New York Times (Editorial)
January 8, 2016
President
Obama once said this about his administration’s deportation priorities:
“We’ll keep focusing enforcement resources on actual threats to our
security. That means
felons, not families. That means criminals, not children. It means gang
members, not moms who are trying to put food on the table for their
kids.”
Encouraging
words, a year ago. But a new year has dawned upon an appalling campaign
of home raids by the Department of Homeland Security to find and deport
hundreds of
would-be refugees back to Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. The
targets are those who arrived in a recent surge of people fleeing
shockingly high levels of gang and drug violence, hunger and poverty and
who offered themselves at the border to the mercy
of the United States, but ultimately lost their cases in immigration
court.
Since
New Year’s, the administration has been sending agents into homes to
make an example of the offenders and to defend the principle of a secure
border. A president
who spoke so movingly about the violent gun deaths of children here has
taken on the job of sending mothers and children on one-way trips to
the deadliest countries in our hemisphere. Mothers and children who pose
no threat, actual or imaginable, to our security.
The
Homeland Security secretary, Jeh Johnson, said in a statement: “Our
borders are not open to illegal migration. If you come here illegally,
we will send you back consistent
with our laws and values.” He added: “This should come as no surprise. I
have said publicly for months that individuals who constitute
enforcement priorities, including families and unaccompanied children,
will be removed.”
It’s no wonder that Donald Trump is applauding the policy, and taking credit for it.
But
Mr. Johnson is wrong to suggest that frightened Central Americans are a
border-security threat. It’s not illegal to go to the border and seek
asylum, as these families
have. And his defense of our “values” jarringly sidesteps vital
questions — Why are people fleeing? And if they are desperate to escape
their murderous homelands, what is the best response of the United
States?
It’s
certainly not home raids that send powerless individuals unjustly back
to mortal danger and, as collateral damage, spread fear and panic in
immigrant neighborhoods
across the country. The homicidal brutality in Central America has
spawned a humanitarian disaster, but the administration has been
treating it as a Texas border-security emergency, and a political
headache. Perhaps this is why its efforts at deterring the
migrant flow have not succeeded. Families have taken the journey
anyway, not because they are determined to flout our immigration laws —
but because they want not to be murdered.
The
administration needs to recognize that this problem cannot be solved in
backward fashion. The answer lies not in sitting idly until refugees
arrive and greeting them
with family prisons and prosecution. It requires addressing the root
causes of the bloody violence in the region, and fixing the chaotic,
underfunded legal system at the border, where migrants with no money or
lawyers — or with bad lawyers — confront the infernal
complexities of immigration and asylum law, and lose. The
administration should have long ago begun building routes of escape for
families in danger, with safe havens and in-country screening for those
seeking resettlement, in the United States or elsewhere
in the region.
While
federal agents have been knocking on doors and spreading fear, advocacy
groups have been scrambling to help the Central Americans. Humanitarian
projects like CARA,
a cooperative effort of legal services organizations, and Raices, which
has worked for years with refugees in Central and South Texas, have
placed urgent calls for funds and volunteers. Protection, due process
and outstretched arms for terrorized families:
That’s an approach consistent with America’s laws and values, not
agents at the door, on the hunt for mothers and children.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment