangelical leaders are making the same arguments, including the Revs.
John Opgenorth and John Shaull in Iowa and the Rev. Alan Cross in
Alabama.
Here’s
the thing: These unusual voices aren’t so unusual anymore. Around the
country, not just faith but also law enforcement, business and community
leaders have rejected
politicking about immigration.
That’s
because they recognize that America thrives when immigrants have access
to the opportunities, skills and status that allow them to reach their
fullest potential.
They
are working to meet President Reagan’s vision of a “shining city on a
hill … teeming with people of all kinds living in harmony and peace.”
Thanks
to this different conversation, Congress has the opportunity to take
action – right now – and replace our broken immigration system.
Republicans
can pass real, permanent reform that makes executive action moot and
take credit for a new process that respects the rule of law, boosts our
economy and keeps
families intact. Or they can take credit for perpetuating a system that
is failing all of us.
Their
choice has implications for 2016. With broad American consensus in
favor of immigration reform and without progress in Congress, it is no
surprise that immigration
is playing so prominently in the presidential race.
Serious
candidates know pro-reform voters across party lines are up for grabs.
Candidates need to talk about the real costs of a broken system, while
also addressing what
they’re going to do about 11 million undocumented immigrants who have
no path forward.
These
are real people and families who are part of our communities, and they
should have the opportunity to come forward and earn eventual legal
status and citizenship.
People recognize how greatly we will benefit when everyone can contribute fully, no matter where they were born.
Voters expect the same from Congress and from candidates.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment