The Hill
By Kristina Wong
May 6, 2015
The
Army has already allowed almost 50 illegal immigrants to enlist as
members of Congress debate whether to allow them to seek citizenship
through military service.
Since
January, the Army has accepted into the ranks 46 so-called "Dreamers,"
or people who have immigrated to the U.S. as children and qualify for
President Obama's "Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals" (DACA) program, according to retired
Army Lt. Col. Margaret Stock.
And there are thousands more waiting to enlist, she said.
Stock
helped create a program that allows highly-skilled legal immigrants to
enlist in the military as a fast-track to citizenship.
The
Army this year expanded that program from 1,500 enlistees per year to
3,000 per year, Stock said in an interview with The Hill on Wednesday.
Though
she said the expansion was in order to meet recruitment goals, it also
allowed for those first "Dreamers" to enlist, since there was already a
backlog of thousands
of applicants.
"Otherwise none of them would have been able to sign contracts because there were no spaces left," Stock said.
The program will expand to 5,000 enlistees per year in October, she added.
The
Defense Department ordered the Army to begin accepting illegal
immigrants who qualify for DACA into the program last year, but that
effort stalled since the program
was not created to accept people without legal papers.
The
program, called Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest
(MAVNI), was meant to recruit people with medical training or who speak a
critical language, such
as Mandarin, Urdu or Arabic.
Stock
said some members of Congress are frustrated with the low number of
"Dreamers" being recruited through the program, and are now seeking
other ways to get them in.
The
House next week is set to debate a 2016 defense policy bill that
contains an amendment by Marine veteran Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) to
encourage the Defense Secretary
to consider those who qualify for DACA as "vital" to national security,
enabling them to enlist in the military.
On
Tuesday, a group of 25 House Republicans asked the Rules Committee to
remove the amendment, saying it threatened the passage of the bill,
which authorizes Pentagon
activities and spending.
“This
controversial immigration language greatly increases the risk of the
[bill's] failure to pass the House. The Rules Committee has the power,
and indeed the duty,
to prevent such a threat to our national security," said a letter led
by Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.). Brooks, an Armed Services Committee member,
was one of two 'no' votes against the defense bill.
“Especially
in this time of increased terrorism, our national security should not
be threatened by allowing such controversial language on a program we
have rejected three
times as unconstitutional,” the letter said.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment