New York Times
By Julia Preston
April 16, 2014
New
deportation cases brought by the Obama administration in the nation’s
immigration courts have been declining steadily since 2009 and judges
have increasingly ruled
against deportations, leading to a 43 percent drop in the number of
deportations through the courts in the last five years, according to
Justice Department statistics released on Wednesday.
The
figures show that the administration opened 26 percent fewer
deportation cases in the courts last year than in 2009. In 2013,
immigration judges ordered deportations
in 105,064 cases nationwide.
The
statistics present a different picture of President Obama’s enforcement
policies than the one painted by many immigrant advocates, who have
assailed the president
as the “deporter in chief” and accused him of rushing to reach a record
of two million deportations. While Mr. Obama has deported more
foreigners than any other president, the pace of deportations has
recently declined.
The
steepest drop in deportations filed in the courts came after 2011, when
the administration began to apply more aggressively a policy of
prosecutorial discretion that
officials said would lead to fewer deportations of illegal immigrants
who had no criminal record. In 2013, the Department of Homeland Security
opened 187,678 deportation cases, nearly 50,000 fewer than in 2011.
At
the same time, the share of cases in which judges decided against
deportation and for allowing foreigners to remain in the United States
has consistently increased,
to about one-third in 2013 from about one-fifth in 2009.
In
the polarized debate over immigration, the court figures do not suggest
there has been any wholesale retreat from enforcement by the
administration, as many Republican
lawmakers contend. Rather, more immigrants are seeking lawyers and
fighting deportations, leading to longer and more complex cases for
immigration judges to weigh.
The
number of deportations ordered by immigration courts is only a portion
of total deportations in a given year. But the lower numbers from the
courts contributed to
a drop in overall deportations in 2013, when enforcement agents made
368,644 removals, a 10 percent decrease from 2012. Also, some
deportations that judges order — for example, if the foreigner becomes a
fugitive — may not be carried out.
In
addition, since 2011 the administration made a major shift in
enforcement geography, sending more agents and resources to the
Southwest border to quickly remove immigrants
caught crossing illegally. Many deportations at the border do not go
through the immigration courts.
The
figures are from the latest yearbook, through fiscal 2013, of the
Executive Office for Immigration Review, the branch of the Justice
Department than runs the immigration
court system. By a peculiarity of American law, the immigration courts
are in the executive branch, not the judiciary. But court officials are
not responsible for enforcement policy or for bringing immigration
prosecutions, which are handled by the Department
of Homeland Security.
The
substantial drop in new deportation cases has contributed to an overall
20 percent decline since 2011 in new matters coming before the
long-overburdened immigration
courts, the figures show. Deportations, known in legal language as
removals, accounted for about 97 percent of the new cases received by
the courts last year.
But
the slowdown in new cases has not eased the vast backlog in the courts,
which increased to 350,330 cases at the end of fiscal 2013, up from
298,063 cases at the end
of fiscal 2011.
Court
officials said the apparent paradox of a shrinking new caseload
coinciding with a swelling backlog was primarily a result of the severe
budget cuts, known as the
sequester, imposed by Congress last year, which prevented the courts
from hiring judges and support staff. The reduced corps of judges could
not keep up with the new cases, much less dig into the backlog, court
officials said.
“Sometimes
the bleeding was quite profuse,” said Juan Osuna, director of the
office that runs the immigration court system. “Not only were we not
able to hire new judges,
we were not able to hire to backfill for those who retired.”
The
number of judges in the nation’s 58 immigration courts fell to 251 at
the end of last year from a peak of 272 three years earlier.
Homeland
Security officials said the court statistics reflected their efforts to
focus on deporting convicted criminals, foreigners posing security
threats and recent
illegal border crossers.
“The
administration has taken a number of steps to focus our resources on
those priorities,” said Peter Boogaard, a department spokesman. He said
“the exercise of prosecutorial
discretion” had led enforcement agents and visa officials to file fewer
deportation charges.
Deportations
were further reduced by a big increase since 2011 in cases that were
suspended, often by agreement between Homeland Security prosecutors and
judges. Under
the prosecutorial discretion policy, administration officials said they
would offer suspensions to clear the court docket of low priority cases
involving immigrants with no criminal records who had families in the
United States.
The number of case suspensions rose to 32,454 in 2013 from 6360 in 2011, an increase of more than 400 percent.
Mr.
Obama has asked Homeland Security Secretary Jeh C. Johnson to review
the enforcement strategy to come up with what he called a more humane
policy. Mr. Johnson has
been meeting with lawmakers, advocates and religious groups to hear
their often impassioned criticism of the current approach.
The new court statistics do not include any description of foreigners facing deportation, such as their criminal histories.
The
figures do reveal that more of them are battling their cases and coming
to court with lawyers versed in the intricacies of immigration law,
which Mr. Osuna hailed
as a positive trend for the system. In 2013, 59 percent of cases
involved lawyers, compared with 35 percent in 2009.
But
Mr. Osuna said the workload for judges had become overwhelming. “Many
courts are bailing water as quickly as it’s coming in,” he said.
Court
backlogs can discourage foreigners living in the country illegally from
trying to fix their status through the legal system, and encourage
migrants in deportation
proceedings to vanish during long waits.
For
the new yearbook, officials said they used a different method to
analyze their data on the courts’ performance, designed to make it
easier for the public to track
the numbers of individual cases moving through the system. The new
statistics cannot be compared with past yearbooks, officials said, but
they went back to apply the new method to all data since 2009.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment