Los Angeles Times
By Cathleen Decker
February 4, 2016
New
Hampshire is 94% white and about as far as possible from the nation’s
southern border. Nonetheless, illegal immigration has emerged as a
virulent issue in this state’s
presidential primary.
Donald
Trump is savaging Texas Sen. Ted Cruz on the state’s airwaves,
contending Cruz favors legal status for those in the country without
proper papers. An independent
group backing Florida Sen. Marco Rubio is running ads accusing Cruz of
flip-flopping on the subject. Cruz and Rubio both cast their immigration
plans as uncompromising while dancing around the question of how they
would handle the nearly 11 million people
in the country illegally.
The
involvement of the Republican Party’s top three candidates is driven by
Trump’s vehemence, Cruz and Rubio’s actions as U.S. senators, and the
concern of a small but
persistent percentage of the state’s voters.
But
in this contest, the issue of immigration is also a means of
demonstrating generalized toughness at a time when GOP voters, many of
them fearful of terrorism, economic
uncertainty and cultural shifts, are demanding a forceful presence at
the top of the ticket.
When
I'm president, if we don't know who you are and we don't know why you
are coming, you are not getting in to the United States.
- Sen. Marco Rubio
A
pledge by Republican leaders that this campaign would be sensitive to
the concerns of Latinos and other immigrants has been thoroughly cast
aside in favor of claims
that are often exaggerated by candidates. On Wednesday, Cruz used the
exact language in talking about those immigrants as California’s
then-Gov. Pete Wilson used in a famously controversial ad during his
1994 reelection campaign.
"They
just keep coming," Cruz said during a campaign appearance in Henniker,
N.H., when a voter pressed him on what he would do as president. "Until
you secure the border,
none of the rest of it matters."
Wilson’s
ad, using "they keep coming" as a slogan over black-and-white pictures
of people running across the U.S.-Mexican border, is often cited as a
key moment in mobilizing
Latino voters against the Republicans, helping to turn the nation’s
largest state into a Democratic stronghold.
It
aired at a time when illegal entries to the United States were surging.
Today, the number of people in the country illegally has been on a
steady decline for several
years.
Immigration
has marked the New Hampshire campaign before, often in troubled
economic times. In the midst of a devastating housing crisis in 1992,
Republican Pat Buchanan
scorched immigrants who he said didn’t want to become "Americans" but
wanted "to get the benefits of the welfare state."
Buchanan,
however, was just one candidate. Today, the issue has captured all the
major contenders. Like so much in this campaign, that has been driven by
Trump, who has
cast immigrants in the country illegally as rapists and murderers.
The
brutal ad that Trump has aired repeatedly in New Hampshire against Cruz
uses the senator’s own words to condemn him. Taken from an interview
with Fox News anchor Bret
Baier, it shows Cruz stumbling as he tries to explain how an amendment
he authored that would have allowed legal status for some illegal
immigrants was not, in fact, meant to accomplish that.
Cruz’s stops and starts are overlaid with sarcastic ripostes: "What is he talking about?" and "Yeah, right Ted."
A
CNN/WMUR poll taken last month showed that Trump’s ad had an audience:
11% of likely Republican primary voters considered illegal immigration
the most important issue
in deciding their candidate in the Feb. 9 primary. Terrorism was first
at 34%, followed by jobs and the economy at 26%.
As
they have nationally, the candidates have worked to switch the
immigration conversation away from the tricky question of what should
happen to those in the country
illegally, making it instead largely about terrorism.
During
a speech Tuesday night in Exeter, Rubio raised the subject and said
that as the son of Cuban immigrants he understood the issue "deeply and
personally in all its
complexity." But he immediately cast it in the context of the foreign
threat, not the domestic dilemma.
"I
know that first and foremost that immigration and the debate about it
now has to be about keeping ISIS out of America," he said. "We have to
do things differently now
because we face a threat that wasn't here before," he added, as if to
explain why he has backed away from his co-authorship in 2013 of a
Senate immigration compromise that would have created a path to citizenship for millions of people currently in the country
illegally.
As
president, he would secure the nation's borders, Rubio pledged. "When
I'm president, if we don't know who you are and we don't know why you
are coming, you are not
getting in to the United States," he said.
Rubio
added that he would deport "criminal aliens ... right away." He made no
mention of what to do with the millions of immigrants already here
without legal status,
other than to say that after constructing a wall and tightening
immigration procedures, "After that, we’ll deal with the rest of it --
not amnesty."
Cruz
and Rubio have fought relentlessly over their positions, with Cruz
accusing Rubio of favoring legalization and Rubio pointing to Cruz’s
amendment -- the one in Trump’s
commercial -- as proof he has changed his tune. But the two sound
remarkably similar as they campaign here.
During
an event in Henniker on Wednesday, Cruz called for the same extension
of the border wall, tightened restrictions on visa holders and
job-seekers and eradication
of sanctuary cities that Rubio had cited the night before. Cruz, also
the son of a Cuban immigrant, used military terms to vow that he would
multiply border assets so that "if there’s an attempted incursion, you
direct the boots on the ground to intercept."
He
insisted that "outside of Washington" there was a national consensus to
secure the border and to end illegal immigration, and "that’s how we
solve immigration."
He also asserted, as Buchanan did a generation ago, that such immigrants were profiting from their status.
"Beyond that, we will cut off welfare for those here illegally," he said. Most welfare programs require proof of legal status.
Even
after being pressed by a voter, Cruz did not detail the fate of most of
those already in the country, other than to say that "every criminal
illegal alien will be
deported."
Yet
the questioner said Cruz’s answer had caused him to definitively side
with the Texas senator. The voter, David Stotler, a teacher, said he had
been considering former
Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who supports giving legal status to immigrants
without papers, until he read up on Bush’s positions.
He is sympathetic to immigrants, Stotler said, but has endured years of fighting for citizenship for his Korean-born wife.
"Rules are rules," he said. "Laws are laws."
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment