Los Angeles Times
By Cindy Carcamo
June 6, 2014
Yoselin
Ramos had long wanted to trek to the United States to escape the
crushing poverty and rising violence in her hometown in Guatemala.
But
it wasn't until the 24-year-old heard about a "new opportunity" that
she packed a bag and left her home with her 3-year-old son, Yovani, for
the treacherous journey
north.
Ramos
became part of an unprecedented surge of families crossing illegally
into the U.S., drawn by reports circulating throughout Central America
that parents with children
are allowed to stay in the United States indefinitely, according to
Guatemalan consular officials and parents who are making these trips.
But these families, U.S. officials say, are getting only half the story.
The
surge of single parents and children has surprised and overwhelmed
border agents in the Southwest — particularly Texas — and flooded the
Greyhound bus stations in
Phoenix and Tucson over the last several months with hundreds of
immigrant families dropped off there by U.S. immigration authorities who
had nowhere else to put them.
Over
the Memorial Day weekend, federal officials flew at least 400 migrants
apprehended in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas to Tucson to be processed,
said Andy Adame, a
spokesman for the Border Patrol in Arizona.
From
there, many were dropped off at bus stations with orders to appear
before immigration authorities at their chosen destination within 15
days. "The Border Patrol does
not have enough space in its processing facilities to handle a surge in
illegal immigrants in south Texas," Adame said.
The
unusual situation represents not a change in policy but an attempt to
accommodate the unexpected numbers, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
officials said. Immigration
authorities have recently opened shelters on military bases in Texas
and California for the wave of children crossing the U.S. border in
ever-greater volumes in recent months. Detention centers are available
for adult immigrants. But there are no similar facilities
for families, at least in the Southwest.
In
2008, immigration officials stopped placing parents traveling with
their children at the T. Don Hutto Residential Center in Taylor, Texas,
after allegations surfaced
of human rights violations at the facility.
The
fact that so many parents with children have been freed to travel
within the U.S. has sent rumors flying through Central American nations
that parents will not be
detained in the U.S. if they arrive with a child — spurring even more
families to launch the journey, according to immigrant advocates and
Guatemalan consular officials in Phoenix who have been working to help
find shelter for families stranded at bus stations.
"Desperate
migrants from Central America may cling to any slim reed of hope. This
false rumor of a 'new opportunity' is leading some to embark on a
dangerous journey.
They have no idea what they are facing. The smugglers are milking this
situation for all it's worth," said Dan Kowalski, an immigration
attorney in Austin, Texas.
Immigration authorities said the numbers appear to be substantial, but they do not yet have an official count.
But
Arizona officials have protested the transfers from Texas. Gov. Jan
Brewer, in a letter to President Obama, said the federal government is
shirking its responsibility
to properly care for the families. Dropping them off in Arizona, where
daytime temperatures are exceeding 100 degrees, appears to "place
expediency over basic humanitarian concerns," the governor wrote.
"State
and local governments, law enforcement agencies, healthcare providers
and nonprofit organizations are all stretched to the breaking point
attempting to manage the
enormity of these challenges," she said.
ICE
officials say that the immigrants are released as long as they can
provide an address for their destination — with family or friends, no
matter their legal status.
Ramos,
who was apprehended in Texas after traveling there by bus and by foot,
was flown to Arizona, then bused this week to Phoenix to join an
informal encampment of migrant
families that has sprung up at the bus terminal.
Ramos
said she was with about 20 other families with children — some as young
as a few months old — when apprehended. They had looked forward to
being caught, she said
— at one point even waving down federal helicopters — because of the
welcoming treatment they had assumed they would receive.
Assuming
that she would be allowed to remain in the U.S., Ramos was instead
given paperwork ordering her to report June 17 to the ICE field office
in Des Moines, near
where her parents live, and allowed to board a bus to Iowa.
"It was disappointing," she said. "I thought I would definitely be allowed to stay. I just want a good future for my son."
Still, she said she plans to keep the appointment because she wants to give her case a chance.
ICE
officials said they couldn't guarantee that they would pursue all cases
in which immigrants do not show up for follow-up appointments, but
would examine each case
to determine priorities.
Anti-illegal immigration activists have said the government's posture is reminiscent of the 1990s "catch and release" policy.
That's
when most people who crossed the border illegally were released on bail
or on their own recognizance, with an order to reappear at a later
date. Many failed to
show up for their hearings. The practice ended in 2006 during the
George W. Bush administration.
ICE
spokeswoman Virginia Kice said there has been no change in immigration
policy and that it's misleading to compare the current situation to
catch and release.
"The
individuals in this instance are being placed under some sort of
supervision," she said. In some cases, authorities said, conditions such
as wearing ankle bracelets
may be imposed, but usually only after the interviews with immigration
officials 15 days after initial detention.
In
some instances, the families seeking to stay will be given an
opportunity to make their case before an immigration judge. In other
instances, the families may be subject
to immediate removal.
There
is no protective status for parents with their children fleeing
violence in Central America. However, some parents could seek different
forms of immigration relief,
such as applying for asylum, said Gregory Z. Chen, director of advocacy
for the American Immigration Lawyers Assn.
Chen
said the practice of freeing detainees pending immigration interviews
is more cost-effective than detaining children and mothers in jail-like
settings, and more humane.
"Do
we really want to see America go in the direction of detaining families
of mothers with children? That is not consistent with America's
values," Chen said.
For
now, a network of volunteers has emerged to help families being dropped
off by immigration officials at bus stations in Arizona. On Tuesday,
Laurie Melrood, an immigrant
rights advocate, spent most of her evening at the Tucson station,
attending to seven Guatemalan mothers and their children.
Melrood
said she first noticed ICE leaving Guatemalan parents with their
children at bus stations about seven months ago, with an increase in
numbers over the last few
weeks.
Melrood
said organized smuggling organizations are exploiting these parents'
vague hope that there is a future for them in the United States.
The
smugglers tell immigrants that they "will spend a few days in a jail
and then be reunited with family members," Melrood said. "What the women
do not know is that they
are in immigration proceedings once caught by Border Patrol and are
facing deportation."
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment