Republican states send national guard troops to Texas border in show of force

Republican governors from 14 states are sending national guard troops and other personnel to the Texas-Mexico border in a show of force that immigration advocates warn risks lives and critics denounce as “political stunts”. Illustration of couple looking afraid with Ron DeSantis stickers around them ‘He feels unstoppable’: DeSantis plans to export his chilling immigration policies to the nation Read more Florida’s Ron DeSantis has assigned the most – 1,100 people, including 500 national guard and others such as law enforcement officers, a group about 10 times larger than the anti-immigration governor sent in 2021. Others have promised troops are on the way or will arrive in the next three months from Arkansas, South Dakota, Tennessee, Virginia and elsewhere, with governors using words such as “crisis” or “war zone” and accusing Joe Biden of “failing to repel illegals” in their public announcements. Their rush answers a call from the Texas governor, Greg Abbott, for reinforcements, citing an emergency, amid his repeated challenges to federal authority at the border. Abbott said that since 2021 “Texas has spent more than $4.5bn on essential border security operations, and the Texas legislature is currently contemplating an additional $4.6bn for the next two years.” FILE - Migrants wait in line adjacent to the border fence under the watch of the Texas National Guard to enter into El Paso, Texas, Wednesday, May 10, 2023. U.S. authorities say an 8-year-old girl died Wednesday, May 17, in Border Patrol custody, a rare occurrence that comes as the agency struggles with overcrowding. The Border Patrol had 28,717 people in custody on May 10, the day before pandemic-related asylum restrictions expired, which was double from two weeks earlier, according to a court filing. (AP Photo/Andres Leighton, File) Texas’s use of ‘invasion’ clause against immigrants is racist and dangerous, rights groups say Read more State personnel do not have the power to process people crossing the US-Mexico border to request asylum, which comes under federal authority, and experts caution their presence is confusing, intimidating and potentially dangerous. “In my experience, speaking with migrants, I think they certainly feel intimidated,” Hanne Sandison, director of the refugee and immigrant program at the Advocates for Human Rights non-profit, said. She added: “They have really clear and consistent stories across the board of terrifying interactions with some sort of law enforcement at the border. I think it’s not always clear to them who is who.” The troops commonly stand guard on the US side of long coils of razor wire they have spooled along the banks of the river marking the border, intercepting people and ordering them back across the Rio Grande to Mexico, or to wait for federal border agents to arrive. Further risks to those turned away include another river crossing, with the Rio Grande just knee-deep in some parts, potentially deadly in many others, or being taken by human smugglers to even more dangerous crossing points. A man holds a baby, in a large crowd, as migrants face long wait times for border patrol officers at the USA border with Mexico, on the last day of Title 42, in Yuma, Arizona, on May 11, 2023. ‘I feel safe here’: the people leaving everything behind to seek refuge in US Read more “Unfortunately, both governors DeSantis and Abbott have used tools of intimidation in many different fashions through the past couple of years and put migrants’ lives at risk in doing so to win political points,” Sandison said. The Texas military department noted in a statement to the Guardian that the Florida national guard personnel who arrived late last month will be spread roughly from El Paso at the western end of the Texas-Mexico border to Eagle Pass, 500 miles to the south-west and will “augment forces wherever needed”. “Following orientation, Florida national guard service members will help the Texas national guard and our Texas law enforcement partners continue to prevent, deter and interdict transnational criminal activity between points of entry,” said a spokesman for the department. Shalyn Fluharty, executive director at Americans for Immigrant Justice, said that in her experience the majority of migrants she had spoken to will cross actively looking for a border patrol agent to whom they may turn themselves in. However, adding other law enforcement personnel and mixing that with out-of-state national guard troops and other law enforcement personnel was bewildering. Migrants stand near the Rio Grande after crossing the border, to request asylum in the United States. Migrants stand near the Rio Grande after crossing the border, to request asylum in the United States. Photograph: José Luis González/Reuters “There is a right to seek asylum, regardless of your manner of entry,” Fluharty said. “And what you see over and over are people who are sort of forced to enter that way because there’s no other option and they crossed the river looking for federal immigration officials, not trying to avoid them.” She added: “I imagine that it is wildly confusing to stumble across other enforcement officials who are there on the border who actually don’t have the authority or, more specifically, the training to receive highly vulnerable populations who, after fleeing persecution and harm, are looking to surrender themselves to law enforcement for protection.” Other states that have announced plans to send national guard troops to Texas, though in much smaller numbers than Florida, include North Dakota, Idaho, Nebraska, Iowa, West Virginia, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Mississippi, with the aim of also intercepting drug smuggling. During previous deployments of out-of-state troops to Texas, there have been accounts of guard members often having little to do and also suffering from low morale. One Texas official with experience patrolling the border, who spoke to the Guardian on condition of anonymity, fearing reprimand, said out-of-state national guard members were helpful and a “huge deterrent” to migration, and some enjoy the mission, others don’t. “A lot of soldiers and troopers complained because they were away from their family for so long. I think one of the problems we’re having right now is more a personal issue among the commissioned personnel around here because their wives are leaving them. The dedication to the job can become overwhelming to our spouses,” the official said, while adding of some visiting troops: “They love what they do and they feel a sense of purpose, these were guys who were working in retail and now they’re here [and] we’re lucky to have them. They become part of the community.” Abbott’s state border security program, Operation Lone Star, has been highly controversial over issues of treatment of migrants, conditions for troops and the state’s legal authority, with the Department of Justice (DoJ) investigating. The DoJ declined to comment. Meanwhile, DeSantis signed anti-immigration legislation into law last month shortly before formally declaring his run for president. The law criminalizes Floridians who help undocumented immigrants and makes it harder for immigrants to find work, while the governor has caused rows by orchestrating flights to take migrants from Texas to Sacramento, California, and Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, with reported false promises of prearranged jobs and housing. “These are human beings, they’re not political pawns and we can and should do better as a country,” Sandison said, adding: “Responding in this way is devastating and people will suffer and people will die.” The offices of the Texas and Florida governors did not provide comment. You've read 27 articles in the last year Article count on I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I was hoping you would consider taking the step of supporting the Guardian’s journalism. From Elon Musk to Rupert Murdoch, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest – not profit motives. And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media – the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. While fairness guides everything we do, we know there is a right and a wrong position in the fight against racism and for reproductive justice. When we report on issues like the climate crisis, we’re not afraid to name who is responsible. And as a global news organization, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective on US politics – one so often missing from the insular American media bubble. Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone – whether they can afford to pay for news, or not. For more information, visit us at https://www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com/.