Washington Times
By Stephen Dinan
May 12, 2015
Hispanic
voters like expansive federal spending, want to see an increase in the
minimum wage, say the deficit should be solved by raising taxes and view
tackling global
warming as a major issue — but nearly half say they’re still open to
voting for a Republican in next year’s elections, according to Latino
activists and pollsters.
Despite
looking a lot like base Democratic voters, Hispanics are increasingly
skeptical of both parties, and are more likely to say they’re voting to
advance the Latino
community itself when they go to the polls, Tom Schaller, political
director at polling firm Latino Decisions, said at a presentation on
Hispanic voters hosted Tuesday by the National Council of La Raza.
The
NCLR said it was trying to move the conversation surrounding Hispanic
voters beyond just immigration, saying that in order to win their votes
the political parties
will have to embrace a broader set of policies including expanding
Obamacare and other welfare programs such as food stamps, reforming
criminal justice and sentencing, raising the minimum wage to $12.50 an
hour, lowering debt for college students and doing
more to help students in school learn to speak English.
“The
better Latinos do as a community, the stronger the country is going to
be,” said Clarissa Martinez De Castro, deputy vice president at the
NCLR.
Hispanic
activists face a challenge in trying to force elected lawmakers to
focus on immigration, while also arguing that it’s not the only issue
for them.
But
at least for now, immigration is the top issue for Hispanics, who say
it’s a threshold — if a candidate is unwilling to consider legalizing
illegal immigrants, Latino
voters tune them out no matter what the rest of their stances, Mr.
Schaller said.
That
means Hispanics are closely tied to Democrats — and even if the GOP
were to move toward a pro-legalization stance, the rest of the set of
issues remains heavily Democratic-leaning.
Mr.
Schaller tested support for Hillary Rodham Clinton twice: First around
last year’s early November elections, and then later in the month, after
President Obama announced
his expanded deportation amnesty for illegal immigrants.
In
the first poll, Mrs. Clinton earned about 65 percent of Hispanics’
support, but in the second poll, when asked how they’d feel if Mrs.
Clinton embraced the president’s
policies, her support shot up to 89 percent.
Ms.
Martinez said those kinds of results show the immigration issue has
changed for Hispanics — it’s no longer about supporting legalization,
but being willing as presidential
candidates to take unilateral steps, outside of congressional gridlock,
to grant protections to as many illegal immigrants as possible.
“What we know is the vast majority of Latinos support executive action,” she said.
She
also questioned Republicans’ hopes that offering Hispanic candidates,
such as Sens. Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, both of Cuban descent, will help
win over Latino voters.
She
said the key is political stances, not identity, and she pointed to
Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval, who also is Hispanic but, she said, who
struggled to win Latino voters
until he embraced a more moderate record.
Daniel
Garza, executive director of the Libre Initiative, a Latino advocacy
group with a libertarian bent, bristled at the NCLR’s assertion that
conservatives stand in
the way of Hispanics’ priorities, saying that was a “faulty
assessment.”
Mr.
Garza said Hispanic voters aren’t looking for government solutions as
much as they want to see politicians promote conditions for economic
growth.
“They’re
looking for leadership,” Mr. Garza said. “I think they’re looking for
somebody who’s going to advance policies generating an economic
environment that spurs higher
wages, generates more jobs.”
Mr.
Garza also said the NCLR’s agenda placed most of the action at the feet
of the federal government with calls for lower student debt, expanding
Obamacare and imposing
higher minimum wages or tighter workplace rules.
“Focus on a redistribution of knowledge and opportunity, not a redistribution of wealth and coercion,” Mr. Garza said.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment