Huffington Post (Op-Ed)
By Matt Barreto and Gary Segura
June 15, 2015
Today
marks the third anniversary of President Barack Obama's Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals (DACA) executive order, a critical moment in
immigration policy history.
DACA directed the Department of Homeland Security to temporarily defer
action on young immigrants living in the United States who came to the
U.S. at an early age as undocumented immigrants with their parents; in
effect, via executive order DACA classified
young immigrants who would have qualified for protection under the
still-unpassed Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors
(DREAM) Act to be treated as if the legislation had been enacted, at
least in a recurring two-year temporary manner.
Three
years later, what is the political significance of DACA? This analysis
considers the two-fold political and electoral significance.
First,
along with the subsequent Deferred Action for Parental Accountability
(DAPA) executive order issued by President Obama following the 2014
midterms, DACA immediately
joined Comprehensive Immigration Reform (CIR) as a certifiable litmus
test issue for Latino voters and, presumably, for many non-Latinos as
well. Second, DACA boosted President Obama's re-election prospects,
thereby altering the electoral calculus for the
2016 presidential aspirants.
Without
comprehensive immigration reform passing, all candidates hoping for the
White House now face a DACA test: Do you support protecting such
covered immigrants from
deportation, or do you support lifting DACA executive orders which has
the effect of continuing deportation orders against DREAMers and parents
alike?
DACA and Obama 2012
Obama's
historic, 2008 election win--including 67 percent support nationally
from Latinos--obscured the fact that, during the 2008 Democratic
primary, Latino Democrats
preferred Hillary Clinton to Obama by a roughly two-to-one ratio.
During both the primary and general election, Obama promised that, if
elected, he would push for comprehensive immigration reform during his
first year in office.
By
the end of 2009, however, the president had abandoned this pledge,
raising doubts among Latinos about the new president's commitment to
their agenda. Polled in late
May and early June 2011, Latinos expressed conflicted feelings about
the president's inaction on immigration. A slight plurality of Latinos,
46 percent, said it was "understandable" that the Administration did not
prioritize immigration reform, given the pressing
economic concerns at the time. But fully 42 percent said Obama had
failed on immigration and "should have prioritized" reform. A little
more than a year before he would stand for re-election, fewer than half
of Latinos polled said they were certain they would
vote for Obama in 2012.
If
Latinos were disappointed by Obama's refusal to push for comprehensive
immigration reform, they were quite frustrated by his administration's
active support for increased
deportations of undocumented immigrants. The number of deportations in
2009 and 2010 exceeded even the highest number of deportations during
the preceding Bush Administration. By late 2011, President Obama's
approval level fell to 49 percent among Latinos.
By
early 2012 and the start of the Republican primary contest, President
Obama's re-election team realized the Administration's decision to move
slow on immigration reform
had jeopardized his support among Latinos and, consequently, his
re-election chances. However, Latino support for Obama immediately
surged following his executive action announcement on June 15, 2012.
As
it happened, Latino Decisions was in the field with a poll when the
decision was announced, thus permitting a comparison of pre- and
post-announcement subsamples. "This
[DACA] action was a double win for the Obama campaign," according to a
2014 research study by political scientists Loren Collingwood, Justin
Gross and Francisco Pedraza. "First, there was huge Latino support for
the decision, and it was immediately reflected
in polling numbers for Obama...Second, since the DACA directive
announced by the president was an administrative order by an executive
agency, Romney had to decide whether, if elected president, he would
allow it to continue or halt it."
The
decision boxed in Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, who not
only opposed DACA but, in a botched attempt to hedge on question of
deportations, issued his
widely-panned "self-deportation" solution.
Five
months later, 75 percent of Latinos voters supported the president at
re-election according to the ImpreMedia/Latino Decisions 2012 election
poll, and higher still
in key swing states like Colorado, Ohio, Nevada and New Mexico. Latino
votes provided sufficient support to ensure Obama's won re-election. On
election day, 58 percent of Latino voters said Obama's DACA policy made
them more enthusiastic about voting for Obama,
compared to just 6 percent who were less enthusiastic --a plus-52
favorable margin on election day! A simple tally of votes the day after
election day 2012 proved that Latino voters provided Obama with his
national margin of victory.
DACA's legacy
Immigration
won't be the only meaningful issue during the 2016 presidential
election, of course. Nor does the decision to support or oppose DACA fully encapsulate the
national debate over immigration. But three years after President
Barack Obama's electorally potent decision, what's clear is that
immigration will be a defining issue between the two parties, and
especially within the Republican Party.
In
particular, the 2014 executive actions by President Obama have been
greeted by overwhelming enthusiasm among Latino voters. A Latino
Decisions poll in December 2014
found that fully 89 percent of Latino voters supported Obama's DACA and
DAPA executive actions and 80 percent said they would oppose any
efforts to block or repeal these immigration actions. Why? Because about
two-thirds of Latino voters personally know an
undocumented immigrant. Because the Congress has not passed immigration
reform, leaving millions of immigrants and their families living in
fear of deportation.
The DACA of June 15, 2012 represents a real, tangible step forward in the
daily lives of immigrant families. More than 700,000 young immigrants
have applied for DACA.
While DACA's primary, real-world policy legacy is the dramatic relief it
provided to these young immigrants, President Obama's DACA announcement
three years ago today
also reshaped the national political debate on immigration, and
particularly the use of presidential executive action as a solution to
legislative gridlock. For Latinos, support for DACA specifically--and
the use of unilateral presidential power in immigration
politics generally--was on the ballot in 2012 and will be again in
2016.
For more information, go to: www,beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment