Los Angeles Times
By Christi Parsons, Brian Bennett, and Lisa Mascaro
July 25, 2014
Even
as President Obama grapples with the crisis of immigrant children
arriving at the Southwest border, White House officials are laying the
groundwork for a large-scale
expansion of immigrant rights that would come by executive action
within weeks.
Officials
signaled strongly Friday that Obama's move would shield from
deportation large numbers of immigrants living in the country illegally,
as advocacy groups have
demanded.
Roughly
5 million of the estimated 11 million people who entered the country
without legal authorization or overstayed their visas could be protected
under a leading option
the White House is considering, according to officials who discussed
the proposals on condition of anonymity.
Obama
said last month that because Congress had failed to act on
comprehensive immigration reform, he would take executive action to "fix
as much of our immigration system
as I can on my own."
That
move will come by the end of the summer, White House senior advisor Dan
Pfeiffer told reporters Friday. Some officials had advocated waiting
until after the November
midterm election.
Any
such move would prompt a major clash with congressional Republicans,
and at least some White House officials appeared to relish the prospect
that the GOP might overreach
in its response and act in a politically self-destructive manner.
When the decision is announced, it will "increase the angry reactions from Republicans," Pfeiffer said.
"I
would not discount the possibility" that Republicans would seek to
impeach Obama over his next immigration moves, he said, adding that
House Speaker John A. Boehner
(R-Ohio) had "opened the door to impeachment" by his plans to sue Obama
for allegedly exceeding his executive authority.
Pfeiffer made his comments at a breakfast for reporters sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor.
Boehner
repeatedly has ruled out calls for impeachment proceedings, and his
lawsuit against Obama has been widely seen as an effort to provide an
alternative for Republicans
infuriated by what they see as too much unilateral action by the
president.
But
the open references to impeachment at the White House on Friday suggest
that administration officials are trying to shape the political
battleground in advance — portraying
Republicans as obstructionist before launching a broad-sweeping
executive action on a front where conservative sensitivities are
particularly keen: immigration policy.
The
White House is entertaining a range of possibilities that would speed
up deportations in some cases but forestall them in many others.
Obama
could use his executive powers to expedite deportations in response to
the current border crisis, in an effort to clear the large numbers of
unaccompanied minors
gathering daily in the Rio Grande Valley in south Texas.
At
the same time, he seems likely to act to prevent deportations of many
of the immigrants already living, working and raising children in the
U.S.
One
option would allow immigrants who are parents of U.S. citizens to apply
for temporary legal status which would let them work legally in the
U.S. Because children born
in the country automatically receive U.S. citizenship, that option
could affect about 5 million people, researchers estimate.
A
second option would be to allow temporary legal status for the parents
of young people already granted deportation deferrals by the Obama
administration. That would
affect a smaller, but still sizable, number of people.
So
far, more than 520,000 people have received permits to stay and work in
the U.S. under the administration's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which was
created in 2012 for young people who were brought to the U.S. as
children.
Leading
Republicans, including Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, already have called for
ending the deferred action program, and any move to expand it by
including parents would
be certain to draw a furious response from conservatives.
Wary
of the president's potential course of action, Republicans were both
irritated by Pfeiffer's threat and critical of what they saw as an
effort to stir up Democratic
voters and financial donors.
The
campaign arm of the House Democratic leadership began a fundraising
drive featuring Pfeiffer's impeachment forecast within hours of his
making it.
"We
have a humanitarian crisis at our border, and the White House is making
matters worse with inattention and mixed signals," said Boehner's
spokesman, Michael Steel.
"It
is telling, and sad, that a senior White House official is focused on
political games, rather than helping these kids and securing the
border," he said.
As
his aides worked on the longer-term immigration plan, Obama on Friday
met at the White House with the presidents of Honduras, El Salvador and
Guatemala, hoping to enlist
their help in stemming the flow of young migrants.
An
estimated 57,000 unaccompanied minors, mostly from Central America,
have crossed into the U.S. from Mexico since last October.
Obama told the presidents that children who don't have "proper claims" to admission to the U.S. will have to go back home.
Aides said the leaders also agreed on the need to address poverty and violence in Central America.
"The
American people and my administration have great compassion for these
children," Obama told reporters, with the other presidents at his side.
"But I also emphasized
to my friends that we have to deter a continuing influx of children
putting themselves at risk."
How to do that — and how to pay for it — continued to stymie Congress.
Republicans,
who balked at the administration's request for $3.7 billion to increase
the number of deportation courts, bolster border security and care for
the children
who have arrived, proposed a scaled-back plan Friday for less than $1
billion. Senate Democrats have proposed $2.7 billion. Neither is
expected to win support from both chambers.
With
Congress only a few days from its long August break, money is running
out to care for the youths and process their immigration cases.
Border
Patrol agents have been working overtime, and Customs and Border
Protection has racked up large bills to provide food and transportation
to handle the influx.
If
Congress doesn't approve more spending, agency officials will have to
divert money from programs that speed up cross-border trade and cargo,
Customs and Border Protection
chief Gil Kerlikowske said in a C-SPAN interview.
Money, though, is only part of the problem.
House
Republicans have insisted on amending a 2008 law that guarantees
hearings before unaccompanied children can be returned to their home
countries. Senate Democrats
mostly oppose that idea.
The
White House has sent mixed messages, initially saying Congress should
change the law, then backing down after opposition from Senate
Democrats. White House officials
now say Congress should approve the additional funds first.
Republicans
have also been split on immigration, with many conservatives arguing
that Congress should not act because the administration cannot be
trusted to enforce the
immigration laws.
But a majority of GOP lawmakers appeared prepared to break ranks with the conservatives and move ahead for a vote next week.
"The
vast majority of our members want to solve this and do it in a targeted
way that actually addresses the problem," Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.),
the incoming GOP whip,
said after a closed session Friday of House Republicans.
Under
the House Republican proposal, Congress would reimburse states for
deploying National Guard troops, as Republican Gov. Rick Perry of Texas
has done, and speed up
processing of the children's immigration claims. The House proposal
would also allow law enforcement personnel to operate on public lands
beyond what is now allowed, a long-standing issue in some border states.
"If
we do nothing, the president is going to blame us for doing nothing,"
said Rep. Marlin Stutzman (R-Ind.). "We have to step up and show we're
going to do this in an
orderly, lawful, compassionate way."
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment