Fusion
By Brett LoGiurato
May 31, 2015
As
the executive director of pro-immigration reform group America’s Voice,
Frank Sharry has pushed politicians for years to “lean in” on
immigration.
He
says it worked with U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colorado) in 2008 and
with Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid in 2010. But the most unlikely
beneficiary of the so-called
leaning in, Sharry says, was Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina)
last year.
“How
did he do it? He didn’t do it by saying I’m going to change my
position. He did it by explaining his position,” Sharry told Fusion.
“You win by leaning into the issue,” Sharry told Fusion. “I think Lindsey Graham is the Republican version of that.”
“The
future of the GOP is at risk,” he added. “And he’s carrying the mine,
saying, ‘Hey, fellas. We’re going to get our clocks cleaned unless we
get right on this issue.’”
On
Monday, Graham is announcing a new candidacy — he will enter his name
into the ballooning pool of Republican candidates seeking to become the
country’s next president.
And judging from his presidential preparations so far, he’ll often be
out on an island on an issue of rising importance among the Republican
primary electorate.
Out
on the trail so far, Graham has continued to pronounce a full-throated
support of a comprehensive legislative solution to reform the nation’s
immigration laws. He
helped spearhead the reform effort in the Senate in 2013 as part of the
“gang of eight,” which included fellow Republican candidate and U.S.
Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Florida).
But
while Rubio has cautiously shifted his position after coming under fire
from conservatives, Graham has continued to support a similar,
comprehensive approach — and
defended the process to anyone who questions it.
“It’s
a sharp contrast to Marco Rubio, who has been running away from it ever
since,” Sharry said. “It’s an act of betrayal to immigrants and their
allies, and raises
character questions for all voters.”
Rubio
has said that he now believes a “piecemeal,” step-by-step approach
toward reform is a better solution — but he has also touted his 2013
efforts on the bill that
passed the Senate and was never taken up in the House of
Representatives. When questioned after his campaign announcement whether
he’d sign his own immigration bill, Rubio demurred.
“It’s
focus-group tested malarkey,” he said. “It is so transparently bogus to
anyone, including [Rubio]. That’s what’s so infuriating about it, is
that he knows it.”
Graham and Rubio were two of the four Republican senators in the "gang of eight."
That
kind of talk, Sharry said, “makes our blood boil.” Because he believes
Graham’s re-election last year in the deep-red state of South Carolina
can serve as a model
to GOP presidential candidates worried about damaging their standing
with primary voters. Graham fended off primary challengers and won in a
landslide, with about 56 percent of the vote (the next closest candidate
got about 16 percent).
It’s
a model that Republicans think needs to be extrapolated nationally.
Whit Ayres, a pollster who works on Rubio’s campaign, recently said that
Republicans would need
to win 40 percent of the Latino vote to take back the White House in
2016.
Alfonso
Aguilar, a former Bush administration official who’s now the executive
director of the American Principles Project’s Latino Partnership, is
another Republican
fretting over the party’s future. He fears Republicans may only accept
the reality on immigration reform after the growing electorate of
Latinos moves further and further away from the party.
“The
question is, when are Republicans going to get it? Is it going to be
sooner or later?” he told Fusion earlier this year. “Are we going to
have to lose a couple of
presidential elections to understand that? I’m hoping that we can learn
that lesson soon.”
Rubio
earlier this year told a crowd at the Conservative Political Action
Committee that “you can’t even have a conversation” about immigration
reform until steps were
taken to secure the U.S.-Mexico border.
But
Graham has offered up that conversation at numerous Republican cattle
calls. Last month in New Hampshire, he portrayed himself as a candidate
who can solve the Republican
Party’s woes with Latino voters. The party’s 2012 nominee, Mitt Romney,
received only 27 percent of the Latino vote against President Barack
Obama, a stark contrast from when former President George W. Bush won 44
percent of the demographic in 2004.
“We
better get immigration right and pick people from all over the world,
not just ones next door,” Graham said at First in the Nation Republican
Leadership Summit in
New Hampshire last month.
“You’re
going to have to come up with an immigration system to have workers to
run the economy in the future,” he added. “And the reason I’m making
this point — there’s
no room I can’t go into as a candidate and look any member of the
Hispanic community in the eye and say, ‘Listen. I believe that you
should be a Republican. You’re hard-working. You’re entrepreneurial.
Pro-life. Patriotic. And I’ve tried to solve a hard problem
like immigration.’”
Graham
was the only one at that summit — which featured most of the 19
potential Republican candidates (or 35, as Graham joked) — to outline
the case for a path to citizenship
for undocumented immigrants. Rubio talked about needing to see
enforcement measures before he could support that path. Former Florida
Gov. Jeb Bush said he’d support a path to “earned legal status” for
undocumented immigrants — not citizenship.
Sharry,
for one, hopes Graham is able to gain enough momentum to get on the
debate stage and make the subject of immigration reform an issue that
gets as much attention
as possible. Fox News and CNN, which are hosting the first two GOP
debates, said recently they’d limit the stage to candidates who place in
the top 10 of national polling.
“He will make all these idiots,” Sharry said, “with their focus group tested soundbites sound ridiculous.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment