Washington Times
By Stephen Dinan
June 10, 2015
GOP
leaders moved to ban President Obama from negotiating global warming
policy and changes to U.S. immigration policy in any new trade deal,
working feverishly Wednesday
to secure final support as they prepare for a Friday showdown on
granting the White House fast-track trade authority.
The
leaders’ decision to schedule the vote suggests they believe they have
wrangled enough supporters to get the bill through — a test of both
House Speaker John A. Boehner,
who will have to deliver most of his GOP troops, and of Mr. Obama, who
will have to deliver the backing of a dozen Democrats.
Part
of the last-second dealmaking involved writing the changes to further
tie Mr. Obama’s hands on thorny issues such as immigration and climate,
which Republicans hoped
would convince wary GOP House members.
“It’s
just making sure that if the administration wants to go down a path of
seeking legislative changes in climate change or immigration, they can’t
do it through a trade
agreement. They’ve got to do it the old-fashioned way and come to
Congress,” said House Committee on Ways and Means Chairman Paul Ryan,
the Wisconsin Republican who’s led the free trade push in the House.
Mr.
Obama is seeking fast-track powers, known as trade promotion authority
(TPA), in order to complete negotiations on the massive Trans-Pacific
Partnership (TPP), a deal
he’s been trying to write to cut trade barriers among a dozen Pacific
Rim countries.
That
trade deal is the top domestic legacy item for Mr. Obama’s final years
in office. But he finds himself having to rely on GOP leaders to deliver
it, and those leaders
are trying to convince Republicans that Mr. Obama won’t be able to use
the international deal as another path to work around Congress on thorny
issues.
Not all Republicans were convinced.
Rep.
Michael C. Burgess, Texas Republican, said he’s been to the secret room
where lawmakers are allowed to read the current negotiating texts of
the TPP — after signing
a confidentiality agreement — and said he’s still worried about the
immigration provisions he read. More than that, he doesn’t trust Mr.
Obama to follow the limits Congress tries to put on him.
“My confidence in this administration has been and remains at an all-time low,” Mr. Burgess said.
Luckily
for Mr. Obama, he doesn’t have to convince Republicans — that’s GOP
leaders’ job. But Mr. Obama will have to deliver enough Democrats, and
that’s proving to be
difficult.
“I’ve
been through this before,” said Rep. Louise McIntosh Slaughter, New
York Democrat. “I’ve just never seen a trade agreement benefit American
manufacturers and American
workers. It was sort of like we put a big sign on our back: ‘Kick me,
come take my job.’”
Mr.
Obama, who has not earned a reputation for good legislative skills over
his first six years in office, has ramped up his efforts this month,
making personal pitches
to Democrats who are still on the fence.
“The
president’s going to continue to make this case to Democrats in the
House. He’s going to continue to make this case to Democrats across the
country,” said White House
press secretary Josh Earnest, who said the trade powers Mr. Obama has
asked Congress for are the most liberal in history, insisting on taking
human rights, environmental and labor standards into consideration in
writing future trade deals.
Some
Democrats said they don’t so much fear a deal Mr. Obama would strike,
but worry about the next president — potentially a Republican — who will
also enjoy fast-track
trade powers under the TPA the House is preparing to debate.
Most
labor unions remain adamantly opposed to the deal, helping keep
Democratic support low. And Mr. Obama’s heir apparent as Democrats’
leader, former Secretary of State
Hillary Rodham Clinton, has pointedly not backed her former boss’ trade
agenda.
Meanwhile,
conservative pressure groups are ramping up their opposition machine.
Heritage Action, which describes itself as pro-free trade, urged
lawmakers to vote against
the bill unless GOP leaders give an “ironclad” commitment that they
won’t reauthorize the Export-Import Bank — the current target of tea
party ire.
Still,
most opposition to the TPA stems not from the Export-Import Bank or the
fast-track powers themselves, but with the TPP, which is still being
negotiated. Opponents
fear that if they approve fast-track powers, they’ll have less leverage
to block a bad TPP agreement.
Mr.
Ryan countered that fast-track powers actually give Congress extra
authority, including access to the negotiating text and a 60-day window
for any final trade agreements
to be debated publicly before Congress can vote.
The
changes he added to the legislation this week would further restrict
the areas where Mr. Obama can negotiate on trade agreements, targeting
immigration and climate
change.
The
immigration changes were negotiated with Rep. Steve King, Iowa
Republican, who has raised concerns over the possibility that a trade
agreement would grant other countries
special access to business-related visas. Previous trade agreements
have included those kinds of provisions.
The
Obama administration has said it’s not negotiating immigration as part
of the TPP, but leaked text of some of the agreement suggests that at
least some of the countries
involved are doing so.
That has complicated GOP leaders’ efforts, but Mr. King said the changes Mr. Ryan made satisfy him.
“I’m confident that Chairman Paul Ryan will stand with us to defend the provisions that are here,” Mr. King said.
Mr.
Ryan wrote similar restrictions for global warming — drawing a rebuke
from environmentalists who, unlike congressional Republicans, were
hoping the president would
use the trade agreements to circumvent Congress and force new
conditions on the U.S.
“President
Obama cannot credibly claim that trade deals will force other countries
to raise their environmental standards if he allows the same deals to
secure a pass
for the U.S. to keep dumping carbon into the planet’s atmosphere,” said
Friends of the Earth climate campaigner Luisa Abbott Galvao.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment