Washington Times
By S.A Miller and Stephen Dinan
January 14, 2015
The
House GOP heads for its annual policy retreat Thursday in a very
different place on immigration than just a year ago, when House Speaker
John A. Boehner had hoped
to use the gathering as a springboard to push his troops to approve a
broad bill legalizing illegal immigrants.
Now, as congressional Republicans prepare to gather for another retreat, the conversation has completely shifted.
Mr.
Boehner is leading a party that on Wednesday, a day ahead of the
retreat, will pass a bill through the House canceling President Obama’s
deportation amnesty and boosting
pro-enforcement policies. Senate Republicans, who will join the House
GOP for a joint retreat this year, will look for ways to push that
legislation through their chamber too.
(SEE ALSO: Boehner: Amnesty fight with Obama is about runaway executive branch, not immigration)
“Our
goal here is to fund the Department of Homeland Security. Our second
goal is to stop the president’s executive overreach,” Mr. Boehner said
Tuesday as he outlined
the immigration fight. “This is not the way our government was intended
to work. The president said 22 times that he didn’t have the authority
to do what he eventually did. He knows the truth here, and so do the
American people.”
The
GOP predicted near unity in Wednesday’s House votes, signaling just how
much the politics of the issue have changed over the last 12 months.
“They’ve
just come off an election. That makes a big difference,” said Rep.
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Florida Republican from an immigrant-heavy
district who has supported
Mr. Boehner’s previous efforts to pass immigration legislation, though
she also said her colleagues are reacting to a strong political message
from their voters back home.
“Right
after an election you are very much in touch with the people, and the
folks from their districts are expressing their concern about what they
see as immigration
run amok and the border crisis, when the president was saying, ‘Hey,
the border is secure,’ But we see border kids coming through, and that
caused a real shift in the people’s mood,” she said.
The
votes Wednesday will come as part of the debate over funding the
Department of Homeland Security through September, which is the end of
the fiscal year.
Republicans
have scheduled votes on one amendment to cancel Mr. Obama’s new
amnesty, announced in November, which would apply to more than 4 million
illegal immigrants,
and on another amendment to cancel the president’s previous 2012 amnesty that applied to so-called Dreamers, or young adult illegal
immigrants.
Democrats
called those proposals poison pills and pointed to Mr. Obama’s promise
to veto any legislation that tries to stop his amnesties. They said
Republicans were holding
homeland security money hostage to their own immigration demands.
“This
is frivolous,” said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California
Democrat. “Why don’t we live up to our responsibilities in a bipartisan
way here to protect and
defend the American people, to live up to the character of our country,
which is a nation of immigrants?”
The
White House has defended Mr. Obama’s actions as lawful and
constitutional, saying that previous presidents have also granted
“deferred action” — a suspension of deportations,
along with work permits to allow illegal immigrants to compete legally
for jobs.
In
addition to Congress, Mr. Obama’s policy is also being challenged in
the courts, where 25 GOP-leaning states have sued to stop him — a unity
that couldn’t have been
found among Republicans until recently.
Lawmakers and analysts said the 2014 House GOP retreat, held in Cambridge, Maryland, was decisive in the shift.
Mr.
Boehner and his top lieutenants went into the closed-door retreat
promising a set of principles for reform, which they said would guide
the House’s action as it tried
to match the Senate’s broad legalization bill, passed to tremendous
fanfare a year earlier.
But opponents rallied to block the leaders.
Sen.
Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican, had armed House Republicans with a
report on the costs of legalization, and the Eagle Forum produced a
report arguing that the
GOP had little chance of gaining politically from legalization.
Meanwhile
Rep. Steve King, Iowa Republican, had organized several dozen
Republicans to stand up at the meeting and speak out against
legalization, arguing Mr. Obama couldn’t
be trusted to carry out any laws the GOP passed given his past
behavior.
GOP
pollsters who addressed the meeting also told lawmakers that voters
weren’t fired up over the issue, countering what many Republicans had
feared after seeing Hispanic
turnout hurt them in the 2012 elections.
“There was an accumulation of knowledge,” Mr. King said in an interview Tuesday.
Within
a week Mr. Boehner and his fellow GOP leaders had changed their tone,
saying that while they wanted to move forward, they didn’t have a
president they could work
with.
The
GOP leaders suffered one more embarrassment last summer, on a bill
designed to combat the surge of tens of thousands of illegal immigrant
families and unaccompanied
children who stormed the border trying to gain entry.
A
conservative rebellion forced the Republican leaders to pull their
plans, which they’d hoped to pass with the help of Democrats, and
instead negotiate with the conservatives,
approving a bill that gave Mr. Obama less than a quarter of the money
he wanted. At the urging of conservatives, the House also approved a
bill that would have limited Mr. Obama’s amnesty for Dreamers.
This week’s votes will go further, canceling the amnesty program altogether.
Immigrant
rights advocates, who had long counted on at least some Republican
support for legalization, said the GOP’s new unity was lamentable.
“There’s
no daylight anymore between House Republicans on immigration reform,”
said Frank Sharry, executive director of America’s Voice, an advocacy
group. “So much for
a ‘Republican divide’ on immigration, so much for the Republican
attempt to expand its base, and so much for responsible governance.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment