Wall Street Journal
By Beth Reinhard
June 13, 2014
The
latest round of Republican primaries shows that immigration policy
continues to vex a party looking for its next standard-bearer amid a
battle between its establishment
and tea-party wings.
Perhaps
no other issue better illustrates the fault line in the GOP between a
political class seeking to build a national coalition and grass-roots
activists pushing to
reinforce conservative ideology. Both sides are trying to leverage the
results of Tuesday's primaries to rally support for their cause, while
potential presidential contenders struggle to find their footing.
Tea-party
leaders are touting the defeat of Majority Leader Eric Cantor—assailed
by his little-known opponent as "the No. 1 cheerleader for 'amnesty' in
Congress"—as a
cautionary tale that shows the peril of straying from conservative
orthodoxy. Many opponents of an immigration overhaul say it would reward
illegal immigrants with "amnesty'' for breaking the law by granting
them legal status.
After
a primary upset unseated House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, many are
asking how such an upset could have happened. It has also caused a
scramble to fill the open
position. Jerry Seib, Kristina Peterson, Reid Epstein and Bob Ourlian
discuss.
Political
strategists and pollsters are rejecting that interpretation of Mr.
Cantor's defeat, eager to head off an anti-immigration backlash that
they say would jeopardize
the GOP's appeal in 2016 to a diversifying voter pool.
Overshadowed
by Mr. Cantor's defeat on Tuesday, South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham
won his GOP primary in one of the most conservative states in the
country, even though
he had spearheaded legislation to allow illegal immigrants to earn
citizenship. Mr. Cantor, by contrast, backed citizenship only for
children brought to the U.S. illegally, and he decried "amnesty" in the
closing days of his campaign.
"Republicans
who respond to [the Cantor] election by ramping up anti-immigration
rhetoric are making a mistake, because that is not where most
Republicans are, and that
is not going to help us win in 2016," said Republican pollster Chris
Wilson, who advises one of the most conservative potential 2016
candidates, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz.
Another
potential 2016 candidate, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, on Wednesday joined
those who favor an overhaul of immigration laws in disputing the notion
that the issue had
doomed Mr. Cantor. "I say everywhere I go, I am for immigration
reform," Mr. Paul said, though he voted against the bill Mr. Graham
championed.
"I
believe that every single serious candidate for the Republican
presidential nomination will be for some version of immigration reform,"
said Republican pollster Whit
Ayres. "Trying to win a presidential election by getting a larger and
larger share of a smaller and smaller non-Hispanic white proportion of
the electorate is a losing proposition."
But
resistance to an immigration overhaul from the conservative base that
dominates GOP primaries tugs on the 2016 field. During a heated Senate
primary in 2010, now-Sen.
Marco Rubio opposed an immigration plan similar to the bill he helped
pass in the Senate last year. Amid mounting opposition from House
conservatives, Mr. Rubio later muted his role in the immigration debate.
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush tempered his longtime
push for citizenship in a book last year and recommended only legal
status for illegal immigrants.
The
party's conflict over immigration is also playing out at the state
level. Republican gubernatorial nominee Greg Abbott has called for
changing a law, signed by Texas
Gov. Rick Perry, another potential 2016 candidate, which granted
discounted, in-state tuition to the children of illegal immigrants. The
state party recently adopted a platform that favors repealing the law
altogether.
In
another sign of the confusing currents within the party on immigration,
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie signed a law this year offering in-state
tuition rates to the
children of illegal immigrants, though he had criticized Mr. Perry
during the 2012 primary for signing a similar law.
In
Florida, Gov. Rick Scott – who vowed to crack down on illegal
immigrants during his 2010 GOP primary – recently signed a tuition bill
like the one in Texas as he faces
a competitive general election.
Republican
Gov. Paul Le Page of Maine is trying to cut off state welfare
assistance to undocumented workers, while Republican Gov. Rick Snyder is
touting immigration as
a way to reinvigorate the city of Detroit.
Even
the major tea-party groups are divided on immigration reform. Sal
Russo, a top strategist for the Tea Party Express, recently urged
Congress to pass a law giving
legal status to illegal immigrants. Another group, the Tea Party
Patriots, opposes relaxing immigration laws. Jenny Beth Martin,
president of the Tea Party Patriots, said she would oppose a
presidential bid by Mr. Rubio because of his position on immigration.
"The
border should be secured first and foremost, and until that is secure,
nothing else needs to happen," said Ms. Martin, who says Mr. Cantor's
position on immigration
contributed to his loss.
Republican
voters also gave mixed messages on immigration in the last presidential
election. Newt Gingrich, who advocated a more "humane" immigration
policy, won the primary
in conservative South Carolina. Republican nominee Mitt Romney, whose
hard-line position during the 2012 primary haunted him in the general
election, recently said the GOP needs to tackle immigration reform
before 2016.
"I
think don't think there is anyone who doesn't agree that the
immigration system is broken, so you have to start there," said
Republican strategist David Kochel, who
ran Mr. Romney's campaign in Iowa. "You have to say the system is
broken before you call for immigration reform and people get their back
up."
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment