New York Times
By Ron Nixon
February 19, 2016
The
arrest of a California man on charges that he traveled to Syria to
fight with terrorist groups, then lied about it to the Department of
Homeland Security, offers new
ammunition for both sides in the fierce debate over the refugee policy
of the Obama administration.
Conservatives
and some federal law enforcement officials say the case of the
Californian, Aws Mohammed Younis al-Jayab, 23, shows that the refugee
program leaves the nation
vulnerable to terrorism. But Homeland Security officials and Democrats
in Congress contend that his arrest demonstrates that the system works.
The
ambiguities of Mr. Jayab’s arrest last month are at the core of a
dispute over whether the United States should tightly restrict
immigration from countries associated
with terrorism, or should join some European nations in accepting
rigorously screened applicants in order to help stem the humanitarian
crisis in Syria.
Last
year’s terrorist attacks in Paris and the mass shooting in San
Bernardino, Calif., have prompted a broader examination of America’s
immigration policy because some
officials fear that terrorists could exploit the ways people enter the
country.
Before
his arrest, Mr. Jayab seemed like a typical young adult: He liked
sports cars, studied computer programming at a community college in
Sacramento and worked nights
as a security guard.
But
the federal authorities have charged that Mr. Jayab, who was born in
Iraq and came to the United States as a refugee from Syria, traveled to
that war-torn country
from late 2013 to early 2014 to fight on the side of terrorist groups
and then lied about it to the authorities. He faces up to eight years in
prison if convicted.
“Jihadists
see these programs as a back door into America and will continue to
exploit them until we take action,” said Representative Michael McCaul,
Republican of Texas
and chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, during a hearing
this month on refugee and visa programs.
But
supporters of the administration’s program, like Senator Thomas R.
Carper, Democrat of Delaware and ranking member of the Senate Homeland
Security Committee, said
the arrest of Mr. Jayab and other refugees shows that the system
succeeded in blunting a threat. He added that the long screening process
for Syrian refugees makes it unlikely that terrorists would try to come
to the United States as refugees.
“Terrorists
would be crazy to wait 18 to 24 months while undergoing a rigorous
screening process to get into the country,” Mr. Carper said in an
interview.
Still,
some members of Congress and security experts say the arrest of Mr.
Jayab has forced them to question the screening process. Federal court
documents show that at
least 14 people who came to the United States as refugees have been
arrested on terrorism charges in the last two years, including Mr.
Jayab.
“I
thought that it was very secure until I saw the arrest in California
and Texas,” said John J. Farmer Jr., former senior counsel to the
federal commission that investigated
the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, who is now a professor at Rutgers.
“Now, I have my concerns.”
The
federal authorities charged that Mr. Jayab conspired with Omar Faraj
Saeed Al Hardan, 24, an Iraqi-born refugee living in Houston, to get
weapons training and eventually
sneak into Syria to fight alongside terrorist groups.
Benjamin
Galloway, a federal public defender in Sacramento and Mr. Jayab’s
lawyer, said his client had done nothing wrong. “There is no threat that
this man poses and
no indication that he’s engaged in any activity since his return two
years ago,” he said.
Many
of the Paris attackers were European citizens and could have entered
the United States under the visa waiver program. Tashfeen Malik, one of
the attackers in San
Bernardino, was granted entry to the United States on a K-1 visa, which
can be given to the fiancé or fiancée of an American citizen. And a
number of refugees from Bosnia, Iraq and Somalia have been arrested and
charged with supporting terrorists.
Homeland Security officials say the refugee screening process has a much lower security risk.
Refugees
recommended for resettlement in the United States first undergo
screening abroad, by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner
for Refugees. In addition
to intensive interviews, the agency collects biometric data such as
iris scans and photographs.
In
the United States, refugees face another round of intense screenings
and interviews by caseworkers at the United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services in Washington.
Their names are run through law enforcement and intelligence databases
at the National Counterterrorism Center, the F.B.I., the Defense
Department, the State Department and United States Customs and Border
Protection, among other agencies.
The
Citizenship and Immigration Services agency declined to answer
questions about refugees who have been arrested on charges of terrorism,
citing privacy.
Mr.
Jayab, who came to the United States from Syria as a refugee in October
2012 and who lived for a time in Tucson and Milwaukee, seemed more
interested in fast cars
than in violent extremism.
Court
records show that on Nov. 9, 2013, he flew to Turkey from Chicago and
then traveled to Syria. He told officials that he had gone to Turkey to
visit his grandmother.
But between November 2013 and January 2014, federal officials say, Mr.
Jayab sent private, direct messages on social media saying that he was
in Syria fighting with various terrorist organizations, including Ansar
al-Islam, which has been on the United States’
list of foreign terrorist organizations since 2004.
Mr.
Jayab returned to the United States on Jan. 23, 2014, and settled in
Sacramento, where he attended American River College and had a job as a
security guard, according
to his lawyer.
In interviews with immigration officials and with the F.B.I., Mr. Jayab denied that he had gone to Syria.
Senator
Ron Johnson, Republican of Wisconsin and chairman of the Senate
Homeland Security Committee, said cases like Mr. Jayab’s caused him to
worry about the refugee
program. “What happens when nothing shows up in the databases?” he said
in an interview.
Senior
law enforcement officials and counterterrorism experts have expressed
similar unease. James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director, told a
congressional committee in October
that the federal government could not conduct effective security checks
on Syrian citizens. “We can query our database until the cows come
home, but nothing will show up because we have no record of them,” he
said.
Homeland
Security officials acknowledged that it was possible for people to get
through the screening process, but they added that their biggest worry
was the radicalization
of immigrants after their arrival in the United States.
“I
can tell you who a person is today,” said a senior intelligence
official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not
authorized to discuss the screening
program publicly. “But I can’t tell you who they will become tomorrow.”
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment