AP
February 25, 2015
Days
ahead of a looming partial agency shutdown, the pressure is on House
Republicans after Senate GOP leaders agreed to Democratic demands and
announced legislation to
fund the Homeland Security Department without contentious immigration
provisions opposed by Democrats and President Barack Obama.
Early
reviews from House conservatives were negative ahead of a closed-door
caucus meeting set for Wednesday morning, their first since returning
from a weeklong congressional
recess. Several insisted they could not accept the two-part strategy
proposed by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell: a vote on
legislation to fund the Homeland Security Department, and a separate
vote to overturn Obama’s recent executive actions sparing
millions of immigrants in this country illegally from deportation.
The
approach “is tantamount to surrender, and won’t meet with support in
the people’s House,” said Rep. Matt Salmon, R-Ariz. “I will fight
against any funding bill that
does not fully defund the president’s illegal actions.”
Yet
with a partial shutdown set to trigger at midnight Friday without
congressional action, options were few for Republicans who won full
control of Congress in November’s
midterm elections in part on promises to block Obama’s immigration
policies.
They
could allow the agency’s funding to expire, violating their leaders’
promises that there would be no more shutdowns on the GOP watch. They
could try to pass a short-term
extension of current funding levels, postponing the conflict to another
day. Or they could go along with McConnell’s strategy of funding the
agency fully while registering their disapproval of Obama’s immigration
policies with a separate vote.
“I
don’t know what’s not to like about this,” McConnell said. “This is an
approach that respects both points of view and gives senators an
opportunity to go on record
on both, both funding the Department of Homeland Security and
expressing their opposition to what the president did last November.”
For
some Senate Republicans, eager to move beyond fighting over immigration
while courting a shutdown of an agency whose mission includes battling
terrorism, the choice
was clear.
“I
think Mitch’s bifurcated voting process is probably acceptable to the
vast majority of us,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. “I just don’t
know how we do it any other
way.”
There
was criticism from some Senate conservatives, notably Ted Cruz of
Texas, a potential 2016 presidential candidate. But it was unclear how
widespread the sentiment
was.
For their part, after initial reluctance Senate Democrats looked ready to go along with the Senate GOP leader.
“The issue’s very simple: Fully fund the Department of Homeland Security,” said Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash.
McConnell’s
concession came as Senate Democrats repeatedly raised the issue of
terrorism against the GOP, suggesting a partial shutdown would put the
nation at risk at
a dangerous time. Obama scheduled an immigration event in Miami on
Wednesday, picking a presidential swing state to keep the pressure on
the GOP.
Boehner
faced pressures of his own, from conservatives in his caucus who will
be incensed if he moves to follow McConnell’s lead and bow to Democratic
demands. Boehner’s
office issued a statement that neither accepted nor rejected the
proposal McConnell outlined after weeks of gridlock.
“The
speaker has been clear: The House has acted, and now Senate Democrats
need to stop hiding. Will they continue to block funding for the
Department of Homeland Security
or not?” said Boehner spokesman Michael Steel.
One
House Republican allied with Boehner predicted McConnell’s plan might
win approval. Noting that a federal judge in Texas has issued an order
blocking implementation
of Obama’s plan, Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma said the court had
“effectively stopped the president’s executive action,” at least now.
“So I don’t think we’d run the risk of shutting down Homeland Security,”
he added.
The
standoff dates to last fall, when Boehner told fellow Republicans they
should allow the funding of Homeland Security without conditions until
after the elections,
when Republicans would have more leverage.
Republicans
won control of the Senate, but they lack the 60 votes needed to
overcome Democratic blocking actions. As a result, they have been unable
to force a vote on
House-passed DHS funding legislation that includes the repeal of the
immigration policies Obama put into effect in 2012 and last fall.
The
stand-alone immigration bill McConnell is now proposing, which is
likely to face a test vote on Friday, focuses just on Obama’s most
recent immigration directives,
which extended work permits and deportation stays to some 4 million
immigrants in the country illegally. It left untouched the 2012 policy,
which granted protections immigrants brought illegally to the United
States as kids, usually by their parents. Nonetheless
the bill faces likely defeat by Senate Democrats and a certain veto by
Obama.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment