New York Times
By Ashley Parker
February 26, 2015
Just
a day before the Department of Homeland Security is set to run out of
money, the Senate was preparing a bill that would finance the department
without restrictions
on President Obama’s immigration actions. House Republicans were coming
together on a counterproposal that would provide the agency with funds
for only three weeks.
The
Senate is expected to vote Friday on its bill, which would provide the
department with financing for the rest of the fiscal year, through
September. The House is expected
to reject that measure, increasing the prospect that a partial shutdown
of the department would be averted only through the shorter-term
funding accord that the House is expected to propose.
Speaker
John A. Boehner and the Republican leadership team spent much of the
day struggling to find a way to provide money for the department while
also expressing their
displeasure with Mr. Obama’s immigration actions.
Some
Republicans, though, said it was time for Mr. Boehner and his
conference to accept the reality that they needed to approve financing
for the department and delay
the immigration fight with Mr. Obama.
“As
a governing party, we’ve got to fund D.H.S. and say to the House,
‘Here’s a straw so you can suck it up,’ ” said Senator Mark S. Kirk,
Republican of Illinois. “This
battle should be the end of the strategy of attaching whatever you’re
upset at the president to a vital piece of government.”
Emerging
from a private meeting on Thursday evening, House Republicans rejected
the Senate’s expected offer, saying instead that they were prepared to
vote Friday on the
short-term measure to finance the agency. The hope, Republican
lawmakers said, is that they would be able to use that time to enter
into joint negotiations over a broader immigration bill that would halt
Mr. Obama’s recent executive actions.
“It gives us a chance to continue our defense of the Constitution,” said Representative John Carter, Republican of Texas.
But
as House Republicans were filing out of their meeting, the office of
Senator Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada and the minority leader, had
already sent out an email
making it clear that Senate Democrats would not agree to any joint
House-Senate negotiations over the financing bill.
The
Republican plan simply pushes the fight into next month. It creates the
very situation that Republicans had hoped to avoid after the November
elections, when they
took over the Senate and increased their margin in the House: lurching
from crisis to crisis, with little to show in the form of major
legislation.
“It
says a lot about the party,” said Representative Peter T. King,
Republican of New York. “It means trouble. How many times can we go over
the cliff and survive?”
Democrats
have said they oppose a short-term financing measure, though some might
support one in order to avoid shutting down the department. But the
House Democratic
leadership is actively campaigning against the bill.
The
House passed a bill last month that would have financed Homeland
Security, though it included amendments that would gut legal protections
that Mr. Obama’s actions
would provide for as many as five million illegal immigrants, including
those brought into the country as children.
After
failing four times to overcome Democratic opposition and take up the
House bill, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader,
offered a two-step path
this week to keep the agency open: one vote on a bill that deals solely
with department funding and a second vote on a proposal by Senator
Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, to halt the president’s immigration
actions. The Senate will begin voting on those
measures on Friday. Senate Democrats have said they will allow a debate
and vote on the Collins plan, but only after the agency is financed.
The
short-term House proposal reflects the pressure Mr. Boehner is facing
from his more conservative members. They want to use the financing bill
to fight what they say
is Mr. Obama’s executive overreach on immigration. Representative Tim
Huelskamp, Republican of Kansas, said that his Senate counterparts had
put the “surrender caucus” in charge of the chamber, ultimately leaving
Mr. Reid in a position of strength.
Until
Wednesday, Mr. Boehner and Mr. McConnell had not spoken in two weeks.
Asked to describe his relationship with Mr. McConnell, Mr. Boehner
acknowledged that they had
sometimes had “differences.”
“We
have two different institutions that don’t have the same body
temperature every day,” he said. “You know, the House, by nature and by
design, is a hell of a lot more
rambunctious place than the Senate — much more.”
Democrats
said that recent terrorist episodes added urgency to the need to keep
the department functioning seamlessly. “ISIS appears to have money,
terrorists appear to
have money, why shouldn’t our homeland have the ability to protect
itself?” asked Mr. Reid, referring to the terrorist group that is also
known as the Islamic State. “This is like living in a world of crazy
people.”
But
for all the uncertainty over funding the agency, at least one truth was
clear: No path forward will be easy. Walking out of the House
Republican conference meeting
Thursday evening, a reporter asked Representative Hal Rogers of
Kentucky, the Republican chairman of the House Appropriations Committee,
just why he thought the Republican plan would prevail, as Senate
Democrats have made it clear that they will not accept
anything short of a “clean” funding bill.
Several
of Mr. Rogers’s colleagues came to his rescue. They began shouting his
name — “Hal! Hal!” — and pulled him into a jam-packed elevator just as
the doors were closing.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment