USAToday
By Alan Gomez
May 6, 2015
A
full 19 months before the 2016 presidential election, both parties have
established starting positions on immigration that are more extreme
than in previous elections.
On
Tuesday, Democratic front-runner Hillary Clinton said she would shield
from deportation a group of undocumented immigrants that even President
Obama's lawyers have
deemed beyond their legal limit to protect. That follows a month when
Republicans not only voiced their collective opposition to any "amnesty"
for undocumented immigrants, but started talking about restricting
legal immigration as well.
And we're not even in primary season yet.
Let's start with the Democrats.
In
2012, Obama protected from deportation DREAMers, children illegally
brought to the country as minors by their parents. And while Obama moved
to protect even more undocumented
immigrants last year, parents of DREAMers were not included because the
White House says it lacks the legal authority to do so.
Now,
Clinton says she not only wants to protect that group from deportation
but allow them to receive "full and equal citizenship."
The
announcement stunned even the most ardent immigration advocates. Frank
Sharry, executive director of America's Voice, said Clinton had just
"bear-hugged" the immigrant
community. Following an election in which Obama received 71% of the
Hispanic vote, Clinton is clearly trying to match or exceed that share
in 2016.
On the other side of the race, Republicans seem to be taking the right steps to draw in more Hispanic voters.
The
first confirmed candidate in the race was Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, whose
father immigrated from Cuba. Then came Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, who
speaks glowingly about his
parents' immigrant tale from Cuba. Former Florida governor Jeb Bush
jokingly is called the first Hispanic governor of the state due to his
popularity among Hispanics, fluency in Spanish and a Mexican wife.
Yet week by week, the GOP is straying further from a message that would actually lure Hispanics.
During
a speech last month before the National Hispanic Christian Leadership
Conference, Bush boasted about his "bicultural and bilingual" children.
But he stopped short
of advocating a full pathway to citizenship. Instead, he said
undocumented immigrants should be able to receive an "earned legal
status," which Hispanics view as little more than second-class citizenship.
Rubio
was briefly a champion of the Hispanic community when he co-sponsored a
Senate bill in 2013 that granted a pathway to citizenship. But faced
with criticism from
the more conservative GOP corners, Rubio ran from the bill so quickly
he skipped the celebratory press conference after the Senate passed the
measure.
Cruz
has long been criticized by Hispanics for his harsh immigration
policies. He proposes tripling the Border Patrol, only wants to admit
immigrants with specialized
skills and decries "amnesty" for the nation's 11 million undocumented
immigrants.
Then
there's Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker. During interviews on conservative
outlets last month, Walker said he wants to reduce the number of legal
immigrants who enter
the country each year because they take jobs away from American workers
and depress their wages.
That
claim is in dispute. Conservatives cite research defending the
position, while immigration advocates point to other studies that show
wages increase when entrepreneurial
immigrants enter the country and create jobs.
What's
more important is the political fallout of Republicans moving in this
direction. The Hispanic electorate has as much varied opinion as any
other voting bloc, but
I can't picture too many of them embracing this idea.
Why
would they? Walker is basically telling immigrants that fewer of their
friends and colleagues back home should be able to enter the U.S. on a
work visa, and that fewer
of their relatives should be able to enter on a family visa.
That
strategy plays well when you're a Republican running for office in a
conservative state or congressional district, or trying to win the GOP
presidential nomination.
And it will definitely please Americans who feel they can't find a job
or have been forced out of one by lower-paid immigrants.
But
for a party that acknowledges it needs to improve on the 27% of the
Hispanic vote Mitt Romney garnered in 2012 — and now faces Clinton's
immigrant-friendly stance
— I don't see how that strategy works in a general election.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment